Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Effectiveness of Methods Used to Reduce Harmful Effects of Compacted Soil Around Landscape Trees

Dennis R. Pittenger and Ted Stamen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1990, 16 (3) 55-57; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1990.16.3.55
Dennis R. Pittenger
Riverside County Cooperative Extension, University of California, Batchelor Hall Extension, Riverside, California 92521
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted Stamen
Riverside County Cooperative Extension, University of California, Batchelor Hall Extension, Riverside, California 92521
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Soil compaction is a serious problem for many established landscape trees because it reduces root growth and development (1, 9, 13). It occurs where foot, equipment or vehicular traffic repeatedly takes place especially when the soil is moist (10, 11). Compaction is particularly harmful when it occurs within 30 inches of the soil surface since this is the zone where most tree roots grow (4, 9).

Meaningful parameters for expressing compaction are penetrometer readings and bulk density determinations (1, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13). Soils with penetrometer values as low as 470 kPa reduced root growth of Austrian pine and Norway spruce seedlings (14) while soils with values of 2,500 kPa to 3,000 kPa stopped cotton and radiata pine growth (10, 12). The relationship of increased soil resistance to decreased root growth is linear in some instances (7). Bulk densities of 1.8 g/cm3 were shown to stop root growth in conifers (14).

Soil moisture content and soil texture can greatly affect soil strength and influence root systems’ response to compaction (8, 12, 14). Therefore, the most reliable comparisons of penetrometer readings are obtained when soils are at field capacity moisture content and are uniform loamy textured.

Compaction reduces aeration, infiltration and drainage in soils (2, 8, 10). It also increases the physical resistance (impedence) that roots must overcome in order to extend through the soil. Roots growing in compacted soil will be thicker and shorter with more lateral branching than those growing in uncompacted soil (4,6,7,13). This increases the surface area of the root system per volume of soil at shallow depths (6) and increases the possibility of drought stress (5, 13). Extremely high levels of compaction can actually crush the fine, 1-2 mm diameter roots of trees (13). The typical symptoms of affected trees range from reduced growth to dieback in the crown and eventual death.

Remedies used to reduce the effects of compaction on root systems of established trees attempt to improve aeration and water movement in the surrounding soil. However, the researchbased evidence to support these practices does not exist. Therefore, we initiated a study to evaluate the effectiveness of four commonly used methods in reducing the harmful effects of soil compaction around established landscape trees.

Methods and Materials

The study was conducted in a uniform block of 20 established Chinese wingnut trees (Pterocarya stenoptera) that had been serving as shade trees in a picnic ground for over ten years. Trees were spaced 6.1 × 9.1 meters apart in 5 rows to which a Latin square experimental design was applied. Irrigation was applied monthly with minisprinklers, and bare soil conditions were maintained with contact herbicides or hand cultivation. The irrigation schedule maintained soil moisture in the available range. Soil compaction in the planting was quantified with a recording penetrometer. The recording penetrometer was used because it accurately reflects soil strength, it is relatively quick and convenient for obtaining numerous samples over depth, and it has been correlated to root growth (10, 12). Values exceeding 2,500 kPa were consistently recorded at depths of 15 to 60 cm, but the trees appeared to be only slightly stressed in terms of overall vigor.

Analysis of the soil at the site revealed it to be a coarse sandy loam with a pH of 7.1 and soluble salts below 1.0 dS/m. Because the site possessed homogenous plant material and uniform loamy soil that was highly resistant to penetration, it was deemed ideal for use in the study.

In December of 1985 and January 1986, baseline soil penetration tests were performed using a recording penetrometer with a 9.15 mm diameter coneshaped tip and a probe length of 60 cm. Readings were recorded at distances of 5, 10 and 15 feet from the trunk in directions of east and west at each tree, and at distances of 5 and 10 feet in directions of north and south. Three penetrations were recorded at each distance. Soil moisture content was at field capacity at the time of testing. Readings were recorded to a depth of 60 cm or until penetration was no longer possible. Post-treatment penetrometer readings were obtained in the winter of 1988 to monitor any changes in soil strength with time.

Treatments were applied in March of 1986 and replicated 4 times with single trees serving as replicates. The treatments were: 1) 135 to 140, 5-cm holes created with a power auger and placed at a 60 degree angle to a depth of 45 cm. Holes were arranged in a spoke-fashion that formed 6 concentric circles 60 cm apart beginning 60 cm from the trunk. 2) Holes prepared as above then backfilled with a 1:1 mix of sand and milled fir bark. 3) Holes prepared with a high pressure water jet in the same fashion as treatment #1.4) Two holes, 10 cm in diameter by 45 cm deep placed 180 degrees apart and 1.5 m from the trunk. Holes were lined with perforated PVC pipe backfilled with gravel. 5) Untreated control.

Baseline growth data of each tree were recorded in January 1986. Tree height, trunk circumference at 15 cm from the soil surface, and annual growth of 4 lateral shoots in the upper ⅓ of the canopy were the parameters measured. During the dormant season in 1987 and 1988, the same growth data were recorded for each tree.

Results and Discussion

A summary of the tree growth data collected during the study is presented in Table 1. Tree height was difficult to measure precisely and varied significantly among trees within a treatment. Trunk diameter and annual shoot growth more precisely reflect growth. There were no significant differences in tree growth responses among treatments during the two-year period. No treatment was beneficial to this tree species grown under these soil and irrigation conditions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Mean tree growth responses*

The results indicate that where soil moisture content is consistently maintained in the readily available range, trees can grow and develop satisfactorily in compacted sandy loam soil. When soils of this type are compacted, soil moisture may be a more limiting factor than soil aeration. These findings support conclusions inferred by Zisa, et al. (14) in their study with conifers in urban soils. They concluded that seedling trees could successfully grow in signficantly compacted soils provided soil moisture is readily available.

Extensive use of aeration treatments in compacted sites should not be applied until soil moisture conditions and irrigation practices are carefully evaluated. When landscape trees appear to be stressed by compacted soil, tree care professionals should first ensure that soil moisture content is consistently maintained in the available range. Aeration treatments may not be necessary unless trees do not respond favorably to improved soil moisture conditions or unless drainage below the root system is so impaired that the soil remains saturated for extended periods after rainfall or irrigation. These situations indicate that soil aeration is limiting and in need of improvement. There are no published data that show which aeration method is most effective however.

  • © 1990, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alberty, C.A.,
    2. H.M. Pellett and
    3. D.H. Taylor
    . 1984. Characterization of soil compaction at construction sites and woody plant response. J. Environ. Hort. 2(2):48–53.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Craul, P.J.
    1985. A description of urban soils and their desired characteristics. J. Arboric. 11(11):330–339.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    1. Ehlers, W.,
    2. V. Kopke,
    3. F. Herse and
    4. W. Bohm
    . 1983. Penetration resistance and root growth of oats in tilled and unfilled loose soil. Soil Tillage Res. 3:261–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. I.A. Leone and
    3. F.B. Flower
    . 1987. Effect of soil compaction and oxygen content on vertical and horizontal root distribution. J. Environ. Hort. 5(1):33–36.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Grimes, D.W.,
    2. R.J. Miller and
    3. V.H. Schweers
    . 1972. Soil strength-modification of root development and soil water extraction. Cal. Ag. 26(11):12–14.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Liu, I.W. Y. and
    2. L.J. Waldron
    . 1988. Root growth in coarse-textured soil under controlled confining pressure and matric potential. Annl. Mtg. SSSA.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Pan, Elizabeth and
    2. Nina Bassuk
    . 1985. Effects of soil type and compaction on the growth of Ailanthus altissima seedlings. J. Environ. Hort. 3(4): 158–162.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pearson, R.W.
    1965. Soil environment and root development. Pp. 110–115. In W.H. Pierre, D. Kirkham, J. Pesek and R. Shaw. Plant Environment and Efficient Water Use. Am. Soc. Agron. and SSSA.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Perry, T.O.
    1982. The ecology of tree roots and the practical significance thereof. J. Arboric. 8(8): 197–211.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sands, R.,
    2. E.L. Greacen and
    3. C.J. Gerard
    . 1979. Compaction of sandy soils in radiata pine forests. I. A penetrometer study. Aust. J. Soil Res. 17:101–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.↵
    1. E.W. Carson
    1. Taylor, H.M.
    1974. Root behavior as affected by soil structure and strength. In: E.W. Carson (ed.). The Plant Root and Its Environment. Univ. Press of Va., Charlottesville. Pp. 27–291.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Taylor, H.M.,
    2. G.M. Roberson and
    3. J.J. Parker, Jr.
    1966. Soil strength-root penetration relations for medium- to coarse-textured soil materials. Soil Sci. 102(1): 18–22.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wargo, P.M.
    1983. Effects and consequences of stress on root physiology. J. Arboric. 9(7):173–177.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Zisa, R.P.,
    2. H.G. Halverson and
    3. B.B. Stout
    . 1980. Establishment and early growth of conifers on compact soils in urban areas. U.S. Forest Serv. Paper NE-451.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 16, Issue 3
March 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of Methods Used to Reduce Harmful Effects of Compacted Soil Around Landscape Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of Methods Used to Reduce Harmful Effects of Compacted Soil Around Landscape Trees
Dennis R. Pittenger, Ted Stamen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1990, 16 (3) 55-57; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1990.16.3.55

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effectiveness of Methods Used to Reduce Harmful Effects of Compacted Soil Around Landscape Trees
Dennis R. Pittenger, Ted Stamen
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1990, 16 (3) 55-57; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1990.16.3.55
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods and Materials
    • Results and Discussion
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire