Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Citizen Attitudes Toward Orangestriped Oakworm: Impact, Control, Host Aesthetics, and IPM Practices

Mark A. Coffelt and Peter B. Schultz
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 1991, 17 (11) 298-302; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1991.066
Mark A. Coffelt
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Hampton Roads Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter B. Schultz
Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Hampton Roads Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Citizen response to pictorial question 3 “How much damage did this insect do to your trees this year or the last 2 years?” and question 4 “How much damage would you be willing to accept? “

    %damage% Responding
    Question 3*Question 4
    WGRPWGRP
    0423030
    1518103330
    2529242828
    503232412
    755810
    100122440
    • ↵1 Significant difference between areas (P<0.05).

      WG = West Ghent, RP = Roland Park

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Citizen response to question 5 “If the City of Norfolk did not spray, would you hire a professional pest control operator or tree service?”*

    % Responding
    ResponseWGRP
    Yes6634
    No3364
    Not sure12
    and question 6 “How much would you be willing to pay per tree to have a professional spray?”*
    $/tree
    03466
    1-502714
    51-1013216
    102-1523.54
    >1533.50
    Mean ($)5621
    • * significant difference between areas (P<0.001). WG = West Ghent, RP = Roland Park

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Citizen response to the question “Which of these do you think is the most important?”

    % Responding
    CharacterWG*RP
    Attractive lawn2742
    Attractive trees3634
    Attractive shrubs2212
    Not sure1512
    • ↵* significant difference between areas (P<0.10).

      WG = West Ghent, RP = Roland Park

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Citizen response to question 7 “Would you be willing to pay $10 to help control the oakworm with nonchemical or natural control agents?” and question 8 “Do you think the pesticides sprayed on your trees are unsafe?”

    Response% Response
    Question 7*Question 8
    WGRPWGRP
    Yes89643938
    No7263438
    Not sure4102724
    • ↵* significant difference between areas (P<0.01).

      WG = West Ghent, RP = Roland Park

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 17, Issue 11
November 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Citizen Attitudes Toward Orangestriped Oakworm: Impact, Control, Host Aesthetics, and IPM Practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Citizen Attitudes Toward Orangestriped Oakworm: Impact, Control, Host Aesthetics, and IPM Practices
Mark A. Coffelt, Peter B. Schultz
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1991, 17 (11) 298-302; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.066

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Citizen Attitudes Toward Orangestriped Oakworm: Impact, Control, Host Aesthetics, and IPM Practices
Mark A. Coffelt, Peter B. Schultz
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 1991, 17 (11) 298-302; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1991.066
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire