Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Growth, Biomass, and Trim/Chip Time Reduction Following Application of Flurprimidol Tree Growth Regulator

Kent D. Redding, Patrick L. Burch and Kenneth C. Miller
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1994, 20 (1) 38-45; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1994.008
Kent D. Redding
DowElanco, 9002 Purdue Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Roles: Research Biologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick L. Burch
DowElanco, 4900 Falls of Neuse, STE. 150, Raleigh, NC 27609
Roles: Research Biologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Miller
ACRT, Inc. Environmental Specialists, 227 N. DePeyster St., Kent, OH 44240-0219
Roles: Tree Pathologist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photos show application of basal soil drench (left) and tree implant (right).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Chipping and weighing of biomass removed in trimming.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Typical response of alternative tree growth regulator technology two seasons after treatment. Tree on left was basal soil drenched; tree on the right was untreated check.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Cross-section of red oak shows the compartmentalization that occurs during wound closure. Photo is two seasons after treatment. Note the lack of tree damage and how well trees recover.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Regrowth, green biomass, and trim and chip time as compared to the untreated check.1

    Species and location
    TreatmentDose 2Silver maple (Ohio)Willow oak (Virginia)Water oak (Virginia)Norway maple (Pennsylvania)
    Regrowth and % of regrowth 3,6
    Drench0.586a3212a3220b5427b36
    0.7585a3110a2712b3216b21
    1.072a274a114a1132b43
    Implant0.566a2410a2737c1006a8
    0.7577a2830b8127b7326b35
    Control 271b10037b100377c10075c100
    Green biomass and % of green biomass 4, 6
    Drench0.5336a3833b29237b3225a21
    0.75402a4528b25484b6525a21
    1.0194a2227b24244b3323a19
    Implant0.5213a248a778a1025a21
    0.75274a3117b1555a725a21
    Control 887b100112c100750c100119b100
    Trim and chip time and % of trim and chip time 5, 6
    Drench0.567a4815b75100b6411a39
    0.7567a4813a65111b7110a36
    1.036a268a4083b539a32
    Implant0.556a405a255Oab3210a36
    0.7558a4110a5028a1814a50
    Control 140b10020b100157c10028b100
    • ↵1 Trees measured in August 1992, three growing seasons after treatment.

    • ↵2 Grams active per inch dbh.

    • ↵3 Regrowth in inches of the total of seven longest shoots measured and averaged.

    • ↵4 Pounds of biomass of each tree added together and averaged.

    • ↵5 Actual time to trim tree and chip brush in minutes (does not include dumping).

    • ↵6 Percent as compared to untreated control.

    • 7 Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 10% level using Tukey’s pairwise comparisons.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 20, Issue 1
January 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Growth, Biomass, and Trim/Chip Time Reduction Following Application of Flurprimidol Tree Growth Regulator
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Growth, Biomass, and Trim/Chip Time Reduction Following Application of Flurprimidol Tree Growth Regulator
Kent D. Redding, Patrick L. Burch, Kenneth C. Miller
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1994, 20 (1) 38-45; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Growth, Biomass, and Trim/Chip Time Reduction Following Application of Flurprimidol Tree Growth Regulator
Kent D. Redding, Patrick L. Burch, Kenneth C. Miller
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1994, 20 (1) 38-45; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1994.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
  • Energy Potential of Urban Tree Pruning Waste
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire