Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Social and Educational Benefits of a Community Shade Tree Program: a Replication

Robert Sommer, Joshua Summit, Fred Learey and Matthew Tirrell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1995, 21 (5) 260; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1995.042
Robert Sommer
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Summit
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Learey
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew Tirrell
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This is the third in a series of studies of the benefits and costs of resident involvement in planting trees. Earlier studies took place in Fresno and Sacramento, CA. The present study took place in Galt, CA, a city of 15,000 located 15 miles south of Sacramento in relatively new subdivisions where the Sacramento Tree Foundation (STF) had coordinated plantings several years earlier.

Procedures

Listen

The procedures were similar to those of the earlier studies (3, 4) using a mail survey to compare satisfaction levels in households whose trees had been planted as part of the STF program with those whose trees had been planted independent of the program. The return rate for the survey was 50.2% of delivered questionnaires and there was no indication of nonrespondent bias.

Results

Listen

Households whose trees had been planted by a developer were least satisfied with the outcome, specifically in such areas as the staking and support of the tree, location in the yard, perceived improvement to the yard, and had a lower overall opinion of the tree. Those with developer-planted trees also showed more desire to have the tree replaced. Half of the STF households and none of the non-STF households became better acquainted with their neighbors during the planting, and 87% of the STF households received maintenance information compared to only 12% of non-STF households.

These results provide further confirmation of the benefits of community planting in terms of user satisfaction, neighborhood interaction, and access to tree maintenance information and consultation, all of which have been linked to tree survival (1,2). Participation in the STF program appeared highly susceptible to cost considerations. If the goal of a community shade tree program is the widest possible access, some type of subsidy is probably necessary for low income households. The potential loss of involvement if trees are obtained without charge can be offset through investments of time and effort instead of money.

Acknowledgement

Listen

This research was supported by a cooperative agreement with the North Central Forest Experiment Station and a challenge grant from ISA. We would like to express our appreciation to the Sacramento Tree Foundation for their assistance.

  • © 1995, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

References

Listen
  1. 1.↵
    1. Sia, N.
    Street tree planting in Sacramento neighborhoods. Paper presented at the Third Annual Plant-People Conference (March 24-27, 1994), Davis, CA.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sklar, F. &
    2. Ames, R.G.
    1985. Staying alive: Street tree survival in the inner city. J. Urban Affairs: 7: 55–65.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sommer, R.
    2. Learey, F.,
    3. Summit, J. &
    4. M. Tirrell
    . 1994. The social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting. J. Arboric: 20: 170–175.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Sommer, R.
    2. Learey, F.,
    3. Summit, J. &
    4. M. Tirrell
    . 1994. The social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting: Comparision with developer-planted trees. J. Arboric. 20: 323–328
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 21, Issue 5
September 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Social and Educational Benefits of a Community Shade Tree Program: a Replication
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Social and Educational Benefits of a Community Shade Tree Program: a Replication
Robert Sommer, Joshua Summit, Fred Learey, Matthew Tirrell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1995, 21 (5) 260; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1995.042

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Social and Educational Benefits of a Community Shade Tree Program: a Replication
Robert Sommer, Joshua Summit, Fred Learey, Matthew Tirrell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1995, 21 (5) 260; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1995.042
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Procedures
    • Results
    • Acknowledgement
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire