Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Inoculations of Established Residential Trees

E. Thomas Smiley, Donald H. Marx and Bruce R. Fraedrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1997, 23 (3) 113-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1997.018
E. Thomas Smiley
1Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald H. Marx
2Plant Health Care, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce R. Fraedrich
1Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories, Charlotte, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Trees growing in forest soils have abundant mycorrhizae. This association increases nutrient and water absorption, increase tolerance to stresses, decreases root disease and is, therefore, important in maintenance of forest health and vigor (1). Certain species of ectomy-corrhizae improve survival and growth of pine and oak seedlings on clear-cut reforestation sites, on forestation sites in the tropics, and on adverse sites, such as coal mined lands and borrow pits (2). The application of mycorrhizal technology in forestry and mine reclamation is at the commercial level.

Recently, a preliminary study showed that the fine roots and ectomycorrhizal development were significantly increased by inoculation with spores of Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt) on 25 to 46 cm caliper (10 to 18 in.) northern red oak (Quercus rubra) trees growing on a man-made landscape in Michigan (3). There is an obvious need to further test the application of mycorrhizal fungi on established landscape trees. The purpose of this project was to determine if inoculations with spores of Pt alone or in combination with slow release nitrogen fertilizer, would improve the density or development of fine roots and ectomycorrhizae on established residential trees. A secondary goal was to determine if there was significant supplantation of the naturally-occurring ectomycorrhizae on treated trees.

Methods

Listen

Plots consisted of three mature willow oaks (Quercusphelloś), one northern red oak (Q. rubra), and one pecan (Carya illinoinensis) in an abandoned but maintained neighborhood near the Charlotte Douglas Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina. All trees were surrounded by turf. Trunk diameter at 1.3 m (4.5 ft.) above the ground line ranged from 56 to 71 cm (22 in. to 28 in.). Soil was a clay loam with pH ranging from 5.1 to 7.1.

Treatments consisted of the following soil injections:

  1. MycorTree™ Pt Injectable at a rate of 114 g per 378 I (1/4 lb. per 100 gal.) of water

  2. MycorTree™ Pt Injectable at the same rate plus Bartlett Boost® (28-9-9) at a rate of 18 kg per 378 I (40 lbs. per 100 gal.) of water

  3. Bartlett Boost® (28-9-9) slow release fertilizer at a rate of 18 kg per 378 I (40 lbs. per 100 gallons) of water

  4. Water control

Quadrants beneath the dripline of each tree were randomly assigned to each treatment. Injections were made to a depth of 20 cm (8 in.) on a 0.9 m by 0.9 m (3 ft. by 3 ft.) spacing. Injection pressure was 10 bars (150 psi) and 1.91 (0.5 gal.) of the treatment solution was injected into each hole. Application rates were 2.7 kg (6 lbs.) of nitrogen, 0.9 kg (2 lbs.) of P2O5, 0.9 kg (2 lbs.) of K2O, and 2.7 billion spores of P. tinctorius per 90 sq. m (1000 sq. ft.). Injection holes were marked with color coded flags to indicate location of treatment. Treatments were made March 13,1995.

Root Ingrowth Cores (RICs) were installed March 16,1995 to monitor new root development (4). RICs are 7.6 cm (3 in.) diameter by 20 cm (8 in.) deep plastic screen cages which allow ingrowth of roots. They were filled with root-free, treated soil, and were located within 15 cm (6 in.) of an injection site.

Roundup® herbicide was applied periodically to the treatment area to eliminate grass root contamination. Five RICs per treatment were removed four months after treatment on July 18 and seven months after treatment on October 23, 1995. Soil was separated from the roots via dry screening and washing. The percentages of each root sample colonized by P. tinctorius and naturally-occurring ectomycorrhizal fungi was visually estimated on October 24, 1995. P. tinctorius is morphologically distinct with a mustard yellow color, pitted mantle and many yellow hyphal strands. Roots were dried for two days at 50°C and weighed to determine the amount of fine root growth into each RIC.

Results and Discussion

Listen

Fertilizer, MycorTree™ Pt Injectable and the combination of the two, all produced a significant and rapid increase in fine root growth and ectomycorrhizal development as compared to the control treatment (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Average Fine root dry weights, expressed in grams per cubic foot of soil, four and seven months after treatment.

Both treatments that contained Pt did produce a slight but consistent suppression in the development of naturally-occurring ectomycorrhizae (Table 2). However, the total amount of ectomycorrhizae was greatly increased following application of Pt. Ectomycorrhizae, whether they be natural or from inoculation, increased on two of the three tree species when fertilizer was applied. The control treatment had the lowest levels of mycorrhizae development and the lowest amount of new fine root growth.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Average mycorrhizal colonization rates seven months after treatment. Numbers are percent ectomycorrhizal colonization from Pisolithus tinctorius (Pt) or other naturally occurring ectomycorrhizae (Nat), and the combination of the two (Tot).

The combined increase in fine root density and ectomycorrhizae colonization rates should improve water and nutrient absorption. This in turn should result in healthier trees, more capable of tolerating the effects of drought, root disease and low soil fertility.

Although the scope of this study was limited, in field operations, application of mycorrhizae should be considered as a potential alternative to fertilizer to stimulate fine root and ectomycorrhizae development, where natural mycorrhizae are suppressed due to poor soil conditions. Inoculations can also be considered in sensitive areas such as near surface water, on young trees where rapid top growth should not be encouraged, on trees in confined growing space, in “all natural” programs, and on trees with root disease, especially those caused by Phytophthora. Additional research is required to confirm these recommendations.

Acknowledgements

Listen

Thanks to Grady Burgin, Laura Johnson and Lynn Roberts of the Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory; Selina Marx of Plant Health Care Inc; and Jerry Orr, Manager of the Charlotte Douglas Airport for their assistance with this project.

Round-up® is a trademark of the Monsanto Co.; MycorTree™ is a trademark of Plant Health Care, Inc.; Bartlett Boost® is a trademark of the F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co.

  • © 1997, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

Listen
  1. 1.↵
    1. Hacskaylo, E.
    (Ed). 1971.Mycorrhizae. Proc. First N. Amer. Conf. On Mycorrhizae. US Dept. Agric. For. Ser. Misc. Publ. 1189. 255 p.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Marx, D.H.
    1991. The practical significance of ectomycorrhizae in forest establishment, pp. 54-90. In Ecophysiology of ectomycorrhizae of forest trees. The Marcus Wallenberg Foundation Symposia Proceedings 7. Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Marx, D.H.,
    2. M.D.Pettway, and
    3. R.D.Mellick
    . 1995a. A study focuses on ectomycorrhizal fungi. Tree Care Industry. 6(8):29–32.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Marx, D.H.,
    2. S.S.Sung,
    3. J.S.Cunningham,
    4. M.D.Thompson, and
    5. L.M.White
    . 1995b. A method to study response of large trees to different amounts of available soil water. USDA-SRS Res. Paper SE-370. 16 p.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Inoculations of Established Residential Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Inoculations of Established Residential Trees
E. Thomas Smiley, Donald H. Marx, Bruce R. Fraedrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1997, 23 (3) 113-115; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Inoculations of Established Residential Trees
E. Thomas Smiley, Donald H. Marx, Bruce R. Fraedrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1997, 23 (3) 113-115; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.018
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire