Relative Susceptibility of Thirteen Pine Species to Sodium Chloride Spray

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. Barrick, W.E.,
   2. J.A. Flore, and
   3. H. Davidson.

   1979. Deicing salt spray injury in selected Pinus spp. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104: 617–622.

   OpenUrl
2. 2.↵
   1. Buschbom, U.

   1968. Salt resistance of aerial shoots of woody plants. 1. Effects of chlorides on shoot surfaces. Flora 157: 527–561.

   OpenUrl
3. 3.↵
   1. Davidson, H.

   1970. Pine mortality along Michigan highways. HortScience 5: 12–13.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Demeritt, M.E., Jr.

   1973. Prospects for selecting and breeding trees resistant to deicing salts. Northeast. For. Tree. Improv. Conf. Proc. 20: 130–140.
5. 5.↵
   1. Dirr, M.A.

   1976. Selection of trees for tolerance to salt injury. J Arboric. 2: 209–216.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Hall, R.,
   2. G. Hofstra, and
   3. G.P. Lumis.

   1972. Effects of deicing salt on eastern white pine: Foliar injury, growth suppression, and seasonal changes in foliar concentrations of sodium and chloride. Can. J. For. Res. 2:244–249.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Hofstra, G., and
   2. R. Hall.

   1971. Injury on roadside trees: leaf injury on pine and white cedar in relation to foliar levels of sodium and chloride. Can J. Bot. 49:613–622.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Holloway, P.J.

   1969. Chemistry of leaf waxes in relation to wetting. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 20: 124–128.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. LaCroix, R.L.,
   2. D.R. Keeney, and
   3. L.M. Walsh.

   1970. Potentiometric titration of chloride in plant tissue extracts using the chloride ion electrode. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 1: 1–6.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Logan, E.T.

    1975. Factors affecting salt tolerance of Pinus strobu. and Pinus thunbergi.. M.S. Thesis. Rutgers Univ. 106pp.
11. 11.↵
    1. Lumis, G.P.,
    2. G. Hofstra, and
    3. R. Hall

    . 1973. Sensitivity of roadside trees and shrubs to aerial dift of deicing salt. HortScience 8: 475–477.
12. 12.↵
    1. Moss, A.E.

    1940. Effect on trees of wind-driven salt water. J. For. 38: 421–425.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Norris, R.F., and
    2. M.J. Bukovac.

    1970. Structure of the pear leaf cuticle with special reference to cuticular penetrations. Amer. J. Bot. 55: 975–983.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Pyykko, M.

    1977. Effects of salt spray on growth and development of Pinus sylvestris L. Ann. Bot. Fennici 14: 49–61.

    OpenUrl
15. 15.↵
    1. Simini, M., and
    2. I.A. Leone.

    1982. Effect of environmental factors on chloride uptake on trees exposed to salt spray. Phytopathology 72: 1163–1166.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Sucoff, E.

    1975. Effect of deicing salts on woody vegetation along Minnesota roads. Univ. of Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 303, St. Paul, MN. 49 pp.
17. 17.↵
    1. Sucoff, E.,
    2. R. Feller, and
    3. D. Kanten.

    1975. Deicing salt (sodium chloride) damage to Pinus resinosa Ait. Can. J. For Res. 5: 546–556.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.

    1980. Response of selected tree species to sodium chloride. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 878–883.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.

    1983. Short-term response of seven pine species to sodium chloride spray. J. Environ. Hort. 1: 7–9.

    OpenUrl
20. 20.↵
    1. Townsnd, A.M.

    1984. Effect of sodium chloride on tree seedlings in two potting media. Environ. Pollut. 34:333–344.

    OpenUrl