Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Production Method Affects Growth and Root Regeneration of Leyland Cypress, Laurel Oak and Slash Pine

J. Roger Harris and Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1991, 17 (3) 64-69; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1991.017
J. Roger Harris
Department of Environmental Horticulture, IFAS, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward F. Gilman
Department of Environmental Horticulture, IFAS, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    Anonymous. 1986. American Standard for Nursery Stock. American Assoc. Nurserymen, Wash. D.C.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Blessing, S.C. and
    2. M.N. Dana
    . 1987. Post-transplant root expansion in Juniperus chinensis L. as influenced by production system, mechanical root disruption, and soil type. J. Environ. Hort. 5(4):165–158.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Burdett, A.N.,
    2. D.G. Simpson, and
    3. C.F. Thompson
    . 1983. Root development and plantation establishment success. Plant and Soil 71:103–110.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Coutts, M.P.
    1983. Development of the structural root system of Sitka spruce. Forestry 56:1–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dumbroff, E.B. and
    2. D.P. Webb
    . 1978. Physiological characteristics of sugar maple and implications for successful planting. For. Chron. 54(2):92–95.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Fuller, D.F. and
    2. W.A. Meadows
    . 1987. Root and top growth response of five woody ornamental species to fabric field-grow™ containers, bed height, and trickle irrigation. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 32: 148–153.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fuller, D.F. and
    2. W.A. Meadows
    . 1988. Influences of production systems on root regeneration following transplanting of five woody ornamental species. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 32:148–153.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.
    1988. Tree root spread in relation to branch dripline and harvestable root ball. HortScience 23: 351–353.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.
    1989. Plant form in relation to root spread. J. Environ. Hort. 7:88:90.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gilman, E.F. and
    2. M.E. Kane
    . 1990. Growth and transplantability of Magnolia grandiflora following root pruning at several growth stages. HortScience 25:74–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Harris, J.R.
    1990. Effect of production method on pretransplant growth and post-transplant establishment of four species of ornamental trees. M.S. thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ingram, D.L.,
    2. U. Yadav, and
    3. C.A. Neal
    . 1987. Production comparisons for selected woody plants in Florida. Hort-Science 22(6): 1285–1287.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ingram, D.L.,
    2. C.A. Martin, and
    3. B. Castro
    . 1988. Container spacing strategies modify temperature and holly growth. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 33:71–74.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kozlowski, T.T. and
    2. W.J. Davies
    . 1975. Control of water balance in transplanted trees. J. Arboric. 1(1):1–10.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lumis, G.P. and
    2. S.J. Johnson
    . 1980. Transplanting method influences survival and growth of bare-root coniferous nursery stock. J. Arboric. 6(10):261–268.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Reiger, R. and
    2. C.E. Whitcomb
    . 1983. A root control system for growing trees in the field. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 28:100–102.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Richie, G.A. and
    2. J.R. Dunlap
    . 1980. Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. N.Z. J. For. Res. 10:218–248.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Stone, E.C.
    1955. Poor survival and physiological condition of planting stock. For. Sci. 1(2):90–94.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Stone, E.C. and
    2. G.H. Schubert
    . 1959. Root regeneration by Ponderosa pine seedlings at different times of the year. For. Sci. 5:322–332.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Tilt, K.,
    2. W.T. Witte and
    3. H. Dickerson
    . 1988. Effects of irrigation on growth of four ornamental trees produced in ‘grow bags’ and by traditional field production methods. Proc. Southern Nurseryman Assoc. Res. Conf. 33:114–119.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Vanstone, D.E., and
    2. W.G. Ronald
    . 1981. Comparison of bareroot verses tree spade transplanting of boulevard trees. J. Arboric. 7(10):271–274.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Watson, G.W.
    1985. Tree size affects root regeneration and top growth after transplanting. J. Arboric. 11 (2):37–40.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Watson, G.W. and
    2. E.B. Himelick
    . 1982. Seasonal variation in root regeneration of transplanted trees. J. Arboric. 8(12):305–310.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Whitcomb, C.E.
    1985. Innovations and the nursery industry. J. Environ. Hort. 3:33–38.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 17, Issue 3
March 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Production Method Affects Growth and Root Regeneration of Leyland Cypress, Laurel Oak and Slash Pine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Production Method Affects Growth and Root Regeneration of Leyland Cypress, Laurel Oak and Slash Pine
J. Roger Harris, Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1991, 17 (3) 64-69; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.017

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Production Method Affects Growth and Root Regeneration of Leyland Cypress, Laurel Oak and Slash Pine
J. Roger Harris, Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1991, 17 (3) 64-69; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.017
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire