Comparison of Four Methods of Street Tree Assessment

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Barker, P.A.

   1983. Some urban trees of California: Maintenance problems and genetic improvement possibilities. In Gerhold, Henry D. Proceedings of the fourth biennial conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement alliance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University School of Forest Resources; 1983: 47–54.
2. 2.↵
   1. F.S. Santamour

   1. Brush, R.O., and
   2. T.A. Moore

   . 1976. Some psychological and social aspects of trees in the city. In: F.S. Santamour, et al., Eds. Better Trees for Metropolitan Landscapes. Technical report NE. 22, Forest Service USDA, 25–28.
3. 3.↵
   1. Byrne, G.

   1988. Let a hundred million trees bloom. Science 242(4877), p. 371.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Getz, D.A.,
   2. A. Karow, and
   3. J.J. Kielbaso

   . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. J. Arboric. 8: 258–263.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   1. Gold, S.M.

   1977. Social benefits of trees in urban environments. International J. of Environmental Studies, 10: 85–90.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Jim, C.Y.

   1990. Evaluation of tree species for amenity planting in Hong Kong. J. Arboric. 14: 27–44.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Altman, I., and
   2. J.F. Wohlwill

   1. Kaplan, R.

   1983. The role of nature in the urban context. In: Altman, I., and J.F. Wohlwill, Eds. Behavior and the Natural Environment. New York Plenum.
8. 8.↵
   1. Payne, B.R., and
   2. S. Strom

   . 1975. The contribution of trees to the appraised value of unimproved residential lots. Valuation, 22, 36–45.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Schroeder, J.W., and
   2. W.M. Cannon

   . 1983. The aesthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio towns. J. Arboric. 9: 237–243.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Sommer, R.,
    2. C.L. Cecchettini, and
    3. H. Guenther

    . 1992. Agreement among arborists, gardeners, and landscape architects in rating street trees. J. Arboric. 18: 252–256.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Sommer, R., and
    2. B.A. Sommer

    . 1989. The factor structure of street tree attributes. J. Arboric. 15:243–246.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Sommer, R.,
    2. H. Guenther, and
    3. P.A. Barker

    . 1990. Surveying householder response to street trees. Landscape Journal, 9: 79–85.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Sommer, R.,
    2. J. Summit, and
    3. A. Clements

    (in press). Slide ratings of street tree attributes. Landscape Journal.
14. 14.↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.

    1984. Ohio’s shade tree evaluation project; in search of a well adapted tree. J. Arboric. 8:115–122.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Tararchek, G.M.

    1987. Indicators of urban forest condition in New Orleans. J. Arboric. 13: 217–224.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Wagar, J.A., and
    2. P.A. barker

    . 1983. Tree root damage to sidewalks and curbs. J. Arboric. 9:177–181.

    OpenUrl