Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Using Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer as an Organic Mulch Fire Retardant

Gary W. Hickman and Ed Perry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 1996, 22 (6) 279-280; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1996.22.6.279
Gary W. Hickman
University of California, Cooperative Extension, Stockton, CA 95205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Ed Perry
University of California, Cooperative Extension, Stockton, CA 95205
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

The multiple benefits of organic mulches in landscape environments are well documented (3,7). The few problems associated with mulch use can be minimized or avoided with proper management. For example, development of nitrogen deficiency can be reduced by the addition of small amounts of nitrogen fertilizer to the mulch. Rates of 2 to 3 Ib nitrogen per 100 ft2 of mulch are recommended (2,4). Another problem, particularly in the United States West with its dry summer months, is the fire potential. Several California cities and highway departments report regular mulch fires, particularly near traffic areas, from discarded cigarettes (5). An inexpensive method of reducing organic mulch inflammability— the addition of fertilizer-grade ammonium sulfate, (NH4)2SO4—has been suggested in the literature (4). In the 1930s, this chemical was reported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory, as the least expensive flame retardant of 136 chemicals tested (6).

The purpose of this paper is to report the results of trials to test the fire retardant abilities of various ammonium sulfate applications to organic mulches used in the landscape.

Methods

Two commonly used organic mulches in commercial landscapes are shredded softwoods from timber operations and chipped mixed hardwoods from municipal pruning. Using aged samples of these 2 mulches, 1 ft2 (30.5 cm2) sample plots were established in Modesto, California, with a mulch depth of 3.2 inches (8.3 cm). Treatments included:

  1. 3 Ib (NH4)2SO4/10 gal water/1000 ft2 mulch (1.5 kg/40 L/100 m2)

  2. 3 Ib (NH4)2SO4/20 gal water/1000 ft2 mulch (1.5 kg/80 L/100 m2)

  3. 6 Ib (NH4)2SO4/10 gal water/1000 ft2 mulch (3.0 kg/40 L/100 m2)

  4. 6 Ib (NH4)2SO4/20 gal water/1000 ft2 mulch (3.0 kg/80 L/100 m2)

  5. Water only—10 gal/1000 ft2 mulch (40 L/100 m2)

  6. Water only—20 gal/1000 ft2 mulch (80 L/100 m2)

Each treatment was replicated 4 times and was allowed to dry for 2 hours after treatment. During this drying period from 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M., environmental conditions were as follows: air temperature at80.0-83.3°F (26.6–28.5°C); relative humidity of 43–49 % and wind speed of 7.4–8.0 mph (3.3–3.6 m/s) (1).

Following drying, each plot was ignited using a hand-held propane pencil-point burner for 5 seconds to the center of each plot. One hour after ignition, the burned area in each plot was measured.

Results

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Surface area (%) burned after 1 hour.

Conclusions

The most cost-effective treatment was 3 Ib ammonium sulfate in 20 gal water applied over 1000 ft2 of organic mulch (1.5 kg/80 L/100 m2) (treatment B). The lower solution rate (treatment A), as recommended in the literature, did not provide significantly better fire retardation than the control treatment (water alone). The higher rate of fertilizer (treatment C) or higher fertilizer and higher solution (treatment D) were not significantly different from the most cost-effective treatment. If treating mulched areas to prevent nitrogen deficiency, then using ammonium sulfate as the nitrogen source and dissolving the recommended rates in adequate water prior to application should also provide effective fire retardation in nonirrigated areas, based on this study. Further research is being made on the longevity of effects of this treatment and effects of rain and irrigation.

  • © 1996, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    California Irrigation Management Information System database, Station 71 (Modesto), Aug. 29, 1995, 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Feucht, J.R.
    1994. Mulches for home grounds. Colorado State Univ. leaflet #7.214.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Green, T.L., and
    2. G.W. Watson
    , 1989. Effects of turfgrass and mulch on the establishment and growth of bare-root sugar maples. J. Arboric. 15(11): 268–268.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Harris, R.W.
    , 1992. Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lagarbo, A.
    1995. City of Modesto. Pers. Comm.
  6. 6.↵
    1. R. Rowell
    1. LeVan, S.L.
    1984. Chemistry of fire retardancy. In: The Chemistry of Solid Wood. R. Rowell (ed.). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp. 531–574.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Shroch, W.A., et al
    . 1992. Mulches: Durability, aesthetic value, weed control, and temperature. J. Environ. Hort. 10(1): 43–43.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 22, Issue 6
November 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Using Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer as an Organic Mulch Fire Retardant
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Using Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer as an Organic Mulch Fire Retardant
Gary W. Hickman, Ed Perry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1996, 22 (6) 279-280; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1996.22.6.279

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Using Ammonium Sulfate Fertilizer as an Organic Mulch Fire Retardant
Gary W. Hickman, Ed Perry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1996, 22 (6) 279-280; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1996.22.6.279
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire