Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Wounding, Compartmentalization, and Treatment Tradeoffs

Kevin T. Smith
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1988, 14 (9) 226-229; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1988.054
Kevin T. Smith
USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, P.O. Box 640, Durham, New Hampshire 03824
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Wounds damage trees. Tree care professionals routinely wound trees to apply fungicides, nutrients, and growth regulators. The practitioner knowingly makes the tradeoff of tree damage for the benefit expected to be gained by the chemical treatment. This paper is an overview of the effects of wounding on trees. It is directed to practitioners who make these tradeoff decisions of damage and benefit.

Trees are wounded throughout their lives, from broken branches, impacts and abrasions, animal damage, etc. Wounds large and small set into motion a cascade of events that may eventually lead to decayed, physically degraded wood. People who commonly work with trees know all of these things; what is not so well known is that the presence of decayed wood may not be the most harmful result of wounding trees. The practitioner must not get over-confident that his tradeoff of wounding for treatment is in the tree’s benefit merely due to the absence of visibly decayed wood.

One riddle of tree biology is that the tree is threatened both by the failure and by the success of its own wound response system (4). This coordinated system that limits damage due to wounding is compartmentalization (3, 5, 11). The concept of compartmentalization is based upon the analytical dissections of many trees with natural or experimentally inflicted wounds. Compartmentalization explains the patterns of discoloration and decay seen in living trees.

Briefly, compartmentalization is a two-stage boundary-setting process. The first stage is to confine the effects of injury within boundaries that result in the smallest possible volume of affected wood. Some qualities that influence this process are built into the static architecture of the wood itself such as the cell types, sizes, and arrangement. Other features of this stage are boundaries formed by tyloses, plugging materials, and toxic substances. The second stage of compartmentalization protects wood formed following wounding from the decay process initiated by that wound. This involves the formation by the cambium of anatomically distinct boundaries known as barrier zones. None of these boundaries is absolute. All boundaries may fail in time. Trees vary in their genetic ability to compartmentalize (7, 10). The patterns of decay that are frequently encountered such as central hollows and rotting branch stubs surrounded by sound collars are all accounted for by compartmentalization. One simplification of this complex process is the CODIT (Compartmentalization Of Decay In Trees) model that refers to these boundaries as “walls” (3). The term “wall” ought not to be taken too literally, as the boundaries of compartmentalization may change in shape and position over time.

To illustrate the compartmentalization process, consider a hardwood tree on a warm and sunny spring day at the time when the leaves are not yet fully expanded. Various layers of outer bark, impregnated with waterproofing and toxic chemicals, protect the living inner bark (phloem), vascular cambium, and sapwood from dessication, mechanical damage, pests, and pathogens. Water is flowing up the outer rings of sapwood to replace water lost by transpiration and to provide the turgor necessary to unfold leaves. This flowing water is actually under tension, or is being “stretched” within the open, water-conducting vessels. Within the sapwood, there are orderly patterns of conducting vessels that move water and minerals up the tree. Ray cells arranged in incomplete sheets form the radial transport system throughout the sapwood. In the rays and interspersed with the vessels are living parenchyma cells, many of which store protective chemicals such as phenols as well ąs starch produced from photosynthesis of previous years.

The use of a trade, firm or corporation name does not constitute endorsement by the Forest Service or the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Now introduce a drill wound into this ordered system. Similar consequences would occur with other types of injection and implantation wounds. As the drill is applied to the trunk surface, the waterproofed and chemically impregnated protective outer bark is cut and removed, followed by the removal of phloem that actively transports photosynthate from the leaves to growing tips and storage tissues. Continuing inward, the drill bit cuts into the vascular cambium, the tissue that grows new cells around the circumference of the stem and branches. Depending on the sharpness of the drill bit, the cambial cells are cleanly cut or ripped and torn beyond the perimeter of the drill. As the bit cuts into the sapwood, the water column (previously under tension) within each severed vessel snaps as air rushes in to equalize the pressure within the tree to the atmosphere. As the air rushes in, bacteria and fungal spores are also drawn into the vessels.

Shortly after wounding, the first stage of compartmentalization occurs. Water conduction in sapwood vessels above and below the wound is blocked with tyloses and other plugs. A tylosis is an outgrowth of the membrane from a specialized parenchyma cell into a vessel. As tyloses are formed, sapwood parenchyma shift their metabolism from normal energy-yielding metabolism to the production of poisoning phenolic and terpene substances. Some of these substances exist prior to wounding and following wounding are oxidized by shifts in enzyme activity in the presence of increasingly available oxygen. The oxidation products of phenols may be more toxic than their parent chemicals. Some of these poisoning materials cover or become incorporated into tyloses. This shift in metabolism accomplishes two complementary ends. First, as simple sugars and starch are consumed, they are no longer available as food for invading microorganisms. Secondly, the products of these metabolic shifts are broadly toxic or inhibitory to the microorganisms.

One consequence of these metabolic shifts is that the parenchyma cells die and the affected sapwood around the wound is essentially cut off from the living network by the blockage of vessels, depletion of energy reserves, and death of cells. Although this affected sapwood is in physical contact with the rest of the stem, it is functionally outside of the dynamic, living tree. Within two months, dissection of wounded wood tissues reveals a tapered column of discoloration above and below the wound. Beyond the visible discoloration, wood is altered by increasing ionization that is detectable by electrical measurements and is associated with decreased decay resistance in conifer species (13). What ought to concern the tree care professional is not the discoloration itself, but that the discoloration indicates that the tissue is cut out of the living network.

The key to the second stage of compartmentalization is the activity of the vascular cambium. Sapwood damaged by wounding is never healed in the sense of being repaired or replaced. The vascular cambium produces new, fully functional sapwood capable of energy storage, active response, and water movement. If the drill bit is sharp, the cambium is minimally damaged by drilling. A dull bit can cause extensive damage, resulting in cambial dieback that could greatly lengthen the time necessary to form functional sapwood around the circumference of the stem. Cambial dieback also can occur if the cambium is split in the injection process.

A distinction must be made between this new, fully functional sapwood produced by the cambium and the production of callus (generally formed by outgrowth of ray cells) is a wholly separate process. Callus tissue is important for wound closure, but it does not fully function in the same sense that sapwood does. Callus lacks the precise organization necessary to efficiently conduct water, store starch, or respond to stimuli such as wounding. Strong callus production indicates that the tree is relatively vigorous, but is not related to a strong compartmentalization response.

Certain chemical treatments introduced through wounds hinder the compartmentalization process and are more damaging than the wound itself. Boundary-setting is forced further away from the wound site, resulting in a greater volume of affected tissue as was shown with injection of Stemix in red maple and benzimidazole derivatives in American elm (1, 9). Of greater potential damage are those chemicals that induce cambial dieback as has been shown with Bidrin injected into red maple (9). This type of aggravated damage is especially serious as it delays barrier zone formation and greatly retards the production of new, functional sapwood.

Additional problems are posed by treatments requiring multiple wounds. In the case of annually administered multiple wounds, barrier zones formed within the current growth ring may coalesce, placing the tree’s entire need for water conduction, starch storage, and wound response to a portion of a single growth ring (7). For American elms infected with Dutch elm disease, multiple wounding is especially serious as functional sapwood is lost both by the disease and by the treatment (8). Wounding for treatment every two or three years is comparatively advantageous in that more functional sapwood will be produced between wounding episodes to support the tree’s physiological needs of growth, protection, and defense. However, this advantage only accrues if the tree is vigorously growing.

Increased attention is being given to wounds made parallel to the ground and angled obliquely away from the pith. Chemical materials such as growth inhibitors are taken up more quickly from oblique wounds than from strictly radial ones as a larger portion of the wound will occur in the conducting rings of the outer sapwood. These wounds may be especially damaging as they cut off a larger portion of the outer sapwood from the dynamic ray cell network, thus further reducing the sapwood available to the tree for healthy functioning.

Tree care workers have benefited from the development of systemic treatments applied through wounds. Individual trees have benefited from these treatments. Yet, there is a tradeoff of damage for expected benefit. The problem is that the damage is hidden. The development of decay from wounded tissues may pose a long-term problem. A more immediate concern is a tree’s loss of functional sapwood as tissues respond to wounding. These responses are essential for tree survival, yet they make the tree more vulnerable by reducing the capacity to respond to future demands.

The challenge to researchers is to develop new types of tree treatments that work in concert with the natural system of tree defense and protection as has been suggested for wound treatment (12). When the practitioner chooses chemical treatments to be applied through wounds, the guidelines presented by Shigo and Campana (6) and Shigo (2) should be followed:

Make clean-edged holes as shallow, narrow, and few in number as possible.

Place holes as low as possible on trunk ridges and not on roots or trunk depressions between roots.

Place multiple wounds of a single treatment in a spiral around the trunk circumference, avoiding apparent dead spots.

Before repeating injections in successive years, observe the previous wounds and do not wound an individual again if poor closure suggests low vigor.

And most of all, be aware that this type of treatment causes damage of its own that is not visible until the tree is felled and sectioned.

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵1. Presented at the Symposium on Systemic Chemical Treatments in Tree Culture at Michigan State University, East Lansing in October 1987.

  • © 1988, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

Listen
  1. 1.↵
    1. Andersen, J.L.,
    2. R.J. Campana,
    3. A.L. Shigo, and
    4. W.C. Shortle
    . 1985. Wound response of Ulmus americana I: Results of chemical Injection in attempts to control Dutch elm disease. J. Arboric. 11:137–142.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1986. A New Tree Biology. Shigo and Trees, Associates, Durham NH. 595 pp.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1985a. Compartmentalization of decay in trees. Sci. Amer. 252:96–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1985b. Wounded forests, starving trees. J. Forestry 83:668–673.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.
    1984. Compartmentalization: a conceptual framework for understanding how trees grow and defend themselves. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 22:189–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L. and
    2. R. Campana
    . 1977. Discolored and decayed wood associated with injection wounds in American elm. J. Arboric. 3:230–235.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.,
    2. R. Campana,
    3. F. Hyland, and
    4. J. Andersen
    . 1980. Anatomy of elms injected to control Dutch elm disease. J. Arboric. 6:96–100.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.,
    2. G.F. Gregory,
    3. R.J. Campana,
    4. K.R. Dudzik, and
    5. D.M. Zimel
    . 1986. Patterns of starch reserves in healthy and diseased American elms. Can. J. For. Res. 16:204–210.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.,
    2. W.E. Money, and
    3. D.I. Dodds
    . 1977. Some internal effects of Mauget tree injections. J. Arboric. 3:213–220.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.,
    2. W.C. Shortle, and
    3. P. Garrett
    . 1977. Compartmentalization of discolored and decayed wood associated with injection-type wounds in hybrid poplar. J.Arboric. 3:114–118.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Shortle, W.C.
    1984. Biochemical mechanisms of discolouration, decay, and compartmentalisation of decay in trees. Inter. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. n.s. 5:100–104.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Smith, K.T.,
    2. R.O. Blanchard, and
    3. W.C. Shortle
    . 1981. Postulated mechanism of biological control of decay fungi in red maple wounds treated with Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 71:496–498.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Smith, K.T. and
    2. W.C. Shortle
    . 1988. Electrical resistance and wood decay by white rot fungi. Mycologia 80:124–126.
    OpenUrl
  14. 11.
    1. Shortle, W.C.
    1984. Biochemical mechanisms of discolouration, decay, and compartmentalisation of decay in trees. Inter. Assoc. Wood Anat. Bull. n.s. 5:100–104.
    OpenUrl
  15. 12.
    1. Smith, K.T.,
    2. R.O. Blanchard, and
    3. W.C. Shortle
    . 1981. Postulated mechanism of biological control of decay fungi in red maple wounds treated with Trichoderma har· zianum. Phytopathology 71:496–498.
    OpenUrl
  16. 13.
    1. Smith, K.T. and
    2. W.C. Shortle
    . 1988. Electrical resistance and wood decay by white rot fungi. Mycofogia 80:124–126.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 14, Issue 9
September 1988
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Wounding, Compartmentalization, and Treatment Tradeoffs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Wounding, Compartmentalization, and Treatment Tradeoffs
Kevin T. Smith
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1988, 14 (9) 226-229; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1988.054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Wounding, Compartmentalization, and Treatment Tradeoffs
Kevin T. Smith
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1988, 14 (9) 226-229; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1988.054
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire