Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Householder Evaluation of Two Street Tree Species

Robert Sommer, Philip A. Barker, Hartmut Guenther and Kenneth Kurani
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1989, 15 (4) 99-103; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1989.023
Robert Sommer
Director, Center for Consumer Research, 148 Everson Hall, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip A. Barker
Director, Center for Consumer Research, 148 Everson Hall, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Hartmut Guenther
Director, Center for Consumer Research, 148 Everson Hall, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Kurani
Director, Center for Consumer Research, 148 Everson Hall, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Anderson, L.M. and
    2. H.W. Schroeder
    . 1983. Application of wildlife scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning 10:219–237.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Aoki, Y.
    1975. A study on the method of measurement of green environment in residential areas. Papers of the 10th Scientific Research Meeting, City Planning Institute of Japan, pp. 163–168.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gerhold, Henry D.
    1. Barker, P.A.
    1983. Some urban trees of California: Maintenance problems and genetic improvement possibilities. In: Gerhold, Henry D. Proceedings of the fourth biennial conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University School of Forest Resources; 1983:47–54.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Santamour, F.S. et al.
    1. Brush, R.O., and
    2. T.A. Moore
    . 1976. Some psychological and social aspects of trees in the city. In: Santamour, F.S. et al., Eds. Better Trees for Metropolitan Landscapes. Technical report NE. 22, Forest Service, USDA, 25-28.
  5. 5.↵
    1. D.F. Karnosky and
    2. S.L. Karnosky
    1. Dwyer, J.F.
    1985. The economic value of urban plants. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Urban Horticulture. ( D.F. Karnosky and S.L. Karnosky, eds.) New York Botanical Garden Institute of Urban Horticulture Publications Number 2, pp. 15–27.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Getz, D.A.,
    2. A. Karnow, and
    3. J. J. Kielbaso
    . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. J. Arboric. 8:258–263.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Grey, G.W. and
    2. F.J. Deneke
    . 1986. Urban Forestry (2nd edition). Wiley, New York.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Andresen, J.W.
    1. Legg, M.H. and
    2. R.R. Hicks
    . 1976. Public decision making in selecting trees for human settlements. In: Andresen, J.W. ed. Trees and Forests for Human Settlements. Center for Urban Forestry Studies, Univ. of Toronto, Canada, pp. 275–285.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Payne, B.R.
    1973. The 29-tree home improvement plan. Natural History, 82:74–75.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W. and
    2. W.N. Cannon
    . 1983. The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio towns. J. Arboric. 9:237–243.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shafer, E.L. and
    2. T. Richards
    . 1974. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-302. Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ulrich, R.S.
    1986. Human response to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13:29–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 15, Issue 4
April 1989
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Householder Evaluation of Two Street Tree Species
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Householder Evaluation of Two Street Tree Species
Robert Sommer, Philip A. Barker, Hartmut Guenther, Kenneth Kurani
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1989, 15 (4) 99-103; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1989.023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Householder Evaluation of Two Street Tree Species
Robert Sommer, Philip A. Barker, Hartmut Guenther, Kenneth Kurani
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1989, 15 (4) 99-103; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1989.023
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Procedure
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgement
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • street tree
  • tree commission
  • tree maintenance
  • evaluation

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire