Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
PreprintArticles

Patterns of Structural Failures in Urban Trees: Coast Live Oak (Quercus Agrifoua)

Roger Edberg and Alison Berry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1999, 25 (1) 48-55; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1999.008
Roger Edberg
1Assistant Superintendent of Grounds, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Berry
2Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of California, Davis, CA 95616,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Failure of Q. agrifolia in San Luis Obispo County, California. The tree had a dbh of 100 cm (40.5 in.). It failed at the roots during heavy spring rains, with soggy soil and gusty winds. The failed tree had been growing in a residential setting that was a native stand prior to human occupancy (visible in the background). Note the soil disturbances: Herbaceous ornamentals were planted around the base of the tree, requiring irrigation on the trunk and root system; and vehicle traffic, parked cars, etc. extended almost to the trunk. Root decay was present. This photo was taken by CTFRP cooperator Ted Elder 1 to 2 months after the failure.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Frequency of location of failure (%) by tree group. Failure location percentage also divided into failures occurring at ground level (trunk) plus below (root) and failures occurring above ground (trunk above ground level and branch).

    Location of failureQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)28.930.628.123.633.831.3
    Branch (%)26.434.253.055.035.133.8
    Root (%)44.635.218.921.431.135.0
    Ground level and below (%)54.045.024.025.035.045.0
    Above ground level (%)46.055.076.075.065.055.0
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Location of failure vs. percentage (of group total) associated with decay (all decay types combined).

    DecayQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)976550407179
    Branch (%)733328136280
    Root (%)786951379196
    All locations (%)835539247586
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Chi2 probabilities from 32 individual 2 × 2 matrices. Decay (presence or absence) by tree group (pairwise).

    DecayQa × HWQa × QlQa × Q otherQa × eucAllOak × HWHW× conHW× eucEuc × con
    Trunk<0.0010.010.07<0.001<0.001< 0.0010.09NSD
    Branch<0.001NSDNSD< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001NSD< 0.001
    RootNSDNSD0.070.02< 0.001< 0.0010.06NSD
    All locations< 0.001NSDNSD< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001
    • Qa = Q. agrifolia, Ql = Q. lobata, Q other = Quercus other, euc = eucalyptus, con = conifer, HW = hardwood.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Structural defects most frequently associated with failure. Percentage is of the total number of failures for each tree group.

    Top threeQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    1Failed portion dead (root) 11.2%Heavy lateral limbs (branch) 9.2%Heavy lateral limbs (branch) 18.5%Heavy lateral limbs (branch) 36.5%Heavy lateral limbs (branch) 9.6%Heavy lateral limbs (branch) 17.7%
    2Multiple trunks/ codominant stems (trunk) 8.6%Multiple trunks/ codominant stems (trunk) 8.7%None (branch) 9.8%Multiple trunks/codominant stems (trunk) 6.3%Failed portion dead (root) 8.2%Failed portion dead (trunk) 11.4%
    3Failed portion dead (trunk) 7.8%Failed portion dead (trunk) 6.5%Multiple branches one point (branch) 8.7%Multiple trunks/ codominant stems (branch) 6.3%Heavy lateral limb (trunk) 5.5%None (root) 8.9%
    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Percentage of failures associated with precipitation for each location of failure (root, trunk, or branch) and for all locations grouped (all failure locations). Rain, fog, and snow are combined.

    Location of failureQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)18373957959
    Branch (%)101743602648
    Root (%)736673576569
    All locations (%)404048593459
    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Percentage of failures for each location of failure and for all locations grouped by wind speeds less than or equal to 5 mph (8 kph).

    Location of failureQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)521728247359
    Branch (%)633228285253
    Root (%)36812174617
    All locations (%)491925255736
    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Percentage of failures associated with saturated soil, by failure location.

    Location of failureQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)244544
    Branch (%)1251135
    Root (%)2719571112
    All locations (%)302514231821
    • View popup
    Table 8.

    Grade change—cut or fill versus other choices combined from the report form field “site topography.” Percentage of failures at each location associated with a grade change.

    Location of failureQ. agrifoliaHardwoodsEucalyptusConifersQ. lobataOther oaks
    Trunk (%)7.61.61.81.15.85.5
    Branch (%)7.61.01.02.58.75.5
    Root (%)14.41.61.82.311.69.6
    All locations (%)29.64.24.65.926.120.6
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 25, Issue 1
January 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of Structural Failures in Urban Trees: Coast Live Oak (Quercus Agrifoua)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Patterns of Structural Failures in Urban Trees: Coast Live Oak (Quercus Agrifoua)
Roger Edberg, Alison Berry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1999, 25 (1) 48-55; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1999.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patterns of Structural Failures in Urban Trees: Coast Live Oak (Quercus Agrifoua)
Roger Edberg, Alison Berry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1999, 25 (1) 48-55; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1999.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Location of Failure
    • Decay
    • Structural Defects
    • Environmental Conditions at Time of Failure
    • Discussion
    • Management Strategies
    • Acknowledgements
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire