Potential Defoliation of Trees by Outbreak Populations of Gypsy Moth in the Chicago Area

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Allen, D.C.

   1984. Environmental effects of insect defoliation. J. Arboric. 10:97–103.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Appelt, P.

   1985. A new eradication strategy for small, remote gypsy moth infestations. J. Arboric. 11:242–246.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Baker, W.L., and
   2. A.C. Cline

   . 1936. A study of the gypsy moth in the town of Petersham, Mass., in 1935. J. Forestry 34:759–765.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Doane, C.C., and
   2. M.L. McManus

   . 1981. The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management. Technical Bulletin 1584. USDA Forest Service, Science and Education Agency, APHIS.
5. 5.↵
   1. Dreistadt, S.H.,
   2. D.L. Dahlsten, and
   3. G.W. Frankie

   . 1990. Urban forests and insect ecology. BioScience 40:192–198.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 6.↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. E.G. McPherson,
   3. H.W. Schroeder, and
   4. R.A. Rowntree

   . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. J. Arboric. 18:227–234.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Flint, H.L.

   1985. Plants showing tolerance of urban stress. J. Environ. Hortic. 3:85–89.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Gerardi, M.H., and
   2. J.K. Grimm

   . 1979. The history, biology, damage, and control of the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (L.). Fairleigh Dickinson Univ. Press. Rutherford, NJ.
9. 9.↵
   1. Gottschalk, K.W.

   1993. Silvicultural guidelines for forest stands threatened by the gypsy moth. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-171. NE Forest Expt. Station.
10. 10.↵
    1. Anderson, J.F., and
    2. H.K. Kaya

    1. Heichel, G.H., and
    2. N.C. Turner

    . 1976. Phenology and leaf growth of defoliated hardwood trees, Chapter 3. In Anderson, J.F., and H.K. Kaya (Eds.) Perspectives in Forest Entomology. Academic Press, New York.
11. 11.↵
    1. Houston, D.R., and
    2. H.T. Valentine

    . 1977. Comparing and predicting forest stand susceptibility to gypsy moth. Can. J. For. Res. 7:447–461.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. McPherson, E.G,
    2. D.J. Nowak, and
    3. R.A. Rowntree

    1. Nowak, D.J.

    1994. Urban forest structure. The state of Chicago’s urban forest, pp. 3–18, 141-164. In McPherson, E.G, D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree (Eds.). Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186 of the USDA Forest Service, NE Forest Expt. Station.
13. 13.↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.

    1996. Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous urban trees. For. Sci. 42:504–507.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Schmid, J.A.

    1975. Urban Vegetation. Dept, of Geography, Univ, of Illinois. Chicago, IL.
15. 15.↵
    1. Shank, B.

    1987. A case study of the gypsy moth. Arbor Age 7:12–20, 42-46.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Ticehurst, M., and
    2. S. Finley

    . 1988. An urban integrated pest management program for gypsy moth: an example. J.Arboric. 14:172–175.

    OpenUrl