Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Water Use of Landscape Plants Grown in an Arid Environment

D.A. Devitt, D.S. Neuman, D.C. Bowman and R.L. Morris
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1995, 21 (5) 239-246; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1995.039
D.A. Devitt
1. Mailing address is Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154
Department of Environmental and Resource Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
D.S. Neuman
2. Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154
Department of Environmental and Resource Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
D.C. Bowman
3. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
Department of Environmental and Resource Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R.L. Morris
4. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
Department of Environmental and Resource Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Evapotranspiration (L) of palm trees as a function of planting size, leaching fraction (LF) and time (mo). Potential evapotranspiration (ETo) converted to liters per month based on lysimeter surface area. Error bars indicate standard error (+/-) associated with average values based on three replications.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Average size characteristics of palm, pine and palo verde trees measured at the end of the 6 month experimental period.

    Plantingz sizeLFHeight (m)Trunk diameter (mm)Canopy volume (m3)Basal canopy area (m2)Fronds (#)
    Palm
      18.9 L-0.250.7697.10.690.908.7
      (#5)00.90117.51.020.9110.0
    +0.250.91122.50.800.778.0
        LSD0.050.1411.2NSNSNS
      56.8 L-0.251.04158.30.580.629.3
      (#15)00.93157.90.750.8110.7
    +0.251.08180.61.081.0512.0
        LSD0.05NSNSNSNS1.7
    Pine
      18.9 L-0.250.8626.90.070.22---
      (#5)00.7825.30.050.18—
    +0.250.7926.60.070.26—
        LSD0.05NSNSNS0.08
      56.8 L-0.252.0345.50.370.59
      (#15)01.8653.60.420.74—
    +0.252.0156.80.380.64—
        LSD0.05NS7.4NSNS
    Palo Verde
      18.9 L-0.251.3520.70.760.46—
      (#5)01.7124.81.150.65—
    +0.251.5920.51.060.70—
        LSD0.050.19NSNSNS
      56.8 L-0.252.0623.01.400.70
      (#15)01.5323.00.800.49—
    +0.251.8022.91.050.60—
        LSD0.050.28NSNSNS
    • ↵z 18.9 L = 5 gallon = #5 56.8 L = 15 gallon = #15

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Total (6 months) evapotranspiration (ETa) of palm, pine and palo verde trees separated by planting size and LF. Also, 6 month ETa totals for various shrubs, ground cover and grasses.

    Planting sizezLFETa (L)Palo verde
    PalmPine
    18.9 L-0.25288213228
      (#5)0.00514173290
    +0.25470233303
      LSD0.059342NS
    56.8 L-0.25465285372
      (#15)0.00552346357
    +0.25769389314
      LSD0.0516996NS
    Shrubs
    Oleander346
    Texas Ranger297
    Waxleaf Privet252
      LSD0.0579
    Ground cover
    Myoporum258
    Rosemary258
    Gazania208
      LSD0.0538
    Grass
    Bermudagrass/Ryegrass195
    Bermudagrass195
    Buffalograss166
    Bentgrass153
      LSD0.0523
    • ↵z 18 L = 5 gallon = #5 57 L = 15 gallon =#15

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Average size characteristics of oleander, Texas ranger and waxleaf privet.

    Height (m)TrunkZ diameter (mm)Volume (m3)Basal canopy area (m2)
    Oleander0.9844.40.630.51
    Texas ranger0.6417.90.210.25
    Waxleaf privet0.7628.40.280.31
        LSD0.050.2611.90.180.14
    • ↵Z Trunk diameter measured at 5 cm above soil surface as opposed to 15 cm above soil surface for trees.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Regression equations and correlation coefficients (r) for the relationship between monthly evapotranspiration (ETa,L) and monthly potential evapotranspiration (ETo,cm).

    ETa (L)r*
    PalmETa = -5.97 + 7.68(ETo)Z0.90
    Palo VerdeETa = -33.32 + 5.90(ETo)Z0.99
    PineETa = 15.88 + 3.02(ETo)Z0.91
    MyoporumETa = -11.46+ 3.61 ETo)0.99
    RosemaryETa= 2.65 + 2.68(ETo)0.97
    GazaniaETa = 2.01 + 2.20(ETo)0.99
    OleanderETa = -14.12 + 4.75(ETo)0.96
    Texas RangerETa = -20.12 + 4.20(ETo)0.99
    PrivetETa= 4.19+ 2.51 (ETo)0.99
    Bermuda/RyeETa = - 7.55 + 2.19(ETo)0.99
    BermudaETa = -15.43 +3.16(ETo)0.95
    BuffaloETa =-16.73+ 3.25(ETo)0.98
    BentgrassETa = -15.45 + 2.82(ETo)0.97
    • ↵Z includes data only for the 0.00 and +0.25 LF treatments of the 57 L planting size.

    • ↵* p = 0.001

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Total (6 months) actual evapotranspiration per basal canopy area (trees, shrubs) or lysimeter area (ground cover, grasses). Numbers in parenthesis represent a ratio of tree, shrub or groundcover evapotranspiration to high fertility bermudagrass evapotranspiration.

    PlantingZ size (L)LFEvapotranspiration (L/m2)Z
    PalmPinePalo verde
    -0.25324 (0.39)989(1.17)555 (0.66)
    18.90.00604 (0.71)948 (1.12)502 (0.59)
    (#5)+0.25607 (0.72)678 (0.80)488 (0.58)
    -0.25756 (0.89)539 (0.64)833 (0.98)
    56.80.00736 (0.87)469 (0.55)735 (0.87)
    (#15)+0.25819 (0.97)743 (0.88)521 (0.62)
        LSD0.05253318NS
    Shrubs
    Oleander692 (0.82)
    Texas Ranger974(1.15)
    Waxleaf Privet829 (0.98)
        LSD0.05NS
    Ground cover
    Myoporum1123 (1.33)
    Rosemary1123(1.33)
    Gazania903 (1.07)
        LSD0.05164
    Grass
    Bermudagrass/Ryegrass846 (1.00)
    Bermudagrass846 (1.00)
    Buffalograss666 (0.79)
    Bentgrass734 (0.87)
        LSD0.05113
    • ↵Z 18 L = 5 gallon = #5 57 L = 15 gallon = #15

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 21, Issue 5
September 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water Use of Landscape Plants Grown in an Arid Environment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Water Use of Landscape Plants Grown in an Arid Environment
D.A. Devitt, D.S. Neuman, D.C. Bowman, R.L. Morris
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1995, 21 (5) 239-246; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1995.039

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Water Use of Landscape Plants Grown in an Arid Environment
D.A. Devitt, D.S. Neuman, D.C. Bowman, R.L. Morris
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1995, 21 (5) 239-246; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1995.039
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Evapotranspiration
  • leaching fractions
  • growth characteristics
  • irrigation
  • landscape
  • tree
  • shrub
  • groundcover
  • grass

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire