Householder Evaluation of Two Street Tree Species

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Anderson, L.M. and
   2. H.W. Schroeder

   . 1983. Application of wildlife scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning 10:219–237.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Aoki, Y.

   1975. A study on the method of measurement of green environment in residential areas. Papers of the 10th Scientific Research Meeting, City Planning Institute of Japan, pp. 163–168.
3. 3.↵
   1. Gerhold, Henry D.

   1. Barker, P.A.

   1983. Some urban trees of California: Maintenance problems and genetic improvement possibilities. In: Gerhold, Henry D. Proceedings of the fourth biennial conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University School of Forest Resources; 1983:47–54.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Santamour, F.S. et al.

   1. Brush, R.O., and
   2. T.A. Moore

   . 1976. Some psychological and social aspects of trees in the city. In: Santamour, F.S. et al., Eds. Better Trees for Metropolitan Landscapes. Technical report NE. 22, Forest Service, USDA, 25-28.
5. 5.↵
   1. D.F. Karnosky and
   2. S.L. Karnosky

   1. Dwyer, J.F.

   1985. The economic value of urban plants. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Urban Horticulture. ( D.F. Karnosky and S.L. Karnosky, eds.) New York Botanical Garden Institute of Urban Horticulture Publications Number 2, pp. 15–27.
6. 6.↵
   1. Getz, D.A.,
   2. A. Karnow, and
   3. J. J. Kielbaso

   . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. J. Arboric. 8:258–263.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Grey, G.W. and
   2. F.J. Deneke

   . 1986. Urban Forestry (2nd edition). Wiley, New York.
8. 8.↵
   1. Andresen, J.W.

   1. Legg, M.H. and
   2. R.R. Hicks

   . 1976. Public decision making in selecting trees for human settlements. In: Andresen, J.W. ed. Trees and Forests for Human Settlements. Center for Urban Forestry Studies, Univ. of Toronto, Canada, pp. 275–285.
9. 9.↵
   1. Payne, B.R.

   1973. The 29-tree home improvement plan. Natural History, 82:74–75.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W. and
    2. W.N. Cannon

    . 1983. The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio towns. J. Arboric. 9:237–243.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Shafer, E.L. and
    2. T. Richards

    . 1974. A comparison of viewer reactions to outdoor scenes and photographs of those scenes. USDA Forest Service Research Paper NE-302. Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Upper Darby, PA.
12. 12.↵
    1. Ulrich, R.S.

    1986. Human response to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13:29–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science