Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Tree Lilac Cultivars Tested as Street Trees: Initial Results

Henry D. Gerhold
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1999, 25 (4) 185-188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1999.25.4.185
Henry D. Gerhold
School of Forest Resources, Penn State University, 109 Ferguson Building University Park, PA 16802
Roles: Professor of Forest Genetics
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Three Japanese tree lilac (Syringa reticulata) cultivars, 2 each in 11 communities, were planted for evaluation as street trees. Cooperators in the Municipal Tree Restoration Program using standardized methods measured them annually for 3 years, and periodically afterwards. ‘Ivory Silk’, ‘Regent’, and ‘Summer Snow’ performed well at all locations. All 3 cultivars grew slowly initially, and their foliage tended to turn yellow in late summer. Height growth of ‘Summer Snow’, reputed to be slower than ‘Ivory Silk’, was not slower at all locations.

Key Words
  • Tree lilac
  • Syringa reticulata;
  • ‘Ivory Silk’
  • ‘Regent’
  • ‘Summer Snow’
  • street trees
  • performance testing

Japanese tree lilac (Syringa reticulata) cultivars are being evaluated as part of the Municipal Tree Restoration Program. MTRP encourages municipalities to improve their tree programs and provides information to help decision-makers select appropriate cultivars for planting under utility wires. Free trees purchased with utility funds serve as an incentive for communities to participate.. Initial results of performance tests of crabapple (Malus), Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), and serviceberry (Amelanchier) cultivars were reported previously (Gerhold et al. 1994; Gerhold and McElroy 1994; Gerhold 1999).

Earlier research comparing landscape trees (Reisch et al. 1971; Ticknor 1971; Mower 1973; and Kozel 1974) led to the proposal of a cooperative performance testing system for street tree cultivars (Gerhold and Bartoe 1976; Gerhold 1985). The statistical design was based on measurements of 23 cultivars supplied by municipal arborists in Iowa, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington (Bartoe 1977).

Methods

Ten communities in Pennsylvania and 2 in New York planted the tree lilacs represented in this report. Community representatives chose the planting sites with assistance from utility foresters, service foresters, and Extension urban foresters; 2 of these usually assisted each community. A typical cultivar performance test consisted of 2 cultivars planted alternately within 4 to 10 plots that could contain 4 to 16 trees each, a total of 50 trees. All test trees were planted along streets and under electric conductors; the utility company arranged for removal of large trees that interfered with utility lines. Both cultivars for a community were ordered B&B from the same nursery, with calipers of 4.4 to 5.1 cm (1.75 to 2 in.); heights ranged from 2.4 to 3.7 m (8 to 12 ft).

The cultivar tests were planted between 1987 and 1996. A trained cooperator inspected and measured the trees annually during the first 3 years, and then at 3-year intervals in most cases. During September or October, a service forester or Extension urban forester used standardized methods to measure tree height, trunk diameter, and crown width, and to classify foliage health, branch health, trunk health, maintenance needs, and overall quality. Causes of damage such as disease, insects, drought, and mechanical injuries also were recorded.

An analysis of variance (MINITAB General Linear Model) was conducted on each type of quantitative data from the 2 cultivars in a community to calculate means and determine significance of differences. Each test location in every year was treated as a separate experiment with plots providing replication. These results, along with written comments of cooperators, were used to characterize performance of the cultivars.

Results

At most locations, the tree lilacs grew slowly for the first 3 or more years, and then the rate of height and diameter growth increased. The pattern of growth at Corry was typical of most locations (Figure 1); only at Lebanon did more rapid growth start in the second year after planting. Survival rates 6 or 9 years after planting were 88% to 100% at all locations, except one where trees were vandalized.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Height growth of ‘Ivory Silk’ (IS) and ‘Summer Snow’ (SS) tree lilacs at Lebanon (Test 18) and Corry (Test 20).

Significant differences between cultivars in trunk diameter, tree height, and crown width were found at several locations (Table 1). In some cases (Corry and Camp Hill), these differences already were present at the time of planting, indicating they were not matched in size when they left the nursery. In the remaining comparisons the size differences were modest, except at Westfield where ‘Ivory Silk’ was 1.5 m (5 ft) taller than ‘Summer Snow’ 9 years after planting.

View this table:
Table 1.

Growth, health, and overall ratings of Japanese tree lilac cultivars, derived from data collected until the second year to the tenth year after planting. Average trunk diameter, tree height, and crown width are in the most advanced year; foliage health, branch health, and overall ratings are averaged over all years.

The foliage of all 3 cultivars tended to turn yellow in late summer before other species showed fall colors. The yellowing occurred especially on more stressful sites, whereas individual trees that had been well watered or growing in spacious areas remained green longer. Some cooperators regarded yellow leaves to be a sign of poor health. For this reason, foliage health ratings below 4.0 (more than 20% of foliage affected) were common, but there were few significant differences between cultivars and no severe disease or insect injuries.

Differences among cultivars in branch health, trunk health, and maintenance needs (not shown) were uncommon and transient. They were caused mainly by mechanical damage. Dieback of terminal branches commonly occurred during the first few years as trees were becoming established.

Overall ratings also were variable, inconsistent, and generally differed by less than 1.0. However at Athens, ‘Summer Snow’ was consistently rated above ‘Ivory Silk’. The service forester who measured these trees reported that he liked the yellow foliage of ‘Summer Snow’, which turned color earlier, and its somewhat larger, more robust crowns.

Conclusions

All 3 cultivars performed well, including ‘Summer Snow’, which is reputed to be slower growing but was not at all locations. The initial slow growth and even some dieback of these cultivars was the only real disadvantage, compared to other species used as street trees. The tendency of foliage to turn yellow before the onset of fall coloration by other species is perceived as a sickly appearance by some, but alternatively may be regarded as an attraction in the landscape.

Acknowledgements

Financial support for the Municipal Tree Restoration Program was provided by utility companies through the Pennsylvania Electric Energy Research Council and by donations of arboricultural firms: ACRT, Allegheny Power Systems, Asplundh Tree Expert Co., Bartlett Tree Expert Co., Davey Tree Expert Co., Duquesne Light, Environmental Consultants Inc., GPU Energy, Hazlett Tree Service, Penn Power, Pennsylvania Power & Light, and UGI Corporation. Service Foresters of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, and Extension Urban Foresters of Penn State University assisted with community liaison and tree measurements.

  • © 1999, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. ↵
    1. Bartoe, D.W, II.
    . 1977. Statistical designs for evaluating and comparing street tree cultivars. M.S. thesis, Penn State Univ., University Park PA 16802. 98 pp.
  2. ↵
    1. Gerhold, H.D.
    1985 Performance testing of street tree cultivars: A model project. J. Arboric. 11(9):263–271.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Gerhold, H.D.
    1999 Serviceberry cultivars tested as street trees: Initial results. J. Arboric. 25(4):189–192.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Gerhold, H.D., and
    2. W.D. Bartoe II.
    . 1976. Performance testing tree cultivars in metropolitan environments. J. Arboric. 2(12):221–227.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Gerhold, H.D., and
    2. H.L. McElroy
    . 1994. Callery pear cultivars tested as street trees: Initial results. J. Arboric. 20(5):259–261.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Gerhold, H.D.,
    2. H.L. McElroy, and
    3. H.L.H. Rhodes
    . 1994. Street tree performance tests of crabapple cultivars: Initial results. J. Arboric. 20(2):87–93.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Kozel, P.C.
    1974 Shade trees for suburban and city arboriculture. HortScience 9(6):515–518.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Mower, R.G.
    1973 Some observations on street tree plantings. Proc. Intl. Shade Tree Conf. 49:49–55.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Reisch, K.W.,
    2. G. Hull, and
    3. H.M. Hill
    . 1971. Case histories of several street tree species and cultivars at selected sites in five Ohio cities. Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Ctr., Hort. Dept. Series 376, 65 pp.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Ticknor, R.L.
    1971 Landscape tree performance. Oregon State Univ., Agric. Exp. Sta., Circular of Information 633, 11 pp.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 25, Issue 4
July 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tree Lilac Cultivars Tested as Street Trees: Initial Results
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Tree Lilac Cultivars Tested as Street Trees: Initial Results
Henry D. Gerhold
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1999, 25 (4) 185-188; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1999.25.4.185

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tree Lilac Cultivars Tested as Street Trees: Initial Results
Henry D. Gerhold
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1999, 25 (4) 185-188; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1999.25.4.185
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgements
    • Literature Cited
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Tree lilac
  • Syringa reticulata;
  • ‘Ivory Silk’
  • ‘Regent’
  • ‘Summer Snow’
  • street trees
  • performance testing

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire