Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1976, 2 (1) 16; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1976.2.1.016
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Smith, Elton M. 1975. Mice are choosy—like euonymus best! Nursery Notes, 8(4): 5-6. Cooperative Extension Service, Ohio State University, Columbus.

Producers of container-grown nursery stock have long known that unless they take precautions to control field mice, considerable plant losses can be expected during the over-wintering season. Since low structures are used, what plants can be stored in these units with the knowledge that mice are not as likely to feed on them? To evaluate the susceptibility of a number of woody ornamentals to damage from mice was one of the objectives of a 1974-75 over-wintering study at OSU. The results indicate that mouse damage occurred in all houses and was most severe on Euonymus sarcoxie and vegetus, Japanese holly, Spring Glory forsythia, Royal Beauty cotoneaster, and slender Deutzia.

  • © 1976, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 2, Issue 1
January 1976
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1976, 2 (1) 16; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1976.2.1.016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1976, 2 (1) 16; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1976.2.1.016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire