Abstract
A questionnaire was sent to employers of arborists and urban foresters in the Mountain West Region to determine their perspective as to the level of training and specific skills that should be taught to students of arboriculture and urban forestry. Skills employers frequently found lacking were also assessed. Results of the survey indicte that arborists and urban foresters should receive a minimum of two years and four years of academic training, respectively. Both groups should receive over six months of field experience. Skills deemed most important for arborists are basic tree-care skills, although private and public sector employers differ as to the relative importance of some skills. Respondents report that urban foresters frequently lack public relations and management related skills. These and other findings may especially benefit individuals involved with the development and evaluation of educational training programs in arboriculture and urban forestry.
A primary goal of every academic program in arboriculture/urban forestry is to educate and equip students with the skills needed to obtain employment and perform their assigned tasks in a competent and professional manner. Employers of arborists and urban foresters are an important source of information for educators concerned with curriculum development in arboriculture. Their ideas can provide critical input to the evaluation of the adequacy of existing programs and formulation of new programs. The purpose of this study was to learn employer perspectives on education in arboriculture for use in assessing the need and developing a curriculum for arboriculture/urban forestry.
Research Design and Conduct
A questionnaire was developed to collect information to assess the need for an academic program in an eight state region of the Mountain West. Specific objectives were to determine (1) the present status of community forestry, (2) if there is a perceived need for individuals academically trained in arboriculture/urban forestry, (3) the projected number of employment opportunities for graduates in the next five years, and (4) the level of academic training and types of skills regional employers consider desirable for potential arborists and urban foresters. This report addresses results pertaining to the last objective.
Sample
The target population consisted of all individuals of the study area responsible for hiring arborists and urban foresters. The public sector sample consisted of 171 municipalities. This included all cities with a population greater than 25,000 and smaller cities employing city planners or planning directors as listed in each state’s Municipal Directory. The assumption in both cases was that cities included in the sample employ tree-care personnel.
The private sector portion of the sample consisted of 98 tree-care firms. Firms were selected from the Yellow Page section of telephone books for each city in the study area with a population greater than 25,000. The sample included all eligible tree-care firms from every state except Colorado. Twenty-five of 81 total tree-care firms were drawn at random from Colorado. This resulted in a 31 % sample of all firms in Colorado cities with a population larger than 25,000.
Respondents
Respondents received a two-page questionnaire, letter of transmittal, and return envelope. Two follow-up letters were also sent to non-respondents. To clarify the distinction between arborists and urban foresters, the following definition appeared at the top of each questionnaire: Arborists are defined as individuals responsible for hands-on tree care and maintenance. Urban foresters are more directly responsible for the planning and management of the community or urban forest (i. e. a city forester).
Of the 269 questionnaires mailed out, 175 or 65% were returned. Eighteen questionnaires were returned undeliverable. The response rate of those receiving questionnaires was 70%. The public sector response rate was 82.5% and the private sector response rate was 42.5%. Figure 1 shows the number of public and private sector respondents by city size.
Results and Discussion
Following are survey results from questions concerning employer’s perspectives on (1) minimum level of training, (2) necessary skills for graduates, and (3) skills employees most frequently lack. Although these results apply directly to the Mountain West Region, arborists, urban foresters, and educators throughout the country may find the conclusions applicable to educational programs in their locale.
Minimum level of training
Examination of Andresen’s (1980) inventory of North American arboriculture and urban forestry programs suggests that there is a wide range of curriculum options available at present. He reports that there are currently twelve undergraduate and two graduate curricula in arboriculture. Undergraduate programs are primarily 4-year options within ornamental horticulture departments.
Two-year technical programs are also available. Coufal (1979) conducted a survey of 69 two-year forest technician schools and found a total enrollment of 3,600 students. He noted that technicians were having greater success in finding employment than baccalaureate graduates (4-year degree). Andresen surveyed 54 selected schools offering forest technology and found that 10 arboriculture and related programs or options were underway. Many others offer courses in arboriculture/vegetation management.
Andresen’s survey results indicate that there are currently eighteen undergraduate and nine graduate curricula in North American urban forestry. Undergraduate programs are usually associated with forestry departments and are 4-year programs.
Table 1 shows combined public and private sector response to the question, “What minimum level of academic training do you think a program graduate should have to qualify for current and anticipated job openings in arboriculture and urban forestry?”
Half of the respondents state that a two-year technical degree is the minimum necessary for students preparing to be arborists. Approximately half of the respondents report that students preparing for jobs as urban foresters need a minimum of four years academic training.
Field experience is widely recognized as an essential component of the arboriculture/urban forestry educational experience. Duration of field experience varies with programs and there is little documentation on what employers consider to be a desirable amount of field experience. Table 2 shows the respondents’ attitudes to the question, “What minimum level of school supervised field experience do you think a program graduate should have to qualify for current and anticipated job openings in arboriculture and urban forestry?”
Seventy-six percent of the respondents believe that students in arboriculture should receive over six months of field experience, and 33% indicate that more than nine months is necessary. Employers report that students preparing for jobs as urban foresters should spend only slightly less time gaining field experience than should future arborists.
Necessary skills
Academic programs and specific courses in arboriculture and urban forestry should teach students the skills they need to obtain employment and function in a professional manner. To determine what skills employers deem most important for graduates to acquire, the following question was asked, “Which of the following skills do you feel a graduate of an arboriculture and urban forestry program should have in order to be adequately prepared to pursue a career?” Respondents checked those skills applicable for an arborist and urban forester from a list of 38 skills. Space was provided so that other skills not included on the list could be written in.
Table 3 provides a rank ordering of skills thought necessary for graduating arborists about to enter the job market. Because employers from both the private and public sector hire arborists, skills are ranked separately for each sector. The percentage of respondents selecting each skill is shown in parentheses.
Differences exist between private and public sector responses regarding the importance of certain skills for arborists. A larger percentage of private sector employers regard tree surgery, accounting, cabling and bracing, public speaking, and business law skills as necessary than do public sector respondents. However, a larger percentage of public sector employers regard knowledge of irrigation systems, landscape design, dendrology, tree inventory techniques, and plant ecology as necessary for arborists than do private sector employers. This may be due to the fact that arborists in many smaller western communities are expected to be jacks-of-all-trades, and do things other than tree care work.
Table 4 shows a rank ordering of skills public sector respondents indicate graduating urban foresters should possess. Only public sector responses are shown because relatively few urban foresters are hired by the private sector.
The planning and management role of urban foresters is reflected by the large percentage of respondents who feel that necessary skills include general botany, shade and street tree selection, public relations, writing skills, budgeting, and landscape management. The need for competency in tree surgery, cabling and bracing, and wound repair is regarded as less important for urban foresters than for arborists.
Skills lacking
Employers often find that their employees lack necessary training in certain areas. Once these areas are identified, courses, curricula, and training programs can be evaluated and, if necessary, changed to place greater emphasis upon teaching these skills. Responses to the following question provide data regarding this issue. “Which of the above skills that you have checked [as necessary] do you find frequently lacking in individuals that secure positions in arboriculture and urban forestry?”
Table 5 shows a rank ordering of skills reported as frequently lacking for arborists and urban foresters. Private sector responses were used to rank order arborists’ skills lacking. Only public sector responses were used to rank order urban foresters’ skills often lacking because most urban foresters are hired by public sector employers.
The data indicate that arborists are reported to often lack sufficient training in basic tree-care skills and equipment operation. In addition, greater training emphasis is needed in the areas of public relations and public speaking skills. Employers of urban foresters report that public relations and management related skills are most frequently lacking. This may reflect the fact that most urban foresters are expected to promote as well as manage urban forestry programs. Com-munication skills are necessary if this is to be done effectively.
Private sector | Public sector |
---|---|
Additional skills listed | |
CPR & first aid Rescue procedures Time management skills Personnel management Sales ability Tree law/statues & ordinances Saw maintenance & operation | Personnel management Climbing techniques, ropes & knots Contract administration CPR & first aid Principles of electrical conductivity Water law Landscape construction Chemistry |
Conclusions
A majority of respondents report that students preparing to be arborists should receive a minimum of two years academic training and over six months of field experience. Students preparing to be urban foresters should receive at least four years of academic training and approximately the same amount of field experience as students of arboriculture.
Although employers of arborists agree that graduates of an arboriculture program should be taught basic tree care skills such as pruning and tree removal techniques, fertilization techniques, insect and disease control, etc., private and public sector employers differ in opinion as to the relative importance of some skills. Public sector employers expect arborists to perform a wider range of tasks than do commercial tree-care firms. Arborists seeking employment in Mountain West municipalities might be expected to demonstrate competencies in irrigation systems, landscape design, and tree inventory techniques.
Employers of urban foresters report that students should develop competencies in areas such as shade and street tree selection, plant materials, public relations, and budgeting, as well as in traditional tree-care procedures. They also indicate that urban foresters most frequently lack public relations and management related skills, which are essential to the promotion and perpetuation of urban forestry programs. Greater emphasis needs to be placed upon development of these skills for arborists and urban foresters alike.
Acknowledgements
Support for this project was provided by the Utah Division of State Lands and Forestry. I would also like to acknowledge technical assistance from Jerry Sempek and the Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning at Utah State University. Copies of the complete study are available upon request at the following address: Urban Forestry Coordinator, Division of State Lands and Forestry, Room 3100, State Office Building, Salt Lake City, UT 84114
- © 1984, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.