Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Warning: Topping Is Hazardous To Your Tree’s Health!

C. A. Kaiser, M. L. Witt, J. R. Hartman, R. E. McNiel and W. C. Dunwell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) February 1986, 12 (2) 50-52; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1986.011
C. A. Kaiser
Adapted from University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Publication, ID-55. Departments of Plant Pathology and of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Lexington, Kentucky 40546.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
M. L. Witt
Adapted from University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Publication, ID-55. Departments of Plant Pathology and of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Lexington, Kentucky 40546.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
J. R. Hartman
Adapted from University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Publication, ID-55. Departments of Plant Pathology and of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Lexington, Kentucky 40546.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R. E. McNiel
Adapted from University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Publication, ID-55. Departments of Plant Pathology and of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Lexington, Kentucky 40546.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
W. C. Dunwell
Adapted from University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Publication, ID-55. Departments of Plant Pathology and of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Lexington, Kentucky 40546.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

What is Topping?

Listen

Topping is the drastic removal or cutting back of large branches in mature trees. The tree is pruned much as a hedge is sheared and the main branches are cut to stubs (Figure 1). Topping is also referred to as heading, stubbing or dehorning.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A tree that has been topped. DO NOT do this to your trees!

Why Are Trees Topped?

Listen

Many homeowners have their trees topped, often by so-called professionals when their trees have reached heights which they consider unsafe. They fear a strong wind might blow these large trees over. This fear is largely unjustified. The extensive root system of a healthy tree, if left relatively undisturbed, provides adequate support for the tree. An old healthy tree with a good root system is actually less likely to blow over than a smaller tree with its smaller, less developed root system.

Some homeowners believe that the stimulation of new growth associated with topping is actually beneficial to the tree. Although the tree appears rejuvenated with new foliage and branches, this only serves to mask the real injury topping does to the tree.

Trees may also be topped to remove potentially hazardous dead and diseased branches which may break off during ice or wind storms. Unfortunately, topping removes both healthy as well as unhealthy limbs. The hazardous limbs are best removed by selective pruning instead of topping.

Large, mature trees are often topped to prevent interference with overhead utility wires (Figure 2). They are also topped when they block views, interfere with buildings or other trees, or shade solar collectors or other areas (e.g., lawns and gardens) where sunlight is wanted. In some of these situations, removing large limbs may be necessary; however, correct pruning alternatives such as proper early training, selective thinning out of branches and limbs, or whole tree removal should be considered and adopted where feasible.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Trees are often topped to eliminate interference with utility lines.

Why Is Topping Injurious to Trees?

Listen

Topping can injure a tree in the following ways:

• Removing much of the tree canopy upsets the crown-to-root ratio and seriously affects the tree’s food supply. A 20-year-old tree has developed 20 years worth of leaf surface area. This leaf surface is needed to manufacture sufficient food to feed and support 20 years worth of branches, trunks, and roots. Topping not only cuts off a major portion of the tree’s food-making potential, it also severely depletes the tree’s stored reserves. It is an open invitation for the tree’s slow starvation.

  • Removing the tree’s normal canopy suddenly exposes the bark to the sun’s direct rays, often scalding the newly exposed outer bark.

  • Topping removes all the existing buds which would ordinarily produce normal sturdy branches.

  • Large branch stubs left from topping seldom close or callus. Nutrients are no longer transported to the large stubs and that part of the tree becomes unable to seal off the injury. This leaves the stubs vulnerable to insect invasion and fungal decay (Figure 3). Once decay has begun in a branch stub, it may spread into the main trunk, ultimately killing the tree. Fruiting bodies of decay fungi (Figure 4) are often visible on the bark of decaying trees.

  • Topping stimulates the regrowth of dense, upright branches just below the pruning cut (Figure 5). These new shoots, referred to as “suckers” or “water sprouts,” are not as structurally sound as are the naturally occurring branches. These water sprouts often consist of succulent growth which is more susceptible to diseases such as fire blight (rosaceous trees) and herbivorous insects such as aphids and caterpillars.

  • Since water sprout regrowth is generally rapid and vigorous, a topped tree often will grow back to its original height faster and denser than a tree that has been properly pruned or thinned. This makes topping, at best, only a temporary solution to oversized trees.

  • Some tree species (e.g., sugar maple, oak and beech) do not readily produce water sprouts. Without the resulting foliage, a bare trunk results and the tree quickly dies.

  • Deteriorating branch stubs, along with weak water sprout growth, make topped trees highly vulnerable to wind and ice damage.

  • From an aesthetics aspect, topping disfigures the tree. Unsightly branch stubs, conspicuous pruning cuts and a broom-like branch growth replace its natural beauty and form. The practice of topping probably started in Europe where people did not really want shade trees, but instead wanted trees that would still allow the sun to shine in their gardens. Species used there such as London plane and linden can survive many such toppings. Topped trees are unnatural substitutes for shade trees meant to offer several lifetimes of beauty and enjoyment.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Internal decay, often not visible from the outside, weakens tree limbs.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A conk (fungal fruiting structure) is a visible sign of decay In trees.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Dense, upright branches develop as a result of topping.

What Are the Alternatives?

Listen

There are situations where reducing the tree crown is desirable and necessary. A less injurious alternative for accomplishing this is “thinning-out” which involves removing selected branches by pruning them back to the lower lateral branches (Figure 6). This reduces the tree’s height and spread while retaining its natural shape. Only selected portions of the tree’s canopy are removed, reducing the likelihood of sun scald damage. Pruning cuts are made close to the trunk, leaving only the collar of the removed branch instead of stubs. These pruning cuts are less conspicuous than those left from topping and they “heal” more rapidly and completely. Thinning-out requires greater skill and time than topping but, in most situations, it is well worth it.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

The tree crown can be reduced by “thinning-out” selected branches.

In many circumstances, it may be better to remove a tree you consider too large and replace it with a smaller one. Before replanting, consider the potential height and spread of the tree at full maturity. Avoid planting where the tree will eventually interfere with utility lines or other obstacles. Careful planning ahead can often eliminate the necessity of drastic pruning in the future.

Careful and judicious pruning while the tree is young can eliminate the need for major pruning later on. This can effectively control tree growth and preserve the natural form of the tree without causing serious damage to tree health. Pruning is a continuing task which requires foresight, but it is also a good investment in time and money.

Conclusion

Listen

Topping damages hundreds of large, beautiful trees each year. Many people are unaware of the detrimental effects of topping. Others regard trees as blocks of wood rather than living organisms that can be easily injured. This type of misinformation about tree care needs to be corrected. Trees are subjected to a number of stresses during their lifetime. Many of these, such as lightning, flooding, and drought, are stresses that we have little or no control over. Topping is also a form of stress, but it is a stress that can be avoided.

Unfortunately, even some “knowledgeable” tree service companies indiscriminantly top trees. Avoid patronizing those companies which advocate topping.

  • © 1986, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 12, Issue 2
February 1986
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Warning: Topping Is Hazardous To Your Tree’s Health!
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Warning: Topping Is Hazardous To Your Tree’s Health!
C. A. Kaiser, M. L. Witt, J. R. Hartman, R. E. McNiel, W. C. Dunwell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Feb 1986, 12 (2) 50-52; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Warning: Topping Is Hazardous To Your Tree’s Health!
C. A. Kaiser, M. L. Witt, J. R. Hartman, R. E. McNiel, W. C. Dunwell
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Feb 1986, 12 (2) 50-52; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1986.011
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • What is Topping?
    • Why Are Trees Topped?
    • Why Is Topping Injurious to Trees?
    • What Are the Alternatives?
    • Conclusion
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Assessing Biodiversity Associated with Four Monumental Trees in Madrid Region (Spain)
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire