Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Foliar nutrient comparisons between chlorotic and healthy eastern white pine trees. A. Macronutrients; B. Micronutrients. Macronutrient concentrations are expressed as %, and micronutrients as ppm, based on a dry tissue weight basis.
Tables
Healthy Chlorotic Identifier Avg. pH n Identifier Avg. pH n H-1980-1 7.7 4 C-1980-1 7.7 3 H-1980-2 7.9 4 C-1980-2 8.1 3 H-1980-3 7.2 4 C-1980-3 7.2 3 H-1982-1a* 4.7 3 C-1982-1 7.5 3 H-1982-6b 5.5 3 H-1982-11c 6.8 3 H-1982-16d 6.6 3 H-1989-1 5.8 4 C-1989-1 7.6 4 H-1989-2 5.5 4 C-1989-2 7.9 4 H-1989-3 5.7 4 C-1989-3 7.8 4 H-1989-4 5.5 4 C-1989-4 7.9 4 H-1989-5 5.4 4 C-1989-5 7.8 4 H-1992-1 5.8 3 C-1992-1 7.5 3 H-1992-2 5.8 3 C-1992-2 7.7 3 H-1992-3 5.9 3 C-1992-3 7.6 3 H-1992-4 5.6 3 C-1992-4 7.6 3 H-1992-5 5.5 3 C-1992-5 7.5 3 C-1992-6 7.5 3 Note that the sample numbers indicate replicates (sample numbers which correspond between healthy and chlorotic trees are not side-by-side comparisons).
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.