Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Can Tree Susceptibility to Borers be Predicted from Root Starch Measurements?

James P. Dunn and Daniel A. Potter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1990, 16 (9) 236-239; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1990.053
James P. Dunn
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091EU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel A. Potter
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0091EU
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Carroll, J.E.,
    2. T.A. Tartar, and
    3. P.M. Wargo
    . 1983. Relationship of root starch to decline of sugar maple. Plant Disease 67:1347–1349.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cote, W.A. and
    2. D.C. Allen
    . 1980. Biology of two-lined chestnut borer, Agrilus bllineatus, in Pennsylvania & New York. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73:409–413.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. 3.↵
    1. Anderson, J.F. and
    2. H.K. Kaya
    1. Dunbar, D.M. and
    2. G.R. Stephens
    . 1975. The bionomics of the twolined chestnut borer, IN: Anderson, J.F. and H.K. Kaya, eds. Perspectives in Forest Entomology. Academic Press, pp. 73–86.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dunn, J.P.,
    2. T.W. Kimmerer, and
    3. D.A. Potter
    . 1987. Winter starch reserves of white oak as a predictor of attack by the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Weber) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Oecologia 74:352–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dunn, J.P.,
    2. D.A. Potter, and
    3. T.W. Kimmerer
    . 1990. Carbohydrate reserves, radial growth, and mechanisms of resistance of oak trees to phloem-boring insects. Oecologia. IN PRESS.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Haack, R.A. and
    2. D.M. Benjamin
    . 1982. The biology and ecology of the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus, on oaks, Quercus spp., in Wisconsin. Can. Entomol. 114:385–395.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Haack, R.A. and
    2. R.E. Accavetti
    . 1990. Twolined chestnut borer USDA For. Serv., Forest Insect Disease Leaflet. IN PRESS.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Johnson, W.T. and
    2. H.H. Lyon
    . 1988. Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. 556 pp.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kramer, P.J. and
    2. T.T. Kozlowski
    . 1979. Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla. 809 pp.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Solomon, J.D.
    1982. Annotations of selected insect borers of living hardwood trees and other woody plants from “Cooperative Plant Pest Reports”. USDA For. Serv. Information Bull. 32. 39 pp.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Stringer, J.W.,
    2. T.W. Kimmerer,
    3. J.C. Overstreet, and
    4. J.P. Dunn
    . 1989. S.J. Appl. For. 13:86–91.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wargo, P.M.
    1975. Estimating starch content in roots of deciduous trees - a visual technique. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-313. 9 pp.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Doane, C.C. and
    2. M.L. McManus
    1. Wargo, P.M.
    1981. Measuring response of trees to defoliation stress. In: Doane, C.C. and M.L. McManus (eds). The gypsy moth research toward integrated pest management. USDA For. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1584. pp. 225–267.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wargo, P.M.
    1988. Judging vigor of deciduous hardwoods. USDA Agr. Info. Bull. No. 418.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Waring, R.H. and
    2. W.H. Schlesinger
    . 1985. Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management. Academic Press, N.Y. 340 pp.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 16, Issue 9
September 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can Tree Susceptibility to Borers be Predicted from Root Starch Measurements?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Can Tree Susceptibility to Borers be Predicted from Root Starch Measurements?
James P. Dunn, Daniel A. Potter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1990, 16 (9) 236-239; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.053

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Can Tree Susceptibility to Borers be Predicted from Root Starch Measurements?
James P. Dunn, Daniel A. Potter
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1990, 16 (9) 236-239; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.053
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire