Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Manganese Deficiency — Contributory to Maple Decline?

J. James Kielbaso and Kenneth Ottman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) February 1976, 2 (2) 27-32; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1976.007
J. James Kielbaso
Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Ottman
Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

    Sugar maple chlorosis in Michigan. Symptoms before and after manganese treatments. Crown symptoms (upper left). Leaf chlorosis and recovery (upper right). Crown recovery (lower left). Nino Mauro and Jim Kielbaso examine a maple treated 45 days earlier with a manganese trunk implant (lower right).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Average nutrient levels of healthy and chlorotic maples. (Rogers City, Ml(September 2, 1971

    Chlorotic (6)Healthy (3)
    %
    N1.761.90
    K.79.70
    P.24.24
    Ca1.881.92
    Mg.22.18
    ppm
    Na13078
    Mn1430
    Fe3237
    Cu46
    B5538
    Zn1213
    Al5957
    • View popup
    Table II.

    Selected soil test results for five locations within Rogers City, Ml, 1971

    ppm
    SamplepHZnMnFe
    17.719.21660
    27.730.02252
    38.05.61428
    47.65.61328
    57.66.81044
    Mean7.7213.415.045.6
    • View popup
    Table III.

    Color response of five sugar maple trees 50 days after treatment with various Sequestrene* chelated micronutrients. (Rogers City, Ml) 1972

    TreatmentRate tsp/galJune Av ColorAugust Av ColorAverage Improvement
    Mn½5.68.63.0
    Zn1½4.64.60.0
    Cu¾3.83.80.0
    GA5-1114 oz.5.07.42.4
    Fe3301½4.04.6.6
    Control—3.83.80.0
    Mn(liquid)1½4.87.22.4
    Mg½4.64.2-0.4
    Mn1½5.28.02.8
    Zn35.05.20.2
    Fe138½5.05.40.4
    • ↵* Sequestrene is a registered Ciba-Geigy Corporation trade mark. Rates tested as suggested by manufacturer.

    • View popup
    Table IV.

    Comparison of mean nutrient content of sugar maple leaves by response to micro-nutrient treatment. (Rogers City, Ml) August 3,1972.

    No Response (Chlorotic)Response (Green)
    %
    P.39.31
    Cu1.992.34
    Mg.24.23
    ppm
    Na151.1170.5
    Mn2.117.9
    Fe35.228.3
    Cu9.87.7
    B57.771.2
    Zn20.716.8
    Al54.249.2
    • View popup
    Table V.

    Color response to spray1 and soil application of micronutrients (1973) sequestrene*-chelated

    Treatment and LocationRate tsp/galNumber of TreesAverage Improvement
    Rogers City
    Mn¼12.0
    Mn½62.66
    Mn342.0
    soil Mn¼ hole40.0
    GA5-1112 oz.43.0
    Alpena
    Mn½33.0
    Mn322.25
    soil Mn¼ hole22.25
    Fe 3301½20.0
    • ↵1 Each tree was treated on one side and a comparison made with the unsprayed portion of the tree.

    • ↵* Sequestrene is a registered Ciba-Geigy Corporation trade mark.

    • View popup
    Table VI.

    Greening effect of various manganese treatments1 to chlorotic maples in June, 1974 as recorded June, 1975

    Location and Treatment1Number of TreesAverageOne-Year Improvement
    Leaf Color Ratings
    6/746/75
    Flint
      MnSO4 28%44.8757.1252.25
      Mn chelate45.1255.25.125
      Check46.05.125-.875
      Complete26.257.0.75
    Saginaw
      MnSO4 28%64.756.661.91
      Mn chelate55.25.4.20
      Check45.54.5-1.00
      Complete34.834.830.00
    Alpena
      MnSO4 28%74.076.642.57
      Mn chelate74.075.211.14
      Check54.204.70.50
      Complete34.836.331.50
    Rogers City
      MnSO4 28%74.05.2141.214
      Mn chelate54.66.101.50
      Check44.8755.625.75
      Complete24.756.01.25
    Lansing
      MnSO428%44.257.02.75
      Mn chelate44.754.875.125
      Check34.8334.8330.00
      Complete24.55.51.00
    Average
      MnSO4 28%284.3996.4102.071
      Mn chelate254.6805.380.700
      Check205.0504.950.10
      Complete125.005.875875
    • ↵1 Treatments were: Mn-SO4-28% soluble encapsulated (Medicaps, Creative Sales, Fremont, Nebraska); Mn chelate and complete were liquid injections.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 2, Issue 2
February 1976
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Manganese Deficiency — Contributory to Maple Decline?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Manganese Deficiency — Contributory to Maple Decline?
J. James Kielbaso, Kenneth Ottman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Feb 1976, 2 (2) 27-32; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1976.007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Manganese Deficiency — Contributory to Maple Decline?
J. James Kielbaso, Kenneth Ottman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Feb 1976, 2 (2) 27-32; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1976.007
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Description of Symptoms
    • Manganese Determination
    • Practical Methods
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
  • The Efficacy of Various Preventive Soil-Applied Potassium Phosphite Products Against Foliar Phytophthora Infections on Rhododendron over Time
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire