Potential of Tree Shade for Reducing Residential Energy Use in California

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Akbari, H.,
   2. A. H. Rosenfeld and
   3. H. Taha.

   1990. Summerheat islands, urban trees and white surfaces. ASHRAE Transactions 96:1: 1381–1388.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Akbari, H.,
   2. S. E. Bretz,
   3. J. W. Hanford,
   4. D. M. Kurn,
   5. B. L. Fishman
   6. H. G. Taha and
   7. W. Bos

   . 1993. Monitoring peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees and white surfaces in the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) service area. Report LBL-34411, Energy and Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
3. 3.↵
   California Energy Commission. 1990. Occupancy Patterns & Energy Consumption in New California Houses (1984 - 1988). California Energy Commission Report P400-90009. CEC Publications Office, MS-13, 1516 9th St, Sacramento, CA.
4. 4.↵
   California Energy Commission. 1991. California Energy Demand: 1991 - 2001: Volume I, Revised electricity demand forcasts. California Energy Commission, P300-91-023. CEC Publications Office, MS-13,1516 9th St, Sacramento, CA.
5. 5.↵
   1. Clark, K.;
   2. Berry, D.

   1995. House characteristics and the effectiveness of energy conservation measures. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61: 386–395.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. 6.↵
   Enercomp. 1992. Micropas v4.0 User’s Manual. Enercomp, Inc., 1851 Heritage Way, Suite 187, Sacramento, CA 95815
7. 7.↵
   1. Heisler, G. M.

   1986. Effects of individual trees on the solar radiation climate of small buildings. Urban Ecology 9:337–359.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Heisler, G. M.

   1990. Mean wind speed below building height in residential neighborhoods with different tree densities. ASHRAE Trans. 96 (Part1): 1389–1396.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Heisler, G. M.

   1991. Computer simulation for optimizing windbreak placementto save energy forheating and cooling buildings. InTrees and sustainable development: the third national windbreaks and agroforestry symposium proceedings. Ridgetown, OR: Ridgetown College: 100–104.
10. 10.↵
    1. Huang, J.,
    2. H. Akbari,
    3. H. Taha and
    4. A. Rosenfeld

    . 1987. The potential of vegetation in reducing summer cooling loads in residential buildings. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 26: 1103–1106.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Huang, J.,
    2. H. Akbari and
    3. H. Taha

    . 1990. The wind shielding and shading effects of trees on residential heating and cooling requirements. ASHRAE T rans. 96 (Part1): 1403 –1411.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Mallette, E. E.,
    2. K. A. Miller,
    3. J. Miwa and
    4. R. Eckstrom

    . 1983. California climate zone descriptions for new residential construction in climate zones 1 through 16. Publication P400-81-041, California Energy Commission, 1516 9th Street, Sacramento, California.
13. 13.↵
    1. McPherson, E. G.

    1984. Planting design for solar control, chapter 8. In Energy Conserving Site Design, Am. Soc. Landscape Archit., Washington, D.C. p.141–164.
14. 14.↵
    1. McPherson, E. G.

    1993. Evaluating the cost effectiveness of shade trees for demand-side management. Electricity Journal. 6(9): 57–65.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. McPherson, E. G.

    1994a. Energy-saving potential of trees in Chicago, chapter 7. In Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago urban forest climate project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 210 p.
16. 16.↵
    1. McPherson, E. G.

    1994b. Benefits and costs of tree planting and care in Chicago, chapter 8. In Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago urban forest climate project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 210 p.
17. 17.↵
    1. A. T. Wilson and
    2. W. Glennie

    1. McPherson, E. G.,
    2. R. Brown and
    3. R. A. Rowntree

    . 1985. Simulating tree shadow patterns for building energy analysis. In A. T. Wilson and W. Glennie (eds.) Solar 85 - Proceedings of the National Passive Solar Conference (pp. 378–382). Boulder, CO: American Solar Energy Society.
18. 18.↵
    1. McPherson, E. G. and
    2. P. L. Sacamano

    . 1992. Energy savings with trees in Southern California. Research report to Southern California Edison, Technical and Design Services. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 5801 N. Pulaski Rd., Chicago, IL 60646.
19. 19.↵
    1. Meier, A.K.

    1990/91. Strategic landscaping and air-conditioning savings: a literature review. Energy and Buildings 15-16: 479–486.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Myrup, L. O.,
    2. C. E. McGinn and
    3. R. G. Flocchini

    . 1993. An analysis of microclimatic variation within a suburban environment. Atmos. Environ. 27B: 129–156.

    OpenUrl
21. 21.↵
    1. Sand, M. A. and
    2. P. H. Huelman

    . 1993. Planting for energy conservation in Minnesota communities. Summary report for 1991-93 LCMR research project. St. Paul, MN: Department of Natural Resources, Forestry. 46 p.
22. 22.↵
    1. Simpson, J. R.,
    2. E. G. McPherson and
    3. R. A. Rowntree

    . 1994. Potential of tree shade for reducing building energy use in the PG&E service area. Final report to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, California. 187 p.
23. 23.↵
    1. Simpson, J. R. and
    2. E. G. McPherson

    . 1995. Impact evaluation of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District’s shade tree program. Final report, agreement no. 95-CL-004, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Monitoring and Evaluation, Sacramento, California. 44 p.
24. 24.
    SMUD. 1993. Residential Service Rate Schedule R, effective Jan. 1,1993. Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Sacramento, California.
25. 25.↵
    SMUD. 1994. Demand-side management resource plan, Vol. III: Measure Database. Resource Planning & Evaluation Department, Sacramento Municipal Utility District. Sacramento, California.
26. 26.↵
    1. Thayer, R. and
    2. B. Maeda

    . 1985. Measuring street tree impact on solar performance: a five-climate computer modeling study. J. Arboric. 11:1–12.

    OpenUrl