Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Benefit-Cost Analysis of Modesto’s Municipal Urban Forest

E. Gregory McPherson, James R. Simpson, Paula J. Peper and Qingfu Xiao
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1999, 25 (5) 235-248; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1999.033
E. Gregory McPherson
1Western Center for Urban Forest, Research and Education, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest, Research Station, c/o Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California Davis, CA 95616-8587
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Simpson
1Western Center for Urban Forest, Research and Education, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest, Research Station, c/o Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California Davis, CA 95616-8587
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula J. Peper
1Western Center for Urban Forest, Research and Education, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest, Research Station, c/o Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California Davis, CA 95616-8587
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingfu Xiao
2Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    The age structure for the category All Street Trees showed a relatively low percentage of young trees (e.g., Callery pear) to replace an abundance of older trees, such as Modesto ash and sycamore/plane.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Modesto ash accounted for 14% of the street tree population and produced 22% of total benefits. Because of their relatively old age and large size, they make a substantial contribution to airquality improvements. Also, Modesto ash is a low emitter of BVOCs (Benjamin and Winer 1998). Unlike air-quality benefits that reflect the total amount of leaf area, aesthetic and other benefits depend on the rate that leaf area is added and are relatively more important than air-quality benefits for more recently planted species such as the Callery pear.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Annual benefits per tree varied with tree species, depending on size and growth rate. On average, benefits increased from $20 for 5-year-old trees to $100 for trees 5 years and older. For young trees, rapid-growing species such as sycamore/plane and Raywood ash produced the greatest annual benefits per tree. For old trees, species such as silver maple, honeylocust, Moraine ash, and hackberry produced the greatest benefits because they continue growing long after planting.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Emissions factors and transaction costs for CO2 and criteria air pollutants.

    Emission factorz
    Electricity kg/MWhNatural gas lb/MBtuControl $/kg
    CO218175.70.033y
    NO20.3730.079711.03x
    PM100.0250.00496.98x
    VOCs0.0230.00356.13x
    • ↵z U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1995.

    • ↵y California Energy Commission 1994 ($30/ton).

    • ↵x California EPA, 1998.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Structural features of Modesto’s street trees

    Tree numbersBasal areaLeaf areaCanopy cover
    No.% totalm2% total1,000 m2% total1,000 m2% total
    Modesto ash10,59214.031032.84,99928.41,44624.1
    Chinese pistache9,70912.8555.81,5578.869211.5
    Callery pear8,01910.6313.37184.12874.8
    Zelkova5,0466.7343.68314.73806.3
    Chinese hackberry4,6626.2667.01,6109.15208.7
    Hesse ash4,0825.491.01731.0781.3
    Raywood ash3,9535.2414.38694.92564.3
    Marshall ash3,4644.6151.64882.82063.4
    Ginkgo3,4344.5151.62851.6921.5
    Sweetgum2,9563.9262.76263.61382.3
    Moraine ash2,9213.9687.21,0946.23175.3
    Honeylocust2,9163.9495.29015.14026.7
    Sycamore/plane2,0392.7333.56583.72454.1
    Silver maple1,2541.7838.71,1476.52764.6
    Other street trees10,58214.011011.61,6689.566311.0
    Total street trees75,629100.0947100.017,624100.05,997100.0
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    FY 1997–1998 expenditures and revenues for Modesto, California.

    Expenditure
    Tree establishment
    Planting$167,062
    Irrigation/pruning75,136
    Basin repairs15,200
    Nursery13,693
    Subtotal$271,090
    Mature tree care
    Pruning$1,127,117
    Tree and stump removal342,896
    Root pruning and barriers85,208
    IPM67,747
    Storm clean-up4,874
    Subtotal$1,627,842
    Administration
    Supervisory and clerical staff$315,572
    Other expenditures
    Sidewalk and curb repair$297,586
    Leaf clean-up106,426
    Claims68,000
    Total expenditures$2,686,516
    Revenue
    Service credits$10,132
    Development fees46,000
    Contracts7,000
    Total revenue$63,132
    Net expenditures$2,623,384
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    The value of annual benefits from Modesto’s municipal forest.

    Benefit categoryTotal $% of total benefitAvg $/tree
    Environmental
    Energy1,000,56020.210.97
    CO2449,4459.14.93
    Air quality1,442,03629.115.82
    Stormwater616,13912.46.76
    Environmental subtotal3,508,18070.738.48
    Aesthetic and other1,455,63629.315.96
    Total benefits4,963,816100.054.44
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 25, Issue 5
September 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Modesto’s Municipal Urban Forest
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Modesto’s Municipal Urban Forest
E. Gregory McPherson, James R. Simpson, Paula J. Peper, Qingfu Xiao
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1999, 25 (5) 235-248; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1999.033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Benefit-Cost Analysis of Modesto’s Municipal Urban Forest
E. Gregory McPherson, James R. Simpson, Paula J. Peper, Qingfu Xiao
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1999, 25 (5) 235-248; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1999.033
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Urban forest valuation
  • economic analysis
  • natural resource economics

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire