Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Vitality, Variation, and Causes of Decline of Trees in Oslo Center (Norway)

Oddmund Fostad and Per Anker Pedersen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1997, 23 (4) 155-166; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1997.024
Oddmund Fostad
Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Box 5022, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Roles: Ph. D. candidate
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Anker Pedersen
Department of Horticulture and Crop Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Box 5022, N-1432 Ås, Norway
Roles: Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    General impression of tree vitality in Oslo center 1990 by percentage distribution.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Foliar contents of chloride and sodium (percent of dry weight) in A. hippocastanum among different injury groups. Mean value of samples from two months in 1991, and four months in 1993

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Recording parameters for the study of trees in Oslo center.

    ParameterScoreDescription
    general impression0dead
    5moderate vigor
    9excellent vigor
    leaf necrosis0no leaf injury
    9severe injury on all leaves
    attack by insects and/or mites0no attack
    9whole crown affected
    dieback of twigs and branches0no dieback
    9whole crown dead
    stem injury0no visible injury
    9extensive and Dotentiallv lethal iniurv
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean scores for species frequently used as park and street trees in Oslo, 1989-1993.

    SpeciesGeneral impressionLeaf necrosisPest attackDieback of twigs and branches
    StreetParkStreetParkStreetParkStreetPark
    A. platanoides4.9c6.4ab2.0b0.2b0.5d2.0b2.4a0.2a
    A. pseudoplatanus4.7c6.7ab2.7a0.1b1.1c1.3b2.4a0.0a
    A. hippocastanum5.8b7.2a3.3a0.3ab0.1e1.0b0.4c0.0a
    B. pendula5.7b5.9b0.5c0.6a0.3d0.0c1.0b0.1a
    T. platyphyllos6.5a6.5ab0.1c0.1b3.9a3.8a1.1b0.0a
    T. x vulgaris6.5a6.3b0.1c0.0b3.1b2.9a1.1b0.2a
    Mean (weighted)5.86.51.70.21.31.91.10.1
    • - Scale 0-9

    • - Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at p=0.05

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Variation in street tree leaf edge necrosis during survey period 1989-1993.

    Species19891990199119921993
    MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
    A. platanoides2.1b1.62.3b1.62.5b2.11.5c1.91.4b1.6
    A. pseudoplatanus2.8a1.93.5a2.43.4a2.72.3b1.81.7b1.7
    A. hippocastanum3.1a2.13.3a3.23.Oab2.63.9a2.82.8a2.8
    B. pendula0.3c0.60.8c1.70.3c0.80.0d0.00.0c0.0
    T. platyphyllos0.3c0.50.1c0.50.1c0.30.0d0.20.0c0.0
    T. x vulgaris0.2c0.40.3c0.70.0c0.00.0d0.20.0c0.0
    Mean (weighted)1.72.01.92.61.62.41.92.60.61.2
    • - Scale 0-9

    • - Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at p=0.05

    • - SD-standard deviation

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Street tree attack by insects and mites from 1989 to 1993.

    Species19891990199119921993
    MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
    A. platanoides1.4c1.60.9d1.00.1b0.30.3c0.80.0d0.0
    A. pseudoplatanus2.1b0.92.5c1.00.0b0.00.1c0.31.0c1.0
    A. hippocastanum0.2d0.70.0e0.00.0b0.00.0c0.00.0d0.0
    B. pendula0.2d0.70.6d1.40.1b0.40.0c0.00.0d0.0
    T. platyphyllos4.3a1.46.8a1.72.2a1.62.5a1.74.1a2.0
    T. x vulgaris4.0a1.34.6b2.42.1a1.01.7b1.12.9b1.7
    Mean (weighted)1.82.02.22.80.71.20.81.32.22.2
    • - Scale 0-9

    • - Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at p=0.05

    • - SD-standard deviation

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Contents of foliar elements in leaves from A. platanoides, A. hippocastanum, and Tilia spp. in the street and park environment (1991).

    -------------------g/kg dry wt.--------------------mg/kg dry wt.---
    NPKNaMgClPbFeCd
    STREET TREES:
    A. platanoides16.8c2.0a17.6a0.3b1.9b8.6b8.6b193.3b0.10a
    A. hippocastanum19.0b1.7aI4.9ab4.9a2.2b13.5a6.0b281.7b0.03b
    Tilia s¤p.24.2a1.8a12.5b0.9b3.7a6.1b11.2a474.4a0.05b
    PARK TREES:
    A. platanoides19.8b1.5a10.2a0.2a2.1b2.6a1.7b120.7b0.08a
    A. hippocastanum25.2a2.0a11.1a0.2a2.9b1.3b2.6a221,0a0.03b
    Tilia spp.27.8a1.7a10.2a0.2a4.0a2.5a2.8a211.7a0.04b
    • - Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at p=0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    pH and chemical contents (mg/l dry weight) in soil collected along streets and parks in the Oslo center.

    pHPbK-ALMg-ALCa-ALNa-ALP-AL
    Streets7.2181212185672777192
    Parks6.471270161298522128
    • - Mean content of the year 1989 and 1990

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 23, Issue 4
July 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vitality, Variation, and Causes of Decline of Trees in Oslo Center (Norway)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Vitality, Variation, and Causes of Decline of Trees in Oslo Center (Norway)
Oddmund Fostad, Per Anker Pedersen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1997, 23 (4) 155-166; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vitality, Variation, and Causes of Decline of Trees in Oslo Center (Norway)
Oddmund Fostad, Per Anker Pedersen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1997, 23 (4) 155-166; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.024
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Urban Trees
  • frequency of species
  • vigor
  • causes of decline
  • leaf injury
  • intraspecific variation

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire