Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Cypress Canker Control With Fungicides

Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 1984, 10 (7) 212-214; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1984.044
Arthur H. McCain
Extension Plant Pathologist, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Germination of S. cardinals on fungicide amended PDA.

    Percent germination
    g/liter*
    Fungicide1000500100100
    Tribasic copper sulfate96100100100–
    Benomyl–80100100–
    Chlorothalonil0000–
    Control (unamended)––––100
    • ↵* Average from 2 plates after 24 hours.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Growth of S. cardinale on fungicide amended PDA.

    Radial Growth (mm) *
    g/liter
    Fungicide10001001010
    Control (unamended)––––51
    Tribasic copper sulfate**15434753–
    Chlorothalonil8121318–
    Benomyl00000
    • ↵* Average of 8 plates after 10 days incubation

    • ↵** Based on 53% Cu; 1000 g/liter Cu, etc.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Control of cypress canker with fungicides.

    Average number of Infections per plant*
    TreatmentC. leylandiiC. macrocarpa
    benomyl0.750.4
    chlorothalonil0.252.0
    tribasic9.54.2
    control6.34.6
           LSD 0.053.01.3
           LSD 0.014.21.8
    • ↵* Average of 5 plants; 10 wounds/plant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 10, Issue 7
July 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cypress Canker Control With Fungicides
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Cypress Canker Control With Fungicides
Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1984, 10 (7) 212-214; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.044

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cypress Canker Control With Fungicides
Arthur H. McCain
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 1984, 10 (7) 212-214; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.044
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
  • Energy Potential of Urban Tree Pruning Waste
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire