Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Economic Analysis of Urban Tree Replacement Decisions

Jessie L. Scott and David R. Betters
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2000, 26 (2) 69-77; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2000.008
Jessie L. Scott
1Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Forest Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
David R. Betters
2Professor, Department of Forest Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Akabari, A. S. Davis,
    2. S. Dorsano,
    3. J. Huang, and
    4. S. Winnett
    (Eds.). 1992. Cooling Our Communities: A Guidebook to Tree Planting and Light Colored Surfacing. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. 217 pp.
  2. ↵
    1. Anderson, L.M., and
    2. H.K. Cordell
    . 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (USA): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:153–164.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Cook, D.I.
    1978. Trees, solid barriers and combinations: Alternatives for noise control, pp 330–339. In Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference. State University of New York, NY.
  4. ↵
    1. Davis, L., and
    2. K.N. Johnson
    . 1987. Forest Management. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 280 pp.
  5. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.
    1991. Economic benefits and costs of urban forest, pp 58–58. In Alliances for Community Trees: Proceedings of the Fifth National Urban Forest Conference, American Forestry Association, Washington, DC.
  6. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J., and
    2. H.W. Schroeder
    . 1993. Social and economic benefits of the urban forest, pp 442–446. In Foresters Together: Meeting Tomorrow’s Challenges: Proceedings of the 1993 Society of American Foresters National Convention. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
  7. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.,
    2. H. Schroeder,
    3. J. Louviere, and
    4. D. Anderson
    . 1989. Urbanites’ willingness to pay for trees and forests in recreation areas. J. Arboric. 15(10):247–252.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers (CTLA). 1992. Guide for Plant Appraisal (8th ed.). International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL. 103 pp.
  9. ↵
    1. Harlow, W.M.,
    2. E.S. Harrar,
    3. J.W. Hardin, and
    4. F.M. White
    . 1996. Textbook of Dendrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 533 pp.
  10. ↵
    1. Heisler, G.
    1986. Energy savings with trees. J. Arboric. 12:113–125.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Jetter, K.,
    2. K. Klonsky, and
    3. C.H. Pickett
    . 1997. A cost/benefit analysis of the ash whitefly biological control program in California. J. Arboric. 23(2):65–71.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Li, M., and
    2. H. Brown
    . 1980. Micro-neighborhood externalities and hedonic housing prices. Land Econ. 56(2): 125–140.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Loomis, J.B.
    1993. Integrated Public Lands Management. Columbia University Press, New York, NY. 474 pp.
  14. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.
    1992. Accounting for benefits and costs of urban greenspace. Landscape Urban Plann. 22:41–51.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. D. Nowak
    . 1993. Value of urban greenspace for air quality improvement: Lincoln Park, Chicago. Arborist News. 2(6):30–32.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1993. Energy conservation potential of urban tree planting. J. Arboric. 19(6):321–331.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Miller, R.
    1997. Urban Forestry Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 480 pp.
  18. ↵
    1. Reethof, G., and
    2. O.H. McDaniel
    . 1978. Acoustics and the urban forest, pp 321–329. In Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference, State University of New York, NY.
  19. ↵
    1. Rowntree, R.A.
    1989. Ecological values of the urban forest, pp 22–25. In Proceedings of the Fourth Urban Forestry Conference, American Forestry Association, Washington, DC.
  20. ↵
    1. Vasievich, M.
    1999. Quick-Silver: An Economic Analysis Tool. North Central Research Station, USDA Forest Service, E. Lansing, MI. http://econ.usfs.msu.edu/qsilver.
  21. ↵
    1. Weicher, J., and
    2. R. Zerbst
    . 1973. The externalities of neighborhood parks: an empirical investigation. Land Econ. 49:99–105.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Zerbe, R.O., and
    2. D. Dively
    . 1994. Benefit-Cost Analysis: In Theory and Practice. Harper Collins, New York, NY.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 26 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 26, Issue 2
March 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Economic Analysis of Urban Tree Replacement Decisions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Economic Analysis of Urban Tree Replacement Decisions
Jessie L. Scott, David R. Betters
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2000, 26 (2) 69-77; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2000.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Economic Analysis of Urban Tree Replacement Decisions
Jessie L. Scott, David R. Betters
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2000, 26 (2) 69-77; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2000.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MEASURING THE BENEFITS OF URBAN TREES
    • ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    • THE ECONOMICS OF THE TREE REPLACEMENT PROBLEM
    • CASE STUDY: AN AMERICAN ELM ON THE “OVAL” AT COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    • SUMMARY
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Benefits
  • costs
  • tree removals

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire