Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
AbstractsAbstracts

Abstracts

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1991, 17 (4) 93; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1991.17.4.93
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

BELLOWS, T.S., T.D. PAINE, K.Y. ARAKAWA, C. MEISENBACHER, P. LEDDY and J. KABASHIMA. 1990. Biological control sought for ash whitefly. California Agriculture 44(1 ):4-6.

The ash whitefly, introduced into California in 1986 or 1987, attacks ash as well as fruit and other ornamental trees. Populations have reached extraordinary levels in Los Angeles County. In this report, we briefly describe the origins and scope of the infestation, the pest potential of the species, and current research toward solutions. Pesticide treatment is an option primarily against populations of nursery stock destined for shipment to noninfested areas. Several pesticides have been tested with varying results. None provided completely clean stock. The primary management approach being developed is the importation and colonizing of natural enemies of ash whitefly. Natural enemies include parasitoids, predators and diseases. Future studies will determine the relative effectiveness of different release tactics, such as numbers released, timing of releases, and need for subsequent releases.

HIGGINBOTHAM, J.S. 1990. Decline. Am. Nurseryman 172(81); 31-34, 36, 38-40.

The harbingers of tree decline are often as subtle as an unnatural thinning of the crown. During the past decade, one species after another has fallen on hard times. Sugar maple, ash, flowering dogwood, oak and several conifers are among the trees in trouble in the eastern half of the US. At times, a single aggressive disease or pest—like chestnut blight or hemlock wooly adelgid—is responsible. However, true “declines” involve tangled relationships between stress and secondary agents. Fortunately, many types of declines that appear insurmountable in the wild prove easier to manage in the nursery or landscape. Control measures that are inappropriate for forest application can often protect valuable crops and specimens. The following overview covers serious instances of genus- and species-specific tree declines now occurring in the US and Canada—and ventures a few predictions regarding decline trends for the years to come.

  • © 1991, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 17, Issue 4
April 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abstracts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Abstracts
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1991, 17 (4) 93; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1991.17.4.93

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Abstracts
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1991, 17 (4) 93; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1991.17.4.93
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Abstracts
  • Abstracts
Show more Abstracts

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire