Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for use Under Pavement to Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes

Jason Grabosky and Nina Bassuk
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 1996, 22 (6) 255-263; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1996.039
Jason Grabosky
20 Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina Bassuk
20 Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Schematic diagram of the 6 inch diameter planting tube system used in the oak study.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Oak root penetration response to compacted clay loam over 5 compaction levels.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Oak root penetration data from the stonesoil mixes tested. No significant differences in root penetration were identified.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Evaluation of the relative compactness of the oak study stone-soil mix treatments. Peak density data taken from previously reported work (3,4).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    California bearing ratios of test samples as described by their stone fraction densities. Note that the lowest CBR values correspond with the stone fraction density of a 20% soil mix sample compacted to its peak standard AASHTO density. Data taken from previously reported work (3,4).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Acceptable CBR above 40 occurs when the soil is less than 25% of the mix. Rooting is acceptable when the soil is between 10% and 35%. The zone of overlapping acceptance then occurs when the soil is between 10% and 25% of the total mix by weight in this hypothetical example.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Description of the stone-soil media used in the oak study by stone to soil mixing weight ratio, compactive effort, and dry density. Each number represents a mean of 7 replicates. Mean stone matrix density and weight percentage of the soil fraction are for comparison to the materials shown in Figures 1 and 3.

    Stone to soil mixing ratioMean compactive effort (kJ/m3)% of standard AASHTO compactive effortMean replicate dry density by treatment (Mg/m3)Mean stone fraction density (Mg/m3)Weight % of soil fraction
    3.82:1591.99399.91.9281.52820.8
    4.06:1607.513102.52.0421.63819.8
    4.34:1592.702100.01.9441.58018.7
    4.66:1587.76899.21.9271.58617.7
    5.03:1622.799105.12.0661.72316.6
    5.47:1589.50699.51.9231.62615.5
    5.98:1568.80496.01.851.58514.3
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Description of the clay loam test treatments used in the oak study by compactive effort and resulting density. Results are from 10 observations per treatment. Standard AASHTO optimum moisture content of the clay loam was found to be 18%, and a peak density of 1.674 Mg/m3 was observed (ASTM D 698 method A used in testing).

    Treatment levelMean compactive effort (kJ/m3)Gravimetric moisture content at time of compactionMean resultant dry density (Mg/m3)% peak standard AASHTO density (1.674 Mg/m3)
    1024.9%1.24074
    259.59520.8%1.47988
    3125.83224.9%1.55493
    4243.83722.7%1.61697
    5605.28419.8%1.700102
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 22, Issue 6
November 1996
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for use Under Pavement to Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for use Under Pavement to Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes
Jason Grabosky, Nina Bassuk
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1996, 22 (6) 255-263; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1996.039

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for use Under Pavement to Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes
Jason Grabosky, Nina Bassuk
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1996, 22 (6) 255-263; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1996.039
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire