Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Treatment of Pitch Canker on Monterey Pine With Fungisol Injection

Steven A. Tjosvold and Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1988, 14 (5) 135-136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1988.14.5.135
Steven A. Tjosvold
Agricultural Extension, University of California, 1432 Freedom Boulevard, Watson ville, California 95076
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur H. McCain
Agricultural Extension, University of California, 1432 Freedom Boulevard, Watson ville, California 95076
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fungisol injections into mature Monterey pines with pitch canker, caused by Fusarium subglutinans, failed to eradicate pre-existing branch infections and did not prevent disease when trees were artificially inoculated or infected naturally.

Pitch canker, a disease of pines, was found in the summer of 1986 to affect several thousand Monterey pines throughout Santa Cruz county, California. Although Monterey pine (Pinus radiata)was the principal species infected, allepo pine (Pinus halepensis), Bishop pine (Pinus muricata),and Italian Stone pine (Pinus pinea) were infected as well. Several hundred infected trees were found in nearby counties.

Pitch canker is caused by the fungus Fusarium subglutinans. It primarily causes branch dieback and cankers on the trunks. All infected tissue is resin-soaked and stained an amber color. Often copious pitch exudes from infected tissue. Many pitch canker-infected trees are dying. Whether tree death is caused primarily by the disease or by the insects that are attracted to the unhealthy trees is under investigation.

Several control strategies have been proposed. One strategy is doing essentially nothing because it is thought that the fungus will not kill trees and infected trees will recover. Another strategy proposes removal of moderately to severely infected trees to reduce the fungus (inoculum) levels and therefore reduce disease incidence. A third strategy proposes injecting the trees with the fungicide DEBC 2-(2-ethoxyethoxy) ethyl-2-benzimidazole carbamate (Fungisol). The J.J. Mauget Co. has a registration for Fungisol in California for pine pitch canker control and apparently had efficacy data to support its registration. This paper reports the results of injecting mature Monterey pines with Fungisol.

Materials and Methods

Ten Monterey pines were selected for the experiment. They were approximately 35 feet high, 18” in diameter, and spaced an average of 12 feet apart in a row. Each tree had numerous branches apparently infected with pitch canker. To confirm that pitch canker was present, a sample from a diseased branch was randomly selected and removed from each tree. The plant pathology laboratory at U.C. Berkeley confirmed the presence of F. subglutinans in each sample.

Fungisol was applied March 30, 1987 using Mauget injectors spaced every 5 to 6 inches at the base of every other tree. Five trees were injected and five were untreated. Each treated tree received approximately 10 injections by a tree service professional who had substantial experience using the Mauget system. The trees had not absorbed the entire dosage of Fungisol (4 ml per injection) by the end of the day so the injectors were removed for safety reasons. On April 4 the same trees were injected as before and most of the Fungisol was absorbed. Conservatively, with both applications, each tree received at least a full dosage as recommended on the label.

To test the prophylactic effectiveness of Fungisol to prevent pitch canker infections, two healthy branches of each tree were inoculated approximately 1, 2, 3 and 4 months following Fungisol injection. An inoculation was made by pricking a branch through the soft bark about 1 inch below its tip with a dissecting needle covered with F. subglutinans. The trees were observed once a month for disease symptoms.

To test the therapeutic effectiveness of Fungisol to eradicate the fungus from pre-existing infection, a naturally infected branch was removed from each tree 4 months after the last Fungisol injection. The samples were sent to the U.C. Berkeley pathology lab to confirm presence or absence of the fungus.

Results and Discussions

The experiment was concluded approximately 6 months after Fungisol injection on September 30. Pitch canker was present on every inoculated stem of injected and noninjected trees. (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Incidence of Pitch canker symptoms on inoculated stems in untreated and treated trees.

Symptoms first appeared approximately 6 weeks after inoculation and by 8 weeks were fully manifested. Clearly the Fungisol treatments did not prevent development of disease in inoculated branches. In addition, by the end of the experiment there were new naturally-infected branches in both untreated and treated trees.

A previously infested branch from each tree was sampled 4 months after the last Fungisol injection. Isolations in culture demonstrated that every branch contained F. subglutinans. Clearly Fungisol treatments did not eradicate the fungus from diseased branches.

Laboratory tests at U.C. Berkeley demonstrated that DEBC inhibited growth of F. subglutinans in culture, however, since disease developed in spite of injections it is suspected that DEBC did not accumulate in sufficient concentration in susceptible tissues to limit development of the fungus.

DEBC moves passively in the water-conducting tissues of pines and would be expected to accumulate in needles, where the water is transpired. It seems unlikely that DEBC could accumulate in diseased branches where the fungus has undoubtedly cut off water movement into it. Apparently even in healthy inoculated tissue, where you would expect good water/chemical movement, the DEBC concentration was not sufficient to prevent infection. Based on this study, Fungisol injection is not effective in controlling pitch canker in Monterey pine.

Footnotes

  • ↵1. Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Berkeley

  • © 1988, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 14, Issue 5
May 1988
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment of Pitch Canker on Monterey Pine With Fungisol Injection
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Treatment of Pitch Canker on Monterey Pine With Fungisol Injection
Steven A. Tjosvold, Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1988, 14 (5) 135-136; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1988.14.5.135

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Treatment of Pitch Canker on Monterey Pine With Fungisol Injection
Steven A. Tjosvold, Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1988, 14 (5) 135-136; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1988.14.5.135
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussions
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire