Article Figures & Data
Tables
Species % Diseased foliage2 June 21 July 5 July 27 C. alternifolia 3 ab 2 a 1 a C. amomum 0 a 3 a 1 a C. controversa 22 bcd 48 b 61 bc C. florida 30 d 37 b 40 b C. kousa 11 abc 11 a 2 a C. kousa var. chinensis 33 d 54 b 71 c C. mas 8 abc 7 a 2 a C. sericea 23 cd 40 b 48 bc ↵1 Anthracnose estimated using the Horsfall-Barratt disease assessment scale (6). The percentage of diseased foliage represents the visual estimate of the percentage of symptomatic leaves within the tree canopy.
↵2 Within each column, means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ according to Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (p = 0.05).
Species % Diseased foliage2 July 17 July 28 Sept 2 C. alba ‘Bloodgood’ 6 a3 6 a 48 b C. alba ‘Elegantissma’ 8 a 18 b 88 c C. alternifolia 3 a 7 a 8 a C. amomum 3 a 3 a 11 a C. augustata 5 a 5 a 5 a C. controversa 3 a 23 b 13 a C. florida ‘Cherokee Princess’ 38 b 72 c 76 c C. kousa 15 a 7 a 13 a C. kousa var chinensis 18 ab 60 c 88 c C. mas 2 a 4 a 5 a C. mas ‘Golden Glory’ 3 a 3 a 8 a C. stolonifera ‘Flaviramea’ 28 b 71 c 82 c C. stolonifera ‘Isanti’ 4 a 9 ab 46 b ‘ C. stolonifera ‘Kelseyi’ 38 b 61 c 58 bc C. stolonifera ‘Ruby’ 3 a 4 a 6 a ↵1 Differences in disease severity between locations were significant. As such, data were combined and means separation performed.
↵2 Anthracnose estimated using the Horsfall-Barratt disease assessment scale (6). The percentage of diseased foliage represents the visual estimate of the percentage of symptomatic leaves within the tree canopy.
↵3 Within each column, means followed by the same letter do not significantly differ according to Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test (p = 0.05).
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.