Benefit-Cost Analysis of Modesto’s Municipal Urban Forest

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   1. Anderson, L.M., and
   2. H.K. Cordell

   . 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:153–164.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Benjamin, M.T., and
   2. A.M. Winer

   . 1998. Estimating the ozone-forming potential of urban trees and shrubs. Atmos. Environ. 32:53–68.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bernhardt, E., and
   2. T.J. Swiecki

   . 1993. The state of urban forestry in California: Results of the 1992 California urban forest survey. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Sacramento, CA.
4. ↵
   1. Brusca, J.

   1998. Personal communication. Streets Superintendent, City of Modesto, CA.
5. ↵
   California Department of Finance. 1998. City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1990-1998. State of California, Department of Finance, Sacramento, CA.
6. California Energy Commission. 1994. Electricity Report. State of California, Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA.
7. California EPA. 1998. Emission Reduction Offset Transaction Cost Summary Report for 1997. State of California, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
8. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. E.G. McPherson,
   3. H.W. Schroeder, and
   4. R.A. Rowntree

   . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. J. Arboric. 18:227–234.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Eubank, C.

   1995. City of Modesto Urban Forestry Benefits. City of Modesto Parks and Recreation Department, Modesto, CA.
10. ↵
    1. Gilstrap, C.

    1999. Personal communication. Operations and Maintenance Department, City of Modesto, CA.
11. ↵
    1. Hammer, T.T.,
    2. R. Coughlin, and
    3. E. Horn

    . 1974. The effect of a large urban park on real estate value. J. Am. Inst. Plann. July:274–275.
12. ↵
    1. Hofmann, A.

    1998. Personal communication. Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, Fresno, CA.
13. ↵
    1. Kimball, T.

    1999. Personal communication. Electric Division, Modesto Irrigation District, Modesto, CA.
14. ↵
    1. Lagarbo, A., and
    2. J. Brusca

    . 1996. Response to Survey on Street Tree Related Infrastructure Damage in California Cities. U.S. Forest Service, Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, Davis, CA.
15. ↵
    1. Marino, E.

    1999. Personal communication. Supervisor, Modesto Urban Forestry Division, Modesto, CA.
16. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. R.A. Rowntree

    . 1989. Using structural measures to compare twenty-two U.S. street tree populations. Landscape J. 8:13–23.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson

    . 1999. Carbon Dioxide Reduction Through Urban Forestry— Guidelines for Professional and Volunteer Tree Planters. General Technical Report PSW-171. U.S. Forest Service, Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, Davis, CA.
18. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. J.R. Simpson,
    3. P.J. Peper, and
    4. Q. Xiao

    . 1999. Tree Guidelines for San Joaquin Valley Communities. Local Government Commission. Sacramento, CA.
19. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. J.R. Simpson, and
    3. K.I. Scott

    . 1998. Estimating cost effectiveness of residential yard trees for improving air quality in Sacramento, California, using existing models. Atmos. Environ. 32:75–84.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Miller, R.W.

    1997. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21. ↵
    1. More, T.A.,
    2. T. Stevens, and
    3. P.G. Allen

    . 1988. Valuation of urban parks. Landscape Urban Plann. 15:139–152.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    PG&E.1998. Personal communication. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Residential Services Department.
23. ↵
    1. Peper, P.J., and
    2. E.G. McPherson

    . 1998. Comparison of five methods for estimating leaf area index of open-grown deciduous trees. J. Arboric. 24:98–111.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Peper, P.J., and
    2. S. Mori

    . Forthcoming. Growth estimates of street trees in Central California. U.S. Forest Service, Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, Davis, CA.
25. ↵
    1. Pillsbury, N.,
    2. J.L. Reimer, and
    3. R. Thompson

    . 1998. Tree volume equations for fifteen urban species in California. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.
26. ↵
    1. Richards, N.A.

    1982/83. Diversity and stability in a street tree population. Urb. Ecol. 7:159–171.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Rivera, J.

    1998. Personal communication. Industrial Waste Supervisor, City of Modesto, CA.
28. 1. Scott, K.I.,
    2. E.G. McPherson, and
    3. J.R. Simpson

    . 1998. Air pollutant uptake by Sacramento’s urban forest. J. Arboric. 24:224–234.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Schroeder, T.

    1982. The relationship of local park and recreation services to residential property values. J. Leisure Res. 14:223–234.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Simpson, J.R.

    Forthcoming. Impact of street trees on residential energy use in Modesto, CA. U.S. Forest Service, Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, Davis, CA.
31. ↵
    1. Taha, H.

    1996. Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos. Environ. 30:3423–3430.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. AP-42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (5th ed.). Volume I. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
33. ↵
    1. Xiao, Q.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. J.R. Simpson, and
    4. S.L. Ustin

    . 1998. Rainfall interception by Sacramento’s urban forest. J. Arboric. 24:235–244.

    OpenUrl