Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Collecting Data on Contractor Performance

Alan D. Klonowski
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1991, 17 (4) 105; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1991.029
Alan D. Klonowski
System Forester, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, 55 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio 44101
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Distribution line clearance is a major component of most utilities’ operating budget. Utility Foresters are constantly confronted with the need to justify budget requests, schedule work effectively, account for work completed, verify expenses, and improve worker productivity. Thus it is essential that the Utility Forester has line clearance production and cost data readily available. Computerized record keeping of cost and production data is the most effective method of obtaining a continuous stream of information for your management decisions.

Selection of a system

Before you make any decisions on a new system, you and your staff must analyze the existing system of record keeping from producer to user. The best source of how things currently work is the people actually doing the work. They can tell you what is right or wrong. Decide what your information needs really are. Do you need all the bells and whistles? Can you afford them? Find your information users and address their needs.

Take a look at current and future needs. Develop a flow chart (Your systems people will help you with this.) to track how you want your new system to work from start to finish. Prepare detailed descriptions of your requirements such as:

  • Time sheets

  • Reports: on line or printout?

  • Who puts in data?

  • Who should receive data?

  • Development and training needs

  • Interaction with other information systems in your company (VERY IMPORTANT).

Developing a new information system or updating a present system is a major task that may take three to four years to design and implement. In-house development is one approach if a firm commitment of time and support can be agreed upon. You will always have someone in-house to service and enhance your system.

Obtaining a system at use in another utility or acquiring an existing system from a contractor or consultant can offer a tested and operating system in a relatively short time (several months). Cost and compatibility with your computer, accounting systems and procedures, and your informations systems people are essential considerations.

There is always the possibility that all you need are a few adjustments to your old system, or even that your present system is just fine.

The Illuminating Company system

In 1982, we decided that our present computerized cost and production record keeping system was inadequate for the following reasons:

  • Our contractors were recording their information on two reporting forms, one for us and one for their people.

  • All our data were being keypunched into the system at one central location.

  • Invoice verification

    • — Invoice payment and accounts were settled all at different locations.

  • There were no provisions for on-line data viewing. Reports were available only as printouts and only on a monthly basis.

  • Data correction was virtually impossible.

We determined that we absolutely needed the following:

  • One-time reporting form that could be used by each of our contractors and our data processing people

  • Capability of entering and verifying our data at each contractor reporting location (regional service centers) with an on-line system

  • Printed reports generated on request for designated recipients

  • On-line viewing of data for designated people

  • The ability to access data for off-line analysis (i.e., personal computers) as our needs changed

  • A system that would allow for future growth and modification

  • A system that worked in conjunction with other record keeping systems in the company

We chose to use our in-house information systems people because of their willingness to provide their services and the desire of the company to use our own resources as much as possible. In the fall of 1985, our new system was tested, on-line, and functioning properly.

Conclusion

I believe our efforts were successful because we achieved all of our goals at an acceptable cost in a realistic amount of time. The most important results have been that our line clearance staff now has accurate data on cost and production when and where they need it. Since much has happened in the information industry in the past five years, we are again looking at our system to further increase the effectiveness and ease of use of our system.

Footnotes

  • ↵1. Presented at the annual conference of the International Society of Arboriculture in Toronto, Ontario in August 1990.

  • © 1991, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 17, Issue 4
April 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Collecting Data on Contractor Performance
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Collecting Data on Contractor Performance
Alan D. Klonowski
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1991, 17 (4) 105; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Collecting Data on Contractor Performance
Alan D. Klonowski
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1991, 17 (4) 105; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.029
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Selection of a system
    • The Illuminating Company system
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Perceived Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Private-Sector Urban and Community Forestry in the Southern United States
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire