Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Recent Work with Soluble Benlate in Canada

Geoffrey Munro
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1976, 2 (4) 74-76; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1976.016
Geoffrey Munro
Davey Tree Expert Company, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listen

This article describes the latest method of injecting a form of soluble benlate into elm trees to control Dutch elm disease. This work has originated and is for public use only in Canada at this writing. Lignisan-P, the name of this chemical, is injected into trees directly through the roots or alternately into the root-flares. A discussion of the selection of trees for injection is included.

The purpose of this article is to inform the interested members of ISA of the current use of soluble benomyl as a control for Dutch elm disease (DED). It is important to note that this work is being done in Canada and therefore falls under the Canadian and provincial chemical control authorities. A comparable chemical is being released in the USA at this writing but this article deals strictly with the Canadian work.

The chemical, Lignisan-P, is injected into elm trees in two ways (Kondo et al. 1974b). Both root injection and lower trunk or flare injection have shown promising results for arresting and preventing DED in mature elm trees (Kondo et al., 1972).

The Chemical

Listen

Lignisan-P, the commercial name for one form of soluble benomyl, can be injected in large quantities into both diseased and healthy elms. Being in a water-soluble form, the fungicide can reach all parts of the tree. The characteristic symptoms of DED are brought about by the presence of a toxin in the tree. This substance is released by the causal fungus, Ceratocystis ulmi. The soluble benomyl is injected at a fungistatic concentration. It does not kill the fungus but stops it from multiplying. The injected tree may then live with the fungus still in it. Both prevention and therapy of DED are possible by injection. In the case of therapy, the visual DED symptoms are later removed.

Tree Selection

Listen

An important question to be considered is how extensively infected a tree can be and still be successfully injected. Some disease-free trees are injected as a prevention against DED (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A mature healthy elm injected in 1975 to prevent Dutch elm disease.

When infected a tree must be assessed as to the possibilities of successful treatment. Each tree is given a disease index, based on the visual symptoms and the percentage of the crown that is affected (Kondo et al. 1974a).

When this index is between 0 and 50, the tree is considered treatable. Beyond this range it is considered seriously diseased, and any portion that might be saved would no longer be esthetically pleasing. Also, the chances of success are very slim (Kondo et al. 1973). In addition to the disease index, the general health of the tree should be considered. A healthy, vigorously growing tree will absorb Lignisan more readily and is more likely to ward off DED. For this reason a feeding program is recommended along with the injection.

Another factor to be considered is tree location and injectability. It is difficult to excavate a curbside or road-side tree and this sometimes makes root injection impossible. A tree in a soil with a high water table may also not lend itself to root injection. Then flare injection must be used. This method has not proved as successful as root injection (C.F.S., 1975).

Injection Methods

Listen

The primary method of injection involves the excavation of soil to expose one root from each main root flare around the base of the tree. The roots are followed from the tree, always taking the largest root at each junction. The excavation must be done with considerable care as a cut or scarred root will permit loss of the chemical and will not send the dosage up the tree. The normal tool used for this is hand trowels when in close proximity to the root (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The soil must be excavated to expose roots with considerable care.

When the root has been followed out from the tree to the appropriate size, 1 -1 ½ inch in diameter, it is cut and a conical-shaped root-nipple placed over it (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

The roots are cut and a conical root-nipple put over the end.

The flare injection involves drilling 5/16 inch diameter holes into the tree as low to the ground as possible, every 6 inches around the tree. These holes penetrate only to the cambium where the uptake of chemical is accomplished. A 3/8 inch hollow wooden dowel is then inserted and a 3/8 inch I.D. plastic tube is placed over the dowel and clamped (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Hoses are placed over hollow 3/8 inch dowels in the root flares of a tree.

In both methods, once the actual sites of injection are prepared, they are connected to a reservoir of chemical that is under 10 psi pressure from a nitrogen bottle (Fig. 5). The Lignisan in the reservoir is prepared at from 250 parts per million (ppm) up to 1000 ppm in concentration. The lower the concentration, the larger the volume required as a dosage. Similarly the larger the diameter of the tree, the larger the dosage required. The larger the volume injected the better distribution that is attained throughout the crown.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

All injection points are connected to a reservoir of Lignisan-P and the system is pressurized with 10 psi of nitrogen.

Practical experience has shown that starting with 500 ppm and increasing the concentration if and when required provides an adequate tradeoff between chemical distribution and injection time. The maximum time for any injection of this type is 48 hours, so the only time when the concentration of the dosage must be increased is when the required volume of chemical will not be taken up in this time period. Using 500 ppm, however, usually an injection can be completed in one day (i.e. 12-24 hours). With this time allotment, a tree that is started one day can be stopped the next, so the injectors need never lie idle. A concentration higher than 1000 ppm is not used for fear of phytotoxic effects brought on by the chemical.

Summary

Listen

Lignisan-P can be injected into healthy, or partially diseased trees, in an effort to control DED. Injection is possible through two methods which can be used in conjunction on a single tree. Injection has shown itself to be of value for two growing seasons.

The wood laid down the third year does not contain enough Lignisan to affect control. A tree in a condition or a location that suggests possible reinfection with DED, should be injected after two seasons.

The use of this chemical for injection has been released to the commercial arborists in the province of Ontario under the control of the Ontario Shade Tree Council (OSTC). They are responsible for training and licensing those interested in injecting commercially. OSTC offers a one-week course of instruction each year, usually in June or July, in Ottawa. This course is open to all interested people from Canada or the USA. The course is carried out in conjunction with the Canadian Forestry Service and the National Capital Commission and insures the student of a complete grounding in this new procedure.

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵1 Presented at the International Shade Tree Conference in Detroit, Michigan in August 1975.

  • © 1976, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

Listen
  1. ↵
    1. Canadian Forestry Service Great Lakes Forest Research Centre and Ontario Shade Tree Council and National Capital Commission
    . 1975. Dutch elm disease systemic fungicide injection course.
  2. ↵
    1. Kondo, E.S.
    1972. A method for introducing water-soluble chemicals into mature elms. Canadian Forestry Service. 0-X-171.
  3. ↵
    1. Kondo, E.S., and
    2. G.D. Huntley
    . 1973. Root-injection field trials of MBC-phosphate in 1972 for Dutch elm disease control. Canadian Forestry Service. 0-X-182.
  4. ↵
    1. Kondo, E.S. and
    2. G.D. Huntley
    . 1974a. An index for rating trees with Dutch elm disease. Canadian Forestry Service. 0-X-201.
  5. ↵
    1. Kondo, E.S. and
    2. G.D. Huntley
    . 1974b. A large-capacity injection system for chemical solutions in Dutch elm disease control. Canadian Forestry Service. 0-X-192.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 2, Issue 4
April 1976
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recent Work with Soluble Benlate in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Recent Work with Soluble Benlate in Canada
Geoffrey Munro
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1976, 2 (4) 74-76; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1976.016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recent Work with Soluble Benlate in Canada
Geoffrey Munro
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1976, 2 (4) 74-76; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1976.016
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Chemical
    • Tree Selection
    • Injection Methods
    • Summary
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire