Effect of Backfill Amendment on Growth of Red Maple

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Corley, W.L.

   1984. Soil amendments at planting. J. Environ. Hort. 2:27–30.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Hummel, R.L. and
   2. C.R. Johnson

   . 1985. Amended backfills: Their cost and effect on transplant growth and survival. J. Environ. Hort. 3:76–79.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. McDonald, A.J.S.,
   2. T. Lohammar, and
   3. A. Ericsson

   . 1986. Uptake of carbon and nitrogen at decreased nutrient availability in small birch (Betula pendula Roth.) plants. Tree Physiol.:61–71.
4. 4.↵
   1. Schulte, J.R. and
   2. C.E. Whitcomb

   . 1975. Effects of soil amendments and fertilizer levels on the establishment of silver maple. J. Arboric. 1:192–195.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Watson, G.W.,
   2. G. Kupkowski, and
   3. K.G. von der Heide-Spravka

   . 1992. Theeffectofbackfillsoiltextureandplanting hole shape on root regeneration of transplanted green ash. J. Arboric. 18:130–134.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Watson, G.W.,
   2. G. Kupkowski, and
   3. K.G. von der Heide-Spravka

   . 1993. Influence of backfill soil amendments on establishment of container-grown shrubs. HortTechnology 3:188–189.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.
   1. Whitcomb, C. E.

   1987. Establishment and Maintenance of Landscape Plants. Lacebark Publications, Stillwater, Okla.
8. 8.↵
   1. Wood, C.B.,
   2. T.J. Smalley,
   3. M. Rieger, and
   4. D. E. Radcliffe

   . 1994. Growth and drought tolerance of Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum ‘Mariesii’ in pine bark-amended soil. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:687–692.

   OpenUrl