Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Nesting of Breeding Birds on an Electric Utility Line Right-of-Way

W.C. Bramble, R.H. Yahner and W.R. Byrnes
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1994, 20 (2) 124-129; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1994.023
W.C. Bramble
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University, 1159 Forestry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1159 and School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R.H. Yahner
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University, 1159 Forestry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1159 and School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
W.R. Byrnes
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University, 1159 Forestry Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1159 and School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listen

A nesting study of breeding birds on an electric transmission line right-of-way (ROW) was made in central Pennsylvania in 1991 and 1992. Active nests of 13 bird species were found on the ROW, and 5 of the most common species nested on both handcut and herbicide-treated ROW segments. The average nesting success for all bird species in both years combined was 68%. A nesting success of 70% was obtained on a mowed plus herbicide (cut stubble) ROW unit, 68% on a selective basal spray unit, and 67% on a handcut unit. Shrubs were the most commonly used nesting cover. However, grass and forb cover was also used for nesting by field sparrows and common yellowthroats, in particular, both of which had a 100% nesting success on the ROW.

A nesting study of breeding birds was made on an electric utility line right-of-way (ROW) in the Allegheny Mountain Region of central Pennsylvania in 1991 and 1992. This was done to help explain large increases in the ROW bird population observed from June to August (2). We were particularly interested in learning whether or not these increases were due to nesting and subsequent rearing of young on the ROW, or simply to an influx from other areas in August.

Specific objectives of the study were 1) to determine if bird species commonly observed on the ROW also use the ROW for nesting, 2) to compare nesting success on handcut versus herbicide-sprayed ROW treatment units, 3) to evaluate relative use of ROW shrub and herbaceous plant species as nesting cover, and to compare nest location on wire and border zones.

The importance of shrubs for successful nesting of birds on electric transmission line ROW has been emphasized by several investigators. A 50% nesting success for 14 nests located in grass cover was reported from a study on an electric transmission line ROW in Maryland that was mowed annually (4). In the same study, a 75% nesting success for 12 nests was found in shrub cover that had been developed by selective basal sprays at 2-3 year intervals.

A study on an electric transmission line ROW in New York state found that the 6 most common bird species nested in shrubs or low trees (5). As a result, selective basal sprays were recommended to preserve shrubs for nesting cover.

For comparison with nesting success of birds on ROW, it is important to note that in a study of avian ecology in aspen stands in central Pennsylvania from 1985-1987, a 51 % nesting success was fou nd for 95 nests (6). Nests that were located near the ground and concealed by dense low vegetation were found to be less susceptible to avian predation than nests located at more than 0.5 ft. above ground.

Methods

Listen

Three ROW treatment units that had been given maintenance treatments in 1987 using the wire zone-border zone method were selected for study (Figure 1). These units were 500 to 700 feet long and 180 feet wide.

The treatments selected were:

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Diagram of a 230 kV line and right-of-way showing designated wire and border zones. A low plant cover is present on the wire zone with a tall shrub cover on the border zone. Target trees have been controlled on both zones.

Handcutting.

Trees and tall shrubs were clearcut on the wire zone which produced a tree sprout cover type. Trees only were selectively cut on the border zones which produced a tree sproutshrub cover type.

Selective Basal Spray.

Trees and tall shrubs were selectively sprayed on the wire zone with a mixture of Access (1.5%) in water (98.5%); while tree only were selectively sprayed on border zones. This produced a shrub cover type on both wire and border zones.

Mowing Plus Herbicide Spray.

The entire wire zone was mowed and a broadcast spray of Tordon (0.75%) and Garlon (0.75%) in water (98.5%) applied to the cut stubble. The border zones were given a selective basal spray of Weedone CB undiluted. A grass-forb cover type was produced on the wire zone and a shrub cover type on the border zones.

Systematic bird nest searches were begun on the 3 units in early June of 1991 and 1992 and continued at 2- to 4-day intervals until the middle of July to determine nesting success. A nest was considered successful if one or more young were fledged. When a nest was found, it was monitored until it was either destroyed, depredation occurred on the eggs or young, or the young were fledged. Presence of young or family groups near abandoned nests also was recorded.

Results

Listen

A total of 42 nests of 13 bird species was found on the 3 ROW units (Table 1). In general, all ROW treatment units provided favorable habitats for nesting bird species that have been commonly found on the ROW (2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Number of eggs produced, number of young fledged, and nesting success of breeding-bird species on the ROW for 1991 and 1992, combined.

Nesting success.

Nesting success on the 3 ROW units averaged 66% for the years 1991 and 1992 combined (Table 1). This compared favorably with the 50% and 75% nesting success observed on ROW in Maryland (5), and with the 51% in aspen stands in central Pennsylvania (6).

Of the bird species found nesting on the ROW, 8 used the basal spray unit, 8 the handcut unit, and 5 used the mowing plus herbicide unit (Table 2). All 6 of the most common species nested successfully on the basal spray unit. Five of the common 6 species nested successfully on the handcut unit and 3 of 6 on the mowing plus herbicide unit.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Summary of bird nesting on each of three ROW treatment units in 1991 and 1992.

In addition to the species listed in Table 1, a downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) was observed taking food into a cavity in a red oak (Quercus rubra) snag located on the ROW-forest edge. This was noted as a successful nesting at that time and correlated well with observations of frequent use of the ROW and the adjoining forest edge in 1982 and 1983 (1).

The percent of successful nests among the treatment units for all species combined ranged from 67% on the handcut unit to 70% on the mowing plus herbicide unit (Table 2). The important “number of young fledged,” which has been used for nesting success, was very similar among the treatment units and ranged from 1.6 to 2.1.

Location of nests on ROW treatment units.

The largest number of nests (6.4 per acre) was found on the selective basal spray unit, and the lowest on the handcut unit (3.9 per acre) (Table 2). This difference was probably due to greater abundance of desirable shrubs on the basal spray unit. The mowing plus herbicide unit (5.6 nests per acre) had shrub cover only on the border zones.

The total number of bird species nesting per acre, 2.5 to 2.9, was similar for the 3 treatment units studied. This was probably due to the presence of shrubs on all units. Thus, the lack of shrubs on the wire zone of the mowing plus herbicide unit was compensated for by the presence of tall shrubs on the border zones.

Use of plant cover types for nesting.

Of the total nests found on the ROW, 31 were in a shrub cover type, 9 were in the grass-forb cover type, and 2 were in the tree sprout cover type (Table 3). Nests of 2 common species, gray catbirds and indigo buntings, were found only in shrub or tree sprout cover types. These nests were usually located 1.7 to 4.0 feet above ground. The other common species were found nesting in both shrub and grass-forb cover types.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Use of plant species for bird nesting.

Several species usually regarded as forest birds (3), such as red-eyed vireo, veery, and rosebreasted grosbeak, were found nesting on the ROW borders in witchhazel. In addition, the thicket-inhabiting cedar waxwing and yellow-billed cuckoo also used witchhazel for nesting.

In this connection, it should be noted that 2 plant cover types were present on the mowing plus herbicide unit, which consisted of a tall shrub cover on border zones plus a grass-forb cover on the wire zone. This meant the tall shrubs were available for such species as catbird and indigo bunting and grass-forb cover for field sparrow, towhee, song sparrow, and yellowthroat.

Use of wire and border zones for nesting.

More nests and more species nested on the border zones than on the wire zones of the basal spray and mowing plus herbicide spray units (Table 4). This appeared to be due to the abundance of tall shrub cover (witchhazel, mt. laurel, and blackberry) on the border zones. These shrubs are the sole nesting cover used by gray catbird, black-billed cuckoo, chestnut-sided warbler, and indigo bunting.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Location of bird nests on ROW wire and border zones of treatment units.

In contrast, equal numbers of nests were present on the wire and border zones of the handcut unit. This was probably due to the presence of tall and medium height shrubs on both zones and the occurrence of small openings with grass-forb cover also in both zones.

Plant species used for nesting.

Shrub species were most favored for nesting cover on the ROW (Table 3). Of these, blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) was by far the most commonly used species (11 nests). It was followed by witchhazel (Hamamelis virginiana) (8 nests), Mt. laurel (Kalmia latifolia) (7 nests), and blueberry (Vacciniumspp.) (5 nests). Two nests were found on oak sprouts (Quercus spp.) and 2 on bear oak (Quercus ilicifolia).

Although forbs and grasses were used to a lesser extent, they were important to certain species such as the field sparrow, the most common species on the ROW, and towhee. The forbs used for nesting were hayscented fern (Dennstaedtia punctilobula) and goldenrod (Solidagospp.). These species not only form large patches on the ROW wire zone, but are also common in openings in shrub cover. The common grasses used for nesting were poverty grass (Danthonia spicata) and tall fescue (Festuca elatior.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Chestnut-sided warbler nest with 4 eggs located in blackberry on the ROW border zone on 6/11/91.

Discussion

Listen

This study has indicated that the common species of birds found on the ROW do nest successfully on the ROW plant cover provided by the 3 maintenance methods used, namely, selective basal spraying, mowing plus herbicide spraying, and handcutting Use of the wire zone-border zone method was important to retention of valable shrub cover on the ROW.

Although shrubs were the most frequently used plant cover for nesting, the common grasses and forbs were also important for several common bird species typically found on the ROW, such as the field sparrow. This emphasized the value of a diverse plant cover that included both shrub and grass-forb cover types.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Common yellowthroat nest with 4 eggs located in blueberry on the ROW wire zone on 6/4/91.

Nesting success for all species combined was relatively high (68%) when compared to success in aspen stands in central Pennsylvania (51%), and similar to success on the electric transmission line ROW in Maryland (50 to 75%). Nesting success for common species averaged 75% in our study.

Acknowledgments.

Listen

Cooperators were Asplundh Tree Expert Company, DowElanco, Metropolitan Edison Company (GPU), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (GPU), Pennsylvania Electric Company (GPU), and the Pennsylvania GameCommission.

  • © 1994, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

Listen
  1. 1.↵
    1. Bramble, W.C.,
    2. W.R. Byrnes, and
    3. M.D. Schuler
    . 1984. The bird population of a transmission right-of-way maintained by herbicides. J. Arboric. 10(1):13–20.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bramble, W.C.,
    2. R.H. Yahner, and
    3. W.R. Byrnes
    . 1992. Breeding-bird population changes following right-of-way maintenance treatments. J. Arboric. 18(1):23–32.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bull, J. and
    2. J. Farrand
    . 1977. Audubon Field Guide to North American Birds. (Eastern Region). Knopf, N.Y. 715 p.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chasko, G.G. and
    2. J.E. Gates
    . 1981. Avian breeding success in relation to grassland and shrubland habitats within a 130 kV transmission line corridor. Proceedings 2nd Symp. on Environ. Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management, Ann Arbor, MI, p. 68–1 to 68-12.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Malefyt, J. de Waal
    . 1987. Effects of herbicide spraying on breeding songbird habitat along electric transmission rights-of-way. Proceedings 4th Symp. on Environ. Concerns in Rights-of-Way Manage. Indianapolis, IN, p. 28–33.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Yahner, R.H.
    1991. Avian nesting ecology in small evenaged aspen stands. J. Wildlife Manage. 55:155–159.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 20, Issue 2
March 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nesting of Breeding Birds on an Electric Utility Line Right-of-Way
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Nesting of Breeding Birds on an Electric Utility Line Right-of-Way
W.C. Bramble, R.H. Yahner, W.R. Byrnes
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1994, 20 (2) 124-129; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nesting of Breeding Birds on an Electric Utility Line Right-of-Way
W.C. Bramble, R.H. Yahner, W.R. Byrnes
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1994, 20 (2) 124-129; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.023
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments.
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire