Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Tree Shelters Accelerate Slow-Growing Species in Nurseries

Robert K. Witmer, Henry D. Gerhold and Eric R. Ulrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1997, 23 (1) 40-48; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1997.005
Robert K. Witmer
Graduate Assistant, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Professor of Forest Genetics, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Manager - Forestry (retired), Met-Ed/Penelec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry D. Gerhold
Graduate Assistant, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Professor of Forest Genetics, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Manager - Forestry (retired), Met-Ed/Penelec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric R. Ulrich
Graduate Assistant, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Professor of Forest Genetics, School of Forest Resources, Penn State University
Manager - Forestry (retired), Met-Ed/Penelec
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    First year growth of Prunus subhirtella “Autumnalis” at Nittany Trees Nursery. Control tree is flanked by tree shelters 7 inches and 3 ° inches in diameter.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Magnolia stellata in the second year at Root’s Nursery, control tree and emerging from tree shelter.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Annual height growth (feet) and mean caliper (inches) presented by varieties, shelter treatments, and years for Experiment 1.

    VarietyHeight GrowthCaliper Growth
    No ShelterShelterNo ShelterShelter
    Year 1Year 2Year 1Year 2Year 2Year 2
    Acer griseum*0.50a0.31 a√0.65a1.20a0.67a0.40b
    Cercis canadensis-0.15b2.74a0.07a†2.33a1.02a0.73b
    Cornus ‘Celestial’*0.79b√2.12a2.33a2.40a0.87a0.67b
    Magnolia ‘Merrill’*0.32a0.78a√0.12b√2.17a0.68a0.66a
    Magnolia stellata*0.35a√0.72a√1.83b2.93a0.52a0.52a
    Malus ‘Adirondack’0.56b1.31a0.60b1.41a0.79a0.52b
    Syringa reticulata
    ‘Summer Snow’*
    0.10a0.27a√0.30a1.25a1.04a0.63b
    Combined*0.38b1.19a0.69b1.96a0.80a0.59b
    • For each variety, year 1 and year 2 means within treatments were compared.

      Varietal means with the same letter do not differ significantly from one another in height between years, or in caliper between treatments.

    • ↵* indicates a variety with a significant difference in two-year height growth between shelter treatments.

    • ↵√ indicates that the associated value is significantly lower than the value for the other shelter treatment in the same year and variety.

    • ↵† identifies a mean which is not significantly different from other means despite large apparent differences, because it is based on only three highly variable measurements.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean height growth (feet) and mean caliper growth (inches) presented by varieties and shelter treatments for Experiment 2 after one year.

    VarietyHeight GrowthCaliper Growth
    NoneSmallLargeNoneSmallLarge
    Acer capillipes0.37b2.37a2.27a0.10a0.14a0.17a
    Acer davidii0.48c1.79b2.38a0.12a0.04b0.10ab
    Carpinus caroliniana-0.16b1.58a1.43a0.19a0.18a0.16a
    Carpinus japonica0.43b1.85a1.74a0.04b0.14a0.16a
    Cornus ‘Celestial’0.36b1.66a1.37a0.14a0.13a0.14a
    Cornus ‘Constellation’0.44b1.91a1.39a0.18a0.12a0.12a
    Magnolia stellata0.19b1.36a0.67b0.02a0.04a0.04a
    Prunus ‘Kwanzan’1.68b3.96a4.04a0.24a0.10b0.14b
    Prunus subhirtella
    ‘Autumnalis’
    2.08b3.17a3.09a0.34a0.19b0.16b
    Combined0.65b2.18a2.04a0.15a0.12b0.13ab
    • For each variety and combined values, treatment means with the same letter do not differ significantly from one another.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Diameter means (inches) presented by varieties and shelter treatments for Experiment 1 after two years.

    VarietyNo ShelterShelter
    Acer griseum0.15 a0.17a
    Cercis canadensis0.23 b0.49 a
    Cornus ‘Celestial’0.21 b0.37 a
    Malus ‘Adirondack’0.19a0.28 a
    Magnolia ‘Merrill’0.13 b0.41 a
    Magnolia stellata--0.27
    Syringa reticulata
    ‘Summer Snow’
    --0.20
    Combined0.20b0.32 a
    • For each variety and combined values, treatment means with the same letter do not differ significantly from one another.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Diameter means (inches) presented by varieties and shelter treatments for Experiment 2 after one year.

    VarietyNo ShelterSmall ShelterLarge Shelter
    Acer capillipes0.120.240.22
    Acer davidii0.100.210.27
    Carpinus caroliniana--0.130.13
    Carpinus japonica--0.140.13
    Cornus ‘Celestial’0.100.120.10
    Cornus ‘Constellation’0.100.140.15
    Magnolia stellata--0.10--
    Prunus ‘Kwanzan’0.220.360.39
    Prunus subhirtella
    ‘Autumnalis’
    0.100.300.21
    Combined0.12b0.22a0.21a
    • Treatment means with the same letter do not differ significantly from one another. Duncan’s separations are not presented for each variety due to the nonsignificance of the interaction between variety and treatment.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Ratio of height (feet) to caliper (inches) presented by varieties, years and shelter treatments for Experiment 1.

    VarietyYear 1Year 2Year 3
    No
    Shelter
    No
    Shelter
    Shelter
    Acer griseum7.76.113.5
    Cercis canadensis6.76.112.2
    Cornus ‘Celestial’7.57.612.4
    Malus ‘Adirondack’6.47.312.0
    Magnolia ‘Merrill’7.96.510.9
    Magnolia stellata4.64.311.4
    Syringa reticulata
    ‘Summer Snow’
    4.43.77.9
    Combined6.46.011.6
    • Caliper was not measured in Year 1 within shelters.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Ratio of height (feet) to caliper (inches) presented by varieties and treatments for Experiment 2 after one year.

    VarietyNo ShelterSmall ShelterLarge Shelter
    Acer capillipes11.815.814.2
    Acer davidii6.39.59.8
    Carpinus japonica10.814.115.3
    Carpinus caroliniana11.213.512.8
    Cornus ‘Celestial’7.09.88.3
    Cornus ‘Constellation’6.710.59.7
    Magnolia stellata8.513.012.1
    Prunus ‘Kwanzan’7.615.113.4
    Prunus subhirtella
    ‘Autumnalis’
    9.615.816.4
    Combined8.813.012.4
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 23, Issue 1
January 1997
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tree Shelters Accelerate Slow-Growing Species in Nurseries
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Tree Shelters Accelerate Slow-Growing Species in Nurseries
Robert K. Witmer, Henry D. Gerhold, Eric R. Ulrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1997, 23 (1) 40-48; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tree Shelters Accelerate Slow-Growing Species in Nurseries
Robert K. Witmer, Henry D. Gerhold, Eric R. Ulrich
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1997, 23 (1) 40-48; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1997.005
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire