Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Relative Susceptibility of Thirteen Pine Species to Sodium Chloride Spray

A.M. Townsend and W.F. Kwolek
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) September 1987, 13 (9) 225-228; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1987.13.9.225
A.M. Townsend
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
W.F. Kwolek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Seedlings of 13 pine species were sprayed with either NaCI spray or distilled water for 3 consecutive winters. Pinus thunbergii, P. ponderos., and Pinus nigr. were generally most tolerant, with the least foliar injury, best survival, and least growth reduction. Pinus strobus, P. banksiana, P. cembra, P. peuc., and P. densiflor. were most susceptible. Species intermediate in susceptibility were P. strobiformis, P. aristata, P. parviflora, P. resinos., and P. sylvestri.. Species with the lowest internal sodium and chloride levels after treatment generally were most tolerant to the salt spray.

It is now well documented that salt used for deicing of streets and highways can injure many woody species (3, 5, 7, 16). Trees and shrubs can be injured by salt spray, by salt that leaches into the soil or by a combination of these two (4, 18, 20).

Pine species are planted in large numbers along streets and highways in the United States and in other countries. Injury to pines by deicing salts is very often caused by salt spray (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17). It is important to learn which pine species are most suitable for salt-exposed sites. A previous one-year study showed variation among 5-needled pines in their short-term response to salt spray (19). In the present study, the relative tolerance of 13 pine species to salt spray was evaluated for more than 3 years.

Materials and Methods

Species used were Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergi.), ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderos.), Austrian pine (Pinus nigr.), southwestern white pine (Pinus strobiformi.), Swiss stone pine (Pinus cembr.), Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflor.), bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata), Japanese white pine (Pinus parviflora), Balkan pine (Pinus peuc.), red pine (Pinus resinos.), Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestri.), jack pine (Pinus banksian.), and eastern white pine (Pinus strobu.). Seedlings 31-46 cm tall of these species were grown in 4.7 L pots in a 2:2:1 (v/v/v) peat: perlite: soil mix, in a lath house. Seedlings were arranged in a split plot design in 2 blocks, with salt or water spray representing major plots and species representing minor plots, there were 24 seedlings of each species for each treatment (salt or water-spray). Plastic bags kept salt out of the soil mix, and plastic sheets separated salt water and plain water plots.

Plants were sprayed in late winter or early spring for 3 consecutive years. Some seedlings were sprayed with distilled water only as controls. In year one, the other seedlings were sprayed to run-off with distilled water either with or without 2% NaCI solution once daily from Monday through Friday for 4 weeks (of March 3, March 10, March 24, and March 31), then with 10% NaCI on April 14, 15, and 16. In year two, they were sprayed with 10% NaCI for 5 days per week for 2 weeks beginning March 25, and for 2 days in mid-April. In year three they were sprayed with a 20% NaCI solution for a total of 10 days during the weeks of March 8 and March 22. Foliar symptoms were evaluated by estimating the percent chlorosis and necrosis on the needles of each seedling; data on symptoms were recorded the first year 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 1 7 weeks after spraying ended. Survival was recorded 17 weeks, 1, 2, and 2½ years after the final spray of the first year. New yearly growth was measured after the second, third, and fourth growing season.

Four weeks after completion of the first year’s spraying, needle samples were taken from needles throughout each seedling for determination of sodium and chloride levels. External chloride was removed by two 1 -min rinses in 150 ml of distilled, deionized water. Needles were then oven-dried (70°C for 48 hrs) and weighed.

Dried needles were ground to a 20-mesh size using a Wiley mill. Chloride was determined by the method of La Croix et a. (9), in which a specific ion electrode is used to determine the endpoint of AgNO3 titration. Sodium was analyzed with an inductively coupled plasma spectrograph at the Research Extension Analytical Laboratory, OARDC, Wooster, Ohio.

Results

Survival significantly decreased for many species over time (Table 1). Survival of P. strobus, P. resinosa, P. aristat., and P. densiflor. decreased within 17 weeks after the first year’s spraying. After 2½ years, survival of only P. strobiformis, P. nigra, P. thunbergi., and P. ponderos. had not significantly decreased in response to the salt application. In contrast, survival of P. cembra, P. banksiana, P. strobus, P. peuce. and P. aristat. was less than 20 per cent of control seedlings’ survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Foliar symptoms and survival of 13 pine species subjected to NaCI spray

The characteristic symptom of injury was browning of the needles that began at the tips and progressed towards the base. Significant differences in foliar symptoms among species appeared 2 weeks after the first salt application was made, and were quite large 15 weeks later (Table 1). P. strobu. showed the most symptoms, whereas P. thunbergii, P. ponderos. and P. nigr. showed the least symptoms. Other species showed pronounced injury, but still less than that of P. strobus. Pinus ponderos. showed the lowest and P. strobu. the highest concentrations of needle surface chloride, internal chloride, and internal sodium (Table 2). Pinus strobiformis, P. thunbergii. and P. cembr. also had low levels of needle surface chloride. Pinus ponderosa, P. cembra, P. strobiformis, P. nigra. and P. thunbergi. were low in internal chloride and internal sodium whereas P. strobus, P. sylvestris, P. peuce. and P. parviflor. were high. In a correlation analysis of data, we found that high levels of foliar sodium and chloride were significantly associated across species with less new growth, more symptoms, and low survival.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Average chloride and sodium concentrations in needles from pine seedlings treated with NaClz.

Height growth was most suppressed by salt in P. strobus, P. densiflora, P. bankslana. and P. cembra. and was least suppressed in P. nigra, P. ponderosa. and P. thunbergi. (Fig. 1). These latter species showed greater suppression of new growth the second year after spraying began than in the third and fourth years.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Yearly height growth of sodium chloride-treated pine seedlings (expressed as a per cent of water-treated trees). Years 2, 3, and 4 refer to the second, third, and fourth years after the first year of salt treatment.

Discussion

Salt tolerance (best survival, least foliar symptoms, and least growth reduction — i.e., Pinus thunbergii, P. ponderosa, P. nigra. accompanied low internal chloride and sodium. The highly susceptible species (with poor susceptible high foliar injury, and great growth reduction) were P. strobus, P. banksiana, P. cembra, P. peuce. and P. densiflora. The intermediates were P. strobiformis, P. aristata, P. parviflora, P. resinosa. and P. sylvestris.

In this study, Pinus ponderos. appeared very salt-tolerant; it deserves more testing wherever salt-spray occurs. P. strobiformi. was the most salt-tolerant 5-needled pine. It could replace P. strobu. on salt-spray sites.

Most species with low internal sodium and chloride levels tolerated salt spray. We (19) and others (6, 7) found this pattern also in earlier, shortterm salt studies of pines.

One species, P. cembra. shows anomalous results: low levels of needle surface chloride, internal chloride, and internal sodium, yet the most severely reduced growth and survival 3 years after treatments. Pinus cembr. may exclude most of these ions but be injured by extreme sensitivity to those few ions that do enter.

Needle thickness of P. nigra, P. ponderos., and P. thunbergi. may help exclude salt ions. Barrick et a.. (1) considered that differences in epicuticular waxes and needle surface characteristics explained greater salt tolerance in P. nigra (vs. P. strobus.. Logan (10) considered that the cuticle of P. nigr., twice the thickness of that of P. strobu., was responsible for its greater tolerance to salt spray.

The quantity and quality of surface waxes appear to play an important role in the foliar uptake of polar solutions in general (8, 13). Holloway (8) showed surface wax to be an effective hydrophobic barrier to liquids with high surface tension if the wax covers the entire epidermis. Plants containing plate-like, overlapping leaf waxes are less penetrable to polar solutions like salt water than those with vertically oriented rod-like waxes, which do not entirely cover the surface. Differences in wax structure and cuticle thickness may explain differences among pine species’ sensitivity to deicing salt, but further studies are needed. Tolerant species, which generally accumulated the lowest quantities of needle surface chloride in this study, may be able to present a better hydrophobic barrier to entry of salt solution.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Warren O. Masters for the technical assistance in carrying out this experiment.

Footnotes

  • ↵1. Mathematical Statistician (Retired), USDA Agricultural Research Service, Peoria, IL 61604.

  • © 1987, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barrick, W.E.,
    2. J.A. Flore, and
    3. H. Davidson.
    1979. Deicing salt spray injury in selected Pinus spp. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104: 617–622.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Buschbom, U.
    1968. Salt resistance of aerial shoots of woody plants. 1. Effects of chlorides on shoot surfaces. Flora 157: 527–561.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Davidson, H.
    1970. Pine mortality along Michigan highways. HortScience 5: 12–13.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Demeritt, M.E., Jr.
    1973. Prospects for selecting and breeding trees resistant to deicing salts. Northeast. For. Tree. Improv. Conf. Proc. 20: 130–140.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dirr, M.A.
    1976. Selection of trees for tolerance to salt injury. J Arboric. 2: 209–216.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hall, R.,
    2. G. Hofstra, and
    3. G.P. Lumis.
    1972. Effects of deicing salt on eastern white pine: Foliar injury, growth suppression, and seasonal changes in foliar concentrations of sodium and chloride. Can. J. For. Res. 2:244–249.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Hofstra, G., and
    2. R. Hall.
    1971. Injury on roadside trees: leaf injury on pine and white cedar in relation to foliar levels of sodium and chloride. Can J. Bot. 49:613–622.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Holloway, P.J.
    1969. Chemistry of leaf waxes in relation to wetting. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 20: 124–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. LaCroix, R.L.,
    2. D.R. Keeney, and
    3. L.M. Walsh.
    1970. Potentiometric titration of chloride in plant tissue extracts using the chloride ion electrode. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 1: 1–6.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Logan, E.T.
    1975. Factors affecting salt tolerance of Pinus strobu. and Pinus thunbergi.. M.S. Thesis. Rutgers Univ. 106pp.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lumis, G.P.,
    2. G. Hofstra, and
    3. R. Hall
    . 1973. Sensitivity of roadside trees and shrubs to aerial dift of deicing salt. HortScience 8: 475–477.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Moss, A.E.
    1940. Effect on trees of wind-driven salt water. J. For. 38: 421–425.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Norris, R.F., and
    2. M.J. Bukovac.
    1970. Structure of the pear leaf cuticle with special reference to cuticular penetrations. Amer. J. Bot. 55: 975–983.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Pyykko, M.
    1977. Effects of salt spray on growth and development of Pinus sylvestris L. Ann. Bot. Fennici 14: 49–61.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Simini, M., and
    2. I.A. Leone.
    1982. Effect of environmental factors on chloride uptake on trees exposed to salt spray. Phytopathology 72: 1163–1166.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sucoff, E.
    1975. Effect of deicing salts on woody vegetation along Minnesota roads. Univ. of Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 303, St. Paul, MN. 49 pp.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sucoff, E.,
    2. R. Feller, and
    3. D. Kanten.
    1975. Deicing salt (sodium chloride) damage to Pinus resinosa Ait. Can. J. For Res. 5: 546–556.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.
    1980. Response of selected tree species to sodium chloride. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 878–883.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Townsend, A.M.
    1983. Short-term response of seven pine species to sodium chloride spray. J. Environ. Hort. 1: 7–9.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Townsnd, A.M.
    1984. Effect of sodium chloride on tree seedlings in two potting media. Environ. Pollut. 34:333–344.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 13, Issue 9
September 1987
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Relative Susceptibility of Thirteen Pine Species to Sodium Chloride Spray
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Relative Susceptibility of Thirteen Pine Species to Sodium Chloride Spray
A.M. Townsend, W.F. Kwolek
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1987, 13 (9) 225-228; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1987.13.9.225

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Relative Susceptibility of Thirteen Pine Species to Sodium Chloride Spray
A.M. Townsend, W.F. Kwolek
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Sep 1987, 13 (9) 225-228; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1987.13.9.225
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire