Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Assessment Of Pesticide Usages By Commercial and Municipal Arborists

Dan Neely, E.B. Himelick and Steven Cline
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1984, 10 (5) 143-147; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1984.027
Dan Neely
Section of Botany and Pathology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody, Champaign, Illinois 61820
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
E.B. Himelick
Section of Botany and Pathology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody, Champaign, Illinois 61820
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Cline
Section of Botany and Pathology, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody, Champaign, Illinois 61820
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Comparative size of 68 commercial firms in Illinois based on number of employees.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Comparative gross sales in thousands of dollars of 64 firms in Illinois engaged in commercial arboriculture.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Comparative percentage of gross sales derived from pest control services by 63 Illinois commercial arborists.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The number of commercial arborists (out of 68 who responded) that reported use of a particular pesticide in 1982.

    FungicideUse frequencyInsecticideUse frequency
    Arbotect16Acephate31
    Benomyl43BT26
    Bordeaux13Carbaryl53
    Captaiol2Chlordane9
    Captan16Chlorpyrifos23
    Chlorothalonil7Diazinon38
    Copper3Dicofol32
    Cycloheximide6Dimethoate42
    Dinocap2Disulfoton1
    Dodine2Ethion1
    Ferbam9Lindane9
    Folpet3Malathion57
    Mancozeb10Methoxychlor18
    Maneb15Oil (dormant)46
    Streptomycin9Oxydemeton methyl2
    Sulfur2Trichlorofon1
    Thiram10
    Zineb24
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    The reported frequency of spray use by commercial arborists to trees of a fungicide, insecticide, or a combination of both in 1982.

    HostTotal No. that sprayedInsecticideFungicideCombination
    Arbor-vitae393009
    Ash4735111
    Birch504514
    Boxwood181503
    Cherry3520114
    Crabapple498437
    Currant, alpine221147
    Dogwood262114
    Elm4629215
    Euonymus454005
    Fir, spruce, yew4736011
    Hawthorn424929
    Honeylocust464105
    Horsechestnut2916310
    Juniper4825122
    Maple4937111
    Mountain ash3418214
    Oak4529016
    Pine4733113
    Rhododendron241617
    Sycamore3981021
    Tulip tree332607
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    The reported use of sprays by commercial arborists in 1982 to control insects or diseases, and the ranking of relative importance within each.

    Use frequency (no. arborists)Relative importancea
    ProblemFirstSecondThird
    Diseases
      Anthracnose11659
      Blights14533
      Canker or dieback7213
      Galls14130
      Leaf spots19254
      Powdery mildew14224
      Rust134115
      Scab111456
      DED12432
    Insects
      Aphids285107
      Bagworms221033
      Borers34764
      Caterpillars35544
      Elm bark beetles24123
      Gallmakers20010
      Leaf beetles26012
      Leafminers32110
      Leafhoppers24121
      Mites31448
      Moths (gypsy or tussock)16100
      Plant bugs19000
      Scale insects231086
      Webworms29126
    • ↵a The number of arborists who rated this disease (or insect pest) as first, second, or third in importance in his area.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 10, Issue 5
May 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment Of Pesticide Usages By Commercial and Municipal Arborists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment Of Pesticide Usages By Commercial and Municipal Arborists
Dan Neely, E.B. Himelick, Steven Cline
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1984, 10 (5) 143-147; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment Of Pesticide Usages By Commercial and Municipal Arborists
Dan Neely, E.B. Himelick, Steven Cline
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 1984, 10 (5) 143-147; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.027
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods and Procedures
    • Commercial Arborist Questionnaire
    • Municipal Arborist Questionnaire
    • Arborist Interviews
    • Interpolations and Projections
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire