Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Work Measurement System

Edward L. Cunningham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1992, 18 (1) 43-44; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1992.18.1.43
Edward L. Cunningham
Forestry-Manager, Jersey Central Power & Light Co., 300 Madison Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey 07962
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The three operating companies under General Public Utilities (GPU) -- Metropolitan Edison (Meted), Reading, PA; Pennsylvania Electric (Pennelec), Johnstown, PA; Jersey Central Power & Light (JCP&L), Morristown, NJ -- jointly developed and use a record-keeping program known as the GPU Forestry Report. The program was developed approximately fourteen years ago. The type of information gathered and the method reported is standard throughout the GPU system. With uniform, standard information, valid comparisons can be made within each operating company and between them system wide.

Key is a uniform time sheet which is standard throughout all operating companies for all contractors. All coded information used on the time sheet is shared, i.e. contractor I.D. codes, accounting information, equipment description, etc.

The type of information gathered on the time sheet includes week ending date, location code (Division), crew foreman name and code, equipment used and hours, crew members working and labor hours and work completed (trees trimmed, trees removed, acres cut/sprayed, and mile accomplished). This information is coded as firm price or time and material and is also captured as maintenance or capital. Hours lost to inclement weather are captured as is miscellaneous work hours spent on non-circuit type work (landscape related, special projects, etc.). The time sheets are checked weekly by the Division foresters, and formal audits are conducted by the general office staff throughout the year to check accuracy and compliancy with clearance guidelines as well as adherence to established policies and procedures. The time sheets are completed on a weekly basis.

The information on the time sheet is summarized by the various contractors into a contractor summary report. From this document, input is made to the main frame computer via one of several methods: direct on screen input by the utility; direct input from contractor supplied tape/disc; keypunching of input by vendor who then supplies tape/disc. Input can be made directly from the time sheet, but at the present time, most time sheet information is transcribed to an input document by the contractor for data entry by one of the means previously mentioned. The method used varies from company to company.

The reports generated vary, and the selection has been increased over the years as specific needs arose. Reports are broken down into the primary work functions: distribution and transmission, maintenance and capital work, landscape maintenance, substation weed control. The reports vary from highly detailed to summary type. They are available for circuit historical analysis and contractor performance. The reports are on a division basis with company summaries. Report time frame covers a calendar month as the shortest period available. They can also be requested by any combination of months desired.

Productivity measures include cost per mile (the main productivity measure), cost per tree trimmed, cost per tree removed, cost per acre (mowed/sprayed), and manhours per mile, trees trimmed, trees removed and acres maintained.

Certain historical reports are only generated annually to develop year-end reports. Others are used on a monthly basis to track progress and monitor crew productivity.

Due to the age of our programs, there are several deficiencies. The program is written in an outdated format and language. Changes in the program are very costly and slow to be completed, and there are certain changes which cannot be accomplished. The program was developed as a record keeping tool and to monitor production when the majority of our work was completed on an hourly basis. Today most of our work is done via firm price which does not fit the program very well. The major drawback is that of monitoring expenses against budget. The program was never designed to be a budget tracking tool; therefore, its use in accurately monitoring expenses on a monthly basis in a timely fashion is lacking. Another problem for JCP&L is in the input of data. The present method is to have contractors forward input documents, verify them, and then have an outside vendor input data to disc.

This process is time-consuming and expensive, causes time delays in providing reports (information on report of no value to field when they finally get it); and due to passing data through so many hands, accuracy suffers greatly.

To overcome these shortfalls, PC programs have been developed and purchased to fill in the gaps of the main frame program until a new system can be implemented.

Footnotes

  • ↵1. U.A.A. Panel Discussion presented at the 67th Annual Conference in Philadelphia, PA. August 14, 1991.

  • © 1992, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 18, Issue 1
January 1992
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Work Measurement System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Work Measurement System
Edward L. Cunningham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1992, 18 (1) 43-44; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1992.18.1.43

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Work Measurement System
Edward L. Cunningham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1992, 18 (1) 43-44; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1992.18.1.43
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire