Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Urban Arboriculture Waste Reduction and Recycling

K. A. Beattie
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1991, 17 (5) 135-137; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1991.17.5.135
K. A. Beattie
Parks & Recreation Department, P.O. Box 1790, Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 3C8
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The introduction of any new or unique programs within a municipal government in financial restraint requires excellent planning. Understanding the concepts of change and the development of a strong opportunity analysis are critical to the success of the new program. This article reveals the pre-planning process, change management, a generic strategic planning process and a theoretic implementation program for a civic Christmas tree recycling project.

Managing change is critical to the success of any project, lest the change manage you. Our assumptions, beliefs and reflex reactions about change impact directly on our ability to lead, perceive and facilitate a change effectively. A myopic perspective of the work place, the programs, and the process of change is not entirely negative, it may, however, limit your future advancements. Knowing and more importantly, understanding that change is a constant factor at work and at home is vital to the well being of yourself and the approach you utilize at work. Developing effective change management skills and attitude are essential to dealing with today’s complex work environment.

If you believe that any new program, the change, is based on accurate information and is for the benefit of the corporation, it will be easier to lead your staff through the process of change and convince the appropriate levels of its value.

Organizational change is slow. The “system” takes considerable time to react or accomplish a task. The frustration of slow process has been the demise of many a good project and an equal number of managers. Trying to speed up or push a change through is a guarantee for failure, or at minimum for increased time to implementation. Deal with all levels in the appropriate order. Lobbying is beneficial, if approached properly and sincerely. Jumping adminstrative heads and neglecting involvement at any level can be a disastrous combination.

Communication skills are an obvious advantage in the process of change. I feel that superior communication skills are necessary to accomplish the established goal. Understand what strengths you have in this area, and utilize them to the maximum. It is critical that the information you are trying to relay is accurate and reasonable. If you have difficulty with the concept in principle, your target will as well.

Attempt to develop a strategic plan for the next new project you work on. Try utilizing the following categories tb streamline the process. I have met with success time and time again when I have applied the following actions:

  • Statement of Opportunity. A key section to build the excitement, enthusiasm and interest in the proposed program. Highlights the main aspects that make this proposal a winner.

  • Approach/Theme. The name of the project, something ţhat wraps up the entire package and makes it mentally portable.

  • Scope/Scale/Size. Express the extent of the program in both abstract and concrete terms.

  • Goals/Objectives/Aims. Consideration should be given to the ease of completion, the budget implications, goodwill and image of the politician and the administration.

  • Limitations/Constraints. This portion usually generates ą list of why nots.

  • Precedents/References. The recording of other projects in other cities that bear resemblance to the project you are proposing, or public commitments that support the proposal.

  • Issues. These emerge through discussion internally. Anticipate what the issues might be, and prepare your responses.

  • Factors Critical to Success. Develop a list of milestones that must be accomplished.

  • Stakeholder Analysis. Identify the key groups/ people, their current position on the proposal and their desired position on it. Identify the ‘critical mass’ of people needed for the endorsement of the project.

  • Cost/Benefit Summary. To some, the most important category. Includes the budget and the financial information.

Christmas Tree Recycling Project

The city of Regina’s urban forestry section has implemented a program of recycling. The planning process implemented was as described, and the results were very well received. The Christmas Tree Recycling Project received national media coverage on New Year’s Day. Locally the program was very well accepted both politically and by the public.

The concept of city-wide Christmas tree recycling was born in 1988. We asked citizens to take their trees to a designated site, not too far from the center of the city. It just did not work out. It was too much work for the most of us. How could we make it simple for everyone, yet keep the lid on expenses. Why not use the system that already exists?

Routing for the waste disposal program in Regina is remarkably structured. They are around every week for a regular pick up. Maybe they could make a special pick up for the Christmas trees. That seemed very simple. Each person in the city would just have to haul out their tree to the curb on the appropriate pick up day. The trucks would be there, as scheduled, and off it goes. In Regina, we found that it was necessary to provide a second or duplicate pick up over the period of one week. This was the preferable mode for the engineers, as there was no disruption of service, the established routes translated into expediency of service. The costs were also reduced due to pre-established logistics.

The city of Reginahas 175,000 people, (60,000+ households), most of whom are strong willed and from backgrounds that may not appreciate this newfound science of recycling, but they accepted the program. Total number of Christmas trees collected and mulched 18,426.

Costs

Ten thousand dollars may seem to be a lot of money for the program, but this amount was placed in the garbage collection budget. Once factored into the entire project, it worked out to be relatively reasonable. The garbage detail agreed that this would be a worthy and profitable cause for them.

To recover the money, each and every Christmas tree that is sold within our municipality is tagged. The tag is a simple, recycled piece of paper that states in brief format, what the recycling project is all about. On the reverse side, it indicates by map where the designated drop off site is and the collection day schedule for pick up. This way the customer has the choice of either delivering the tree to the site, or waiting for the appropriate pick up day.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Assuming that a 1 cubic yard of mulch weighs 250 pounds, and the current price is $7.50 per cubic yard, the cost to purchase the 250 tons of collected material would have been $15,000. In the years to come, we expect to lower the cost of the service as well as increase the number of trees that are mulched.

Future Plans

The obvious progression from this program is to next provide a private tree and shrub pruning collection project targeted to landscape waste. The plans for Regina in the next few months is to establish pruning classes that would instruct on why and how to prune. With cooperation from the various departments, specified collections for landscape waste could be established much like the Christmas tree project. Yard waste could be municipally mulched and then sold back to the public. The estimate that we have made for the 1991 budget includes such a project. The projected revenue is in excess of $20,000 if the product is sold for 25 cents a pound.

Hopefully, the change to landscape waste recycling will be accomplished in the same manner as the change to Christmas tree recycling.

Footnotes

  • ↵1. Presented at the annual conference of the International Society of Arboriculture in Toronto in August 1990.

  • © 1991, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 17, Issue 5
May 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urban Arboriculture Waste Reduction and Recycling
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Urban Arboriculture Waste Reduction and Recycling
K. A. Beattie
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1991, 17 (5) 135-137; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1991.17.5.135

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Urban Arboriculture Waste Reduction and Recycling
K. A. Beattie
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1991, 17 (5) 135-137; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1991.17.5.135
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Christmas Tree Recycling Project
    • Costs
    • Future Plans
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire