Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Trends and Issues in City Forests

J. James Kielbaso
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1990, 16 (3) 69-76; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1990.020
J. James Kielbaso
Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Akbari, H.,
    2. J. Huang
    , et al. 1988. The impact of summer heat islands on cooling energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Presented at ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Brown, R.D. and
    2. L. Cherkezoff
    . 1989. Of what comfort value, a tree? J. Arboric. 15:158–161.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Driver, B.L.,
    2. D. Rosenthal and
    3. G. Peterson
    . 1980. Social benefits of urban forests and related green spaces. Environmental Comment, November, 80:13–16.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Farb, Peter
    . 1962. Discussion in Proceedings of the Lockwood Conference on the Suburban Forest and Ecology, p. 33. Bull 652. The Conn. Ag. Expt. Station, New Haven.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Getz, D.A.,
    2. A. Karow and
    3. J. Kielbaso
    . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. J. Arboric. 8(10):258:263.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Giedraitis, J. and
    2. J. Kielbaso
    . 1982. Municipal tree Management. Urban Data Service Report, Vol. 14, No. 1. Washington, DC, International City Management Association, Washington, DC.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Grey, G. and
    2. F. Deneke
    . 1978. Urban Forestry. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 279 p.
  8. 8.↵
    1. G.W. Frankie and
    2. C.S. Koehler
    1. Kielbaso, J. and
    2. M.K. Kennedy
    . 1983. Urban forestry and entomology: a current appraisal. In: Urban Entomoloty: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, eds. G.W. Frankie and C.S. Koehler. Praeger Publishers: 423–440.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kielbaso, J.,
    2. B. Beauchamp,
    3. K. Larison and
    4. C. Randall
    . 1988. Trends in urban forestry management. Baseline Data Report 20(1), International City Management Association. Washington, DC.
  10. 10.↵
    1. McPherson, E.G. and
    2. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1986. Ecological measures of structure and change for street tree populations. Proceedings of the Third National Urban Forestry Conference, Orlando, p. 65–77.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Moll, G.
    1987. The state of our city forests. American Forests 93(5-6):61–64.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Moll, G. and
    2. D. Gangloff
    . 1987. Urban Forestry in the United States. Unasylva 39(1):36–45.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ottman, K., and
    2. J. Kielbaso
    . 1976. Managing municipal trees. Urban Data Service Report, November, 1976. International City Management Association, Washington, DC.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Profous, G.V. and
    2. R.E. Loeb
    . 1986. New York City woodlands and the special natural area districts. Arboric. Journal 10:131–150.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rowntree, R.
    1986. Ecological values of the urban forest. Proceedings of Third National Urban Forestry Conference. Orlando:22–24.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Shafer, E.L. and
    2. G. Moeller
    . 1979. Urban forestry: it’s scope and complexity. J. Arboric. 5(9):206–209.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sommer, R.
    et al. 1989. Householder evaluation of two street tree species. J. Arboric. 15:99–103.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 16, Issue 3
March 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trends and Issues in City Forests
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Trends and Issues in City Forests
J. James Kielbaso
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1990, 16 (3) 69-76; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Trends and Issues in City Forests
J. James Kielbaso
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1990, 16 (3) 69-76; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1990.020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Urban Forest
    • Values and Costs
    • Cultural Issues
    • Management Issues
    • Future
    • Summary
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire