Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Field-Grow Fabric Containers do not Affect Transplant Survival or Establishment of Green Ash

Janet C. Cole and David L. Hensley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1994, 20 (2) 120-123; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1994.022
Janet C. Cole
Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 and Associate Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
David L. Hensley
Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 and Associate Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Root system from a balled and burlapped tree (A) and a tree grown in FGFC (B) showing circling of the root system in the FGFC. Both root systems were approximately 76 cm in diameter.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Initial height (cm), height increase (cm), initial caliper and caliper increase of green ash during 1991 and 1992 in Oklahoma and Kansas.

    BagGelPeatFertilizerOklahomaKansasOklahomaKansas
    199119911992
    Initial height (cm)Height increase (cm)
    NoNoNoNo213az220a19.6a7.8a13.2a
    YesNoNoNo187ab190ab12.3a8.8a13.7a
    YesNoNoYes155b155b21.6a11.3a22.1a
    YesNoYesNo182ab184ab19.8a8.6a22.0a
    YesNoYesYes180ab181ab19.5a9.9a26.0a
    YesYesNoNo174b175b21.8a8.9a22.0a
    YesYesNoYes165b177b18.7a8.7a24.7a
    YesYesYesNo155b167b16.7a8.8a23.0a
    Initial caliper (mm)Caliper increase(mm)
    NoNoNoNo37.2az35.1a6.9a16.6a3.8a
    YesNoNoNo26.9b29.7ab4.6a16.1a7.4a
    YesNoNoYes26.4b24.0a4.6a16.2a9.1a
    YesNoYesNo25.3b28.8ab5.2a13.1a4.4a
    YesNoYesYes25.5b3O.4ab4.5a18.7a6.2a
    YesYesNoNo24.8b28.5ab3.2a17.6a5.1a
    YesYesNoYes25.3b25.7b7.1a17.6a8.0a
    YesYesYesNo27.1b26.5b4.3a17.3a4.6a
    • ↵z Mean separation between columns by Tukey’s w Procedure. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Canopy width, leaf stem and root dry weight and number of small (< 1 cm) and large (> 1 cm) roots on green ash two years after transplanting from field grow fabric containers or balled and burlapped in Oklahoma.

    BagGelPeatFert.Canopy width (m)Dry weight (g)No. of roots
    LeafStemRootSmallLarge
    NoNoNoNo1.77az1017.5a3524.7a1945.2a77a47a
    YesNoNoNo1.49a815.1a2579.8a1660.8a61a46a
    YesNoNoYes1.90a928.6a2491,9a1748.3a58a54a
    YesNoYesNo1.72a843.4a2898.0a1660.8a53a39a
    YesNoYesYes2.05a973.9a3240.5a2026.2a61a51a
    YesYesNoNo1.94a962.4a2784.0a1899.9a67a51a
    YesYesNoYes1.60a928.8a2811.7a1705.1a62a49a
    YesYesYesNo1.64a816.2a3385.8a1951.2a53a53a
    • ↵z Mean separation within columns by Turey’s w Procedure. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P = 0.05).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 20, Issue 2
March 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Field-Grow Fabric Containers do not Affect Transplant Survival or Establishment of Green Ash
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Field-Grow Fabric Containers do not Affect Transplant Survival or Establishment of Green Ash
Janet C. Cole, David L. Hensley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1994, 20 (2) 120-123; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Field-Grow Fabric Containers do not Affect Transplant Survival or Establishment of Green Ash
Janet C. Cole, David L. Hensley
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1994, 20 (2) 120-123; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.022
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Urban Trees and Cooling: A Review of the Recent Literature (2018 to 2024)
  • Aerial Imagery as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Tree Retention: Applications, Strengths and Challenges for Backyard Tree Planting Programs
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire