Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Systemic Treatment with Acephate for Gypsy Moth Management: Population Suppression and Wound Response

R.C. Reardon and R.E. Webb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1990, 16 (7) 174-178; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1990.041
R.C. Reardon
Forest Pest Management, USDA Forest Service, 180 Can field Street, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R.E. Webb
Forest Pest Management, USDA Forest Service, 180 Can field Street, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Butin, H. and
    2. A. Shigo
    1981. Radial shakes and “frost cracks” in living oak trees. USDA For. Ser. Res. Pap. NE-478. 21 pp.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fleischer, S.,
    2. D. Delorme,
    3. F. Ravlin, and
    4. R. Stipes
    . 1989. Implementation of acephate and injection of microbial insecticides into pin oaks for control of gypsy moth: time and efficiency comparisons. J. Arboric. 15:153–158.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Neely, D.
    1979. Tree wounds and wound closure. J. Arboric. 5:135–140.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Reardon, R.C.
    1984a. Two consecutive year applications of Orthene medicaps increase protection of grand fir against western spruce budworm. For. Ecol. Mgmt. 7:183–190.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Reardon, R.C.
    1984b. How to protect individual trees from western spruce budworm by implants and injections. CANUSA Spruce Budworm Program. Agric. Handbook. 625. 15 pp.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Reardon, R. and
    2. L. Barrett
    1984. Effects of treating western spruce budworm populations on grand fir and Douglas-fir with acephate, carbofuran, dimethoate, oxydemeton-methyl, and methamidophos. For. Ecol. Mgmt. 8:1–10.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Reardon, R.,
    2. L. Barrett,
    3. T. Koerber,
    4. L. Stipe and
    5. J. Dewey
    1985. Implantation and injection of systemics to suppress seed and cone insects in Douglas-fir in Montana.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Reardon, R. and
    2. M. Haskett
    1981. Effect of Orthene medicaps on populations of western spruce budworm on grand fir and Douglas-fir. J. Econ. Entomol. 74:266–270.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1986. A New Tree Biology. Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham, NH 595 pp.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shigo, A. and
    2. R. Campana
    1977. Discolored and decayed wood associated with injection wounds in American elm. J. Arboric. 3:230–235.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shigo, A.,
    2. W. Money, and
    3. D. Dodds
    1977. Some internal effects of Mauget tree injections. J. Arboric. 3:213–220.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Smith, E. and
    2. S. Treaster
    1981. Preventing habitual iron chlorosis of woody landscape plants. Ohio Agricultural Research & Development Center, Research Circular. 263:26–29.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Webb, R.,
    2. R. Reardon,
    3. A. Wieber,
    4. V. Boyde,
    5. H. Larew, and
    6. R. Argauer
    1988. Suppression of Lymantria dispar populations on oak using implants or injections of acephate and methamidophos. J. Econ. Entomol. 81:573–577.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kielboso, J.
    1. Wolfe, W.
    1978. A scientific and economic review of systemic implants in tree culture. 47–58 pp. In Symposium on Systemic Chemical Treatments in Tree Culture. Kielboso, J. editor, Michigan State Univ. 357 PP-
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 16, Issue 7
July 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systemic Treatment with Acephate for Gypsy Moth Management: Population Suppression and Wound Response
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Systemic Treatment with Acephate for Gypsy Moth Management: Population Suppression and Wound Response
R.C. Reardon, R.E. Webb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1990, 16 (7) 174-178; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.041

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Systemic Treatment with Acephate for Gypsy Moth Management: Population Suppression and Wound Response
R.C. Reardon, R.E. Webb
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1990, 16 (7) 174-178; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.041
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods and Materials
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Urban Trees and Cooling: A Review of the Recent Literature (2018 to 2024)
  • Aerial Imagery as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Tree Retention: Applications, Strengths and Challenges for Backyard Tree Planting Programs
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire