Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Pot Test Of Fabrics For Constraining Tree Roots

J. Alan Wagar
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1986, 12 (4) 96; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1986.021
J. Alan Wagar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Tough fabrics may provide an economical way to protect sidewalks from tree roots. In a limited test, effects of Eucalyptus globulus roots were examined for 20 fabrics. These included window screen, panty hose, and felt, knit, and woven “geotextiles” of polypropylene, nylon, and polyester. Twenty-nine seedlings (2 each for 9 materials, 1 each for 11 others) were planted in peat and pearlite in 1 -gallon pots, with each seedling placed above a slanting fabric sample. Seedlings were watered regularly but not fertilized and were placed in a small patio surrounded by a building that blocked direct sunlight most of the year.

Roots were inspected after 22 to 23 months. By then seedlings were 1.2 to 7.5 feet tall (ave. = 5 feet) with caliper of 0.3 to 1.2 inches (ave. = 0.62 inch). Because only eucalyptus was tested and had few roots larger than 0.25 inch in diameter, conclusions and extrapolations to other species, larger trees, and longer periods must be tentative. But sufficient patterns emerged to provide guidelines for further trials.

Fabrics did inhibit the growth of roots. Unyielding material with mesh sizes greater than approximately 0.03 inch constricted roots. When strands between openings were thin, roots tended to overgrow and embed them but were nevertheless stunted (fig. 1). Larger strands or greater amounts of fiber between openings were not overgrown (fig. 2).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Roots tended to overgrow and embed thin strands of fabric but were nevertheless stunted.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Roots did not overgrow strands that were thick relative to openings.

Tough materials with small openings deflected roots. Roots appeared unaffected by elastic material from nylon panty hose, and roots penetrating polypropylene felts stretched the small openings before being constricted by the combined strength of displaced fibers.

Additional information is expected from a full-scale study with 36 London planes (Platanus acerifolia) and 36 poplars Populus candicans) being field grown with barriers of polypropylene felt and woven polypropylene.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P O Box 245 Berkeley, California 94701.

  • © 1986, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 12, Issue 4
April 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pot Test Of Fabrics For Constraining Tree Roots
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Pot Test Of Fabrics For Constraining Tree Roots
J. Alan Wagar
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1986, 12 (4) 96; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pot Test Of Fabrics For Constraining Tree Roots
J. Alan Wagar
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1986, 12 (4) 96; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Perceived Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Private-Sector Urban and Community Forestry in the Southern United States
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire