Root Barrier and Extension Casing Effects on Chinese Hackberry

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   1. Barker, P.A.

   1992. Control of root morphogenesis in two sycamore species, Platanus acerifolia and P. wrightii, pp 567–568. In American Forestry—An Evolving Tradition. Proceedings of the 1992 Society of American Foresters National Convention, Richmond, VA. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
2. ↵
   1. Barker, P.A.

   1995a. Managed development of tree roots. I. Ultra-deep rootball and root barrier effects on European hackberry. J. Arboric. 21:203–207.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Barker, P.A.

   1995b. Managed development of tree roots. II. Ultra-deep rootball and root barrier effects on Southwestern black cherry. J. Arboric. 21:251–258.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Costello, L.R.,
   2. C.L. Elmore, and
   3. S. Steinmaus

   . 1997. Tree root response to circling root barriers. J. Arboric. 23:211–218.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Daddow, R.L., and
   2. G.E. Warrington

   . 1983. Growthlimiting soil bulk densities as influenced by soil texture. US Forest Service, WSDG Report, WSDG-TN-00005. 17 pp.
6. 1. Gilman, E.F., and
   2. M.E. Kane

   . 1990. Root growth of red maple following planting from containers in two different soils. HortScience. 25:527528.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.E

   1995. Root barriers affect root distribution. J. Arboric. 22:151–154.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Goldstein, J.,
   2. N. Bassuk,
   3. E Lindsey, and
   4. J. Urban

   . 1991. From the ground down. Landscape Architecture. 81:66–68.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Grabosky, J., and
   2. N. Bassuk

   . 1995. A new urban tree soil to safely increase rooting volumes under sidewalks. J. Arboric. 21:187–201.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. D. Neely

    1. Kopinga, J.

    1995. Aspects of the damage to asphalt road pavings caused by tree roots, pp 165–178. In Watson, G.W., and D. Neely (Eds.). The Landscape Below Ground: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Tree Root Development in Urban Soils. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
11. 1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. PJ. Peper

    . (Unpublished data). Survey of California cities: Costs associated with street tree damage to sidewalks and other infrastructure elements. US Forest Service, PSW, Western Center for Urban Forest Research, Davis, CA.
12. ↵
    1. Neely, D., and
    2. G.W. Watson

    1. Peper, P.J.

    1998. Comparison of root barriers installed at two depths for reduction of white mulberry roots in the soil surface, pp 82–94. In Neely, D., and G.W. Watson (Eds.). The Landscape Below Ground II: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Tree Root Development in Urban Soils. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, IL.
13. 1. Rolf, K., and
    2. O. Stal

    . 1994. Tree roots in sewer systems in Malmo, Sweden. J. Arboric. 20:329–335.

    OpenUrl
14. Sealana and Associates. 1994. City of San Jose Sidewalk Survey and Analysis Study. City of San Jose, Department of Streets and Parks, San Jose, CA.
15. ↵
    Soil Conservation Service. 1977. Soil survey of Solano County, California. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Davis, CA. 65 pp.
16. 1. Urban, J.R.

    1989. Evaluating urban tree planting practices to determine the limitations of trees in the urban landscape. National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC.
17. ↵
    1. Urban, J.R.

    1994. Root barriers: An evaluation. Landsc. Arch. 84(9):28–31.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Wagar, J.A.

    1985. Reducing surface rooting of trees with control planters and wells. J. Arboric. 11:165–171.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Wagar, J.A., and
    2. P.A. Barker

    . 1983. Tree root damage to sidewalks and curbs. J. Arboric. 9:177–181.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Wagar, J.A., and
    2. P.A. Barker

    . 1993. Effectiveness of three barrier materials for stopping regenerating roots of established trees. J. Arboric. 19:332–338.

    OpenUrl