Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Replacing A Problem Prone Street Tree Saves Money; A Case Study Of The Tuliptree In Berkeley, California

Steven H. Dreistadt and Donald L. Dahlsten
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) June 1986, 12 (6) 146-149; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1986.031
Steven H. Dreistadt
Graduate Research Assistant and Professor, Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94 720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Donald L. Dahlsten
Graduate Research Assistant and Professor, Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94 720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Beatty, R. A.
    1977. Trees for Lafayette. The master tree plan, Lafayette, California. Northern California Chapter, American Society of Landscape Architects Publication Group. Oakland. 64 pp.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Neely, D.
    1975. A guide to the professional evaluation of landscape trees, specimen shrubs, and evergreens. International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana, Illinois.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dahlsten, D. L.,
    2. A. E. Hajek,
    3. D. J. Clair,
    4. S. H. Dreistadt,
    5. D. L. Rowney, and
    6. V. R. Lewis.
    1985. Pest management in the urban forest. California Agriculture. Vol. 39:21–23.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Harris, R. W.
    1983. Arboriculture. Care of Trees, Shrubs, and Vines in the Landscape. Prentiss-Hall, Inc. New Jersey. 688 pp.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Frankie, G. W., and
    2. C. S. Koehler
    1. Kielbaso, J. J., and
    2. M. K. Kennedy
    . 1983. Urban forestry and entomology: a current appraisal. In Frankie, G. W., and C. S. Koehler (eds.) Urban Entomology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Praeger Publishing, pp. 423–440.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mahoney, M. J.,
    2. J. M. Skelly,
    3. B. I. Chevone, and
    4. L. D. Moore
    . 1984. Response of yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) seedling shoot growth to low concentrations of O3, SO2, and NO2. Can. J. For. Res. 14:150–153.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Maino, E., and
    2. F. Howard
    . 1975. Ornamental Trees. An illustrated guide to their selection and care. University of California Press. Berkeley, p. 63.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Pirone, P. P.
    1978. Tree Maintenance. Oxford University Press. New York. Fifth Edition. 587 pp.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schomaker, C. E., and
    2. V. J. Rudolph
    . 1964. Nutritional relationships affecting height growth of planted yellowpoplar in southwestern Michigan. For. Sci. 10:66–75.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 12, Issue 6
June 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Replacing A Problem Prone Street Tree Saves Money; A Case Study Of The Tuliptree In Berkeley, California
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Replacing A Problem Prone Street Tree Saves Money; A Case Study Of The Tuliptree In Berkeley, California
Steven H. Dreistadt, Donald L. Dahlsten
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jun 1986, 12 (6) 146-149; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.031

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Replacing A Problem Prone Street Tree Saves Money; A Case Study Of The Tuliptree In Berkeley, California
Steven H. Dreistadt, Donald L. Dahlsten
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jun 1986, 12 (6) 146-149; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.031
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire