Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Computer Use In City Tree Inventories

David E. Cramer, Frederick J. Deneke and Gene W. Grey
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) October 1976, 2 (10) 193-196; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1976.2.10.193
David E. Cramer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederick J. Deneke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gene W. Grey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Computerized city tree inventory systems can be a valuable tool in program planning and management. We developed and tested a system for the community of Waterville, Kansas. We think the system can have widespread application.

Progressive leaders in all fields have welcomed developments that facilitate decision making and afford accuracy in projecting programs. Computer systems as a management tool are gaining widespread acceptance with facilities now readily available at relatively low cost. A computer inventory system lends itself well to city tree management by providing helpful data in developing planting plans, planning for dead-tree removal, implementing systematic maintenance scheduled, and controlling insect and disease situations.

This concept is not new as computerized tree inventory systems have been used in several large cities for several years (D’Ambrosio, 1974; Johanssen, 1975). However, few smaller towns have developed programs, and none to the authors’ knowledge, in villages of fewer than 5000 population.

To test the practicality of a computerized inventory in a small town, a program was developed for Waterville, Kansas (population 761). The inventory was developed and conducted by foresters from the departments of State and Extension Forestry, Horticulture and Forestry, a statistician, and students enrolled in the course “Municipal Forestry” at Kansas State University. Waterville was chosen because it had (1) an active City Tree Board, (2) a comprehensive city tree ordinance, (3) a modest city tree budget, (4) a need for data to improve management decisions, and (5) proximity to Kansas State University.

Waterville’s present city tree program was developed as part of the Kansas Community Forestry Program, administered by the Department of State and Extension Forestry at Kansas State University.

In a city tree inventory, it is desirable to obtain the following information: 1) total number of trees, 2) tree location, 3) species composition, 4) size, 5) condition, 6) management needs, and 7) planting needs. A system for collecting such data was developed for Waterville. Sample inventory forms and coding instructions are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Census form

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Inventory instructions for Waterville survey.

Data were analyzed using a computer program structured for social sciences (SP SSH-version 5.01) (Nie, et al., 1970). The program uses cross-tabulation of variables, which can be requested in any sequence or combination. The combination of variables is limited only by data input and user ingenuity. In the Waterville case, the Tree Board requested this information:

  1. Condition class by species.

  2. Management needs by species and location.

  3. Planting needs by size and location.

  4. Removal needs by location and difficulty class.

  5. Species percentages of total tree population.

Based on this information, members of the Tree Board will revise and update their street tree management program. For example, planting requirements must be evaluated in regard to location or concentration, species selection, and number of trees to be planted. The inventory revealed that 411 new trees were needed to achieve full stocking (Table 1). As shown in Table 2, the computer output can provide that information citywide, on a given street, and on any given block by tree size category. From that information, proper selection of compatible species can be made, purchase requirements determined, and planting schedules formulated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Planting needs by street.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Planting needs by location for small trees.

Tree removals follow the same format. Location and concentrations are known as well as removal difficulty class (Table 3). Thus projections of equipment and man-hours, along with systematic schedules, can be formulated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Cross-tabulation of removal needs by location and difficulty class (difficulty).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Cross-tabulation of heavy pruning needs by location.

The area of individual tree management or maintenance can be addressed fully. From the computer output, management needs (pruning, wound repair, insect and disease control, etc.) can be determined citywide (Table 4). Systematic maintenance schedules can then be developed and priority areas designated for effectively assigning work crews and equipment.

As can be seen by our examples, location information requested was broken down by block. If desired, one can also require printout combinations for individual block sides or for individual trees.

The major cost in computerizing tree inventory data is for man-hours required to survey individual trees. Of course, that depends on the detail desired. The 100 percent field survey of Waterville was conducted by three groups of three individuals, each group surveying approximately 1500 trees. Forty-five man-hours were required to collect the data. With practice, three men using optical mark sense cards probably could accomplish the task in 5 hours (15 man-hours). The processing cost is minimal, however, it depends upon the amount of printout requested. The cost of the Waterville program from the Kansas State University Computing Center was approximately $20 for more than 200 pages of output. Modification of survey techniques may lower cost and streamline the system.

In larger cities with greater area and volume of trees, sub-sample techniques may be considered to reduce the expense. Usually, tract development areas are quite homogenous with respect to tree species. Therefore, instead of a 100 percent inventory, a 10 percent or 20 per cent subsample of the tree population might be all that is needed to provide adequate information for various projects. Although the specifics for individual trees are lost, all aspects of an overview are retained.

The computer program also could be modified to estimate shade tree values. Incorporating factors of the International Shade Tree Conference formula into the program would produce values for the total tree population and for each species or for individual trees. Such values can be used to stress the importance of a city’s tree resources and to support budget requests. Investigating available computer systems will provide several possibilities for statistical analyses, model design, and concentration mapping.

Formulating an annual budget is a demanding task that requires factual information. How many trees need pruning, fertilizing, insect and disease control, or removal? What are the total planting requirements? The inventory data can answer those questions. Based on the computer output, purchases of supplies and materials can be accurately forecast, manpower requirements determined, and assessments made regarding contract and in-service work.

A computerized tree inventory system only provides data. Effective use of the data is the key to budget maximization. Savings in annual operating costs alone may offset cost of the inventory and computer time used. Those responsible for city forestry programs benefit from efficient operation; the trees benefit from proper care, and the residents have a better tree environment.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Student, Department of Horticulture and Forestry; Asst. Prof., Horticulture and Forestry; Kansas State University, Assoc. Prof., State and Extension Forestry, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.

    Program development and assistance by Dr. George Milliken, Asst. Prof., Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, is gratefully acknowledged.

    Contribution No. 564, Department of Horticulture and Forestry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.

  • © 1976, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. D’Ambrosio, Gregory
    . 1974. Carmel’s Computerized Trees. Arborist’s News 39(9): 150-152.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Johannsen, Hans J
    . 1975. Municipal Tree Survey and Urban Tree Inventory. Journal of Arboriculture 1(4): 110.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Nie, N.H.,
    2. Bent, D.H. and
    3. Hull, C.H
    . 1970. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 5.01 New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 2, Issue 10
October 1976
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Computer Use In City Tree Inventories
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Computer Use In City Tree Inventories
David E. Cramer, Frederick J. Deneke, Gene W. Grey
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Oct 1976, 2 (10) 193-196; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1976.2.10.193

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Computer Use In City Tree Inventories
David E. Cramer, Frederick J. Deneke, Gene W. Grey
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Oct 1976, 2 (10) 193-196; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1976.2.10.193
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire