Article Figures & Data
Tables
Where information obtained Percent Books 14 Commercial Service 3 Cooperative Extension Service 8 Friends 11 Garden Center 43 Library 8 - Table 2.
Comparison to expected values of homeowner respondents' frequency of pruning their trees and shrubs to their interest in a commercial IPM program.
Interest in an IPM program Frequency of pruning yes no X2 Annually 53 18 41.02* (expected) (41.2) (29.8) Occasionally 61 38 (expected) (57.4) (41.6) Rarely or never 2 28 (expected) (17.4) (12.6) ↵* Significant at 0.01 level
- Table 3.
Comparison to expected values of homeowner respondents' frequency of fertilizing their trees and shrubs to their interest in a commercial IPM program.
Interest in an IPM program Frequency of pruning yes no X2 Annually or biennially 42 11 42.23* (expected) (30.7) (22.3) Occasionally 67 37 (expected) (60.3) (43.7) Rarely or never 7 36 (expected) (24.9) (18.1) ↵* Significant at 0.01 level
Tactic Percent Employ only alternatives 33 Only reduced aestdetic damage 40 Apply pesticides only as a remedy 62 Provide a tree healtd care program 67 - Table 6.
Percent of 116 homeowner respondents who selected a reason as priority as to why they would hire a commercial IPM program.
Major reason Percent Healthier trees and shrubs 42 Lack of personal information on plant care 30 Fewer insects in yard 18 Lack of time 14
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.