Environmental Effects of Insect Defoliation

Literature Cited

1. 1.↵
   1. J.F. Mitton and
   2. K.B. Sturgeon (eds.)

   1. Borden, J.H.

   1982. Aggregate pheromones. In: J.F. Mitton and K.B. Sturgeon (eds.) Bark beetles in North American Conifers, 74-139. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.
2. 2.↵
   1. Campbell, R.W.

   1979. Gypsy moth: forest influence. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Inform. Bull. No. 423. 44 p.
3. 3.↵
   1. Clark, L.R.,
   2. P.W. Geier,
   3. R.D. Hughes and
   4. R.F. Morris

   . 1967. The ecology of insect populations in theory and practice. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London, 232 p.
4. 4.↵
   1. Doane, C.C. and
   2. M.L. McManus

   . 1981. The gypsy moth: research towards integrated pest management. U.S. Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull. 1584. 757 p.
5. 5.↵
   1. Giese, R.L.,
   2. J.E. Kapler and
   3. D.M. Benjamin

   . 1964. Defoliation and the genesis of maple blight. In: Studies of maple blight. Part IV, p. 81-114. Univ. Wise. Res. Bull. 250.

   OpenUrl
6. 6.↵
   1. Houston, D.R.

   1979. Classifying forest susceptibility to gypsy moth defoliation. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handb. 542. 23 p.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Knight, F.B. and
   2. H.J. Heikkenen

   . 1980. Principles of forest entomology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 461 p.
8. 8.↵
   1. C.C. Doane and
   2. M.L. McManus (eds.)

   1. Leonard, D.E.

   1981. Bioecology of the gypsy moth. In: C.C. Doane and M.L. McManus (eds.). The gypsy moth: research towards integrated pest management, 9-29. U.S. Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull. 1584.
9. 9.↵
   1. McManus, M.L.,
   2. D.R. Houston and
   3. W.E. Wallner

   . 1979. The homeowner and the gypsy moth: guidelines for control. U.S. Dept. Agric., Home and Garden Bull. 227. 34 P.
10. 10.↵
    1. Montgomery, M.E. and
    2. P.M. Wargo

    . 1983. Ethanol and other host-derived volatiles as attractants to beetles that bore into hardwoods. J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 74-139. Univ. Texas Press, Austin.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Parker, J. and
    2. D.R. Houston

    . 1971. Effects of defoliation on root and root collar extractives of sugar maple trees. Forest Sci. 17: 91-95.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Richards, N.A.

    1983. Diversity and stability in a street tree population. Urban Ecology 7(1982/1983): 159-171.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Schneeberger, N.F.

    1983. 1982 gypsy moth defoliation. Gypsy Moth News, No 6. U.S. Dept. Agric., For. Service, FPM, Morgantown, VA. 13 p.
14. 14.↵
    1. Skilling, D.D.

    1964. Ecological factors associated with maple blight. In: Studies of maple blight. Part V p. 115-129. Univ. Wise. Res. Bull. 250.
15. 15.↵
    1. Staley, J.M.

    1965. Decline and mortality of red and scarlet oak. For. Sci. 11: 2-17.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Stark, R.W.

    1977. Integrated pest management in forest practice. J. Forestry. 75: 251-254.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Wargo, P.M.

    1978. Defoliation by the gypsy moth: how it hurts your tree. U.S. Dept. Agric., Home Garden Bull. 223. 15 p.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Wargo, P.M.

    1978. Insects have defoliated my tree — now what’s going to happen? J. Arboric. 4(8): 169-175.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. C.C. Doane and
    2. M.L. McManus

    1. Wargo, P.M.

    1981. Defoliation and tree growth. In: C.C. Doane and M.L. McManus (eds.). The gypsy moth: research towards integrated pest management, 225-248. U.S. Dept. Agric., Tech. Bull. 1584.
20. 20.↵
    1. Wilson, R.W., Jr.. and
    2. G.A. Fontaine

    . 1978. Gypsy moth egg-mass sampling with fixed- and variable-radius plots. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Handb. 523. 46 p.

    OpenUrl