Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

The Bird Population of A Transmission Right-of-Way Maintained by Herbicides

W.C. Bramble, W.R. Byrnes and M.D. Schuler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 1984, 10 (1) 13-20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1984.004
W.C. Bramble
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
W.R. Byrnes
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
M.D. Schuler
Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A ROW sample unit, maintained with herbicides, with a high population of 11.2 birds per hectare counted per census day. A shrub-herb-fern-grass plant cover along with resurgent trees was present.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Typical oak-hickory forest adjacent to the ROW. The forest was two-layered with a 1 M-tall herb layer and a 12 to 18 M tree layer.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Spot maps for 6 consecutive census days on a ROW sample unit (d-3), 1.1 ha in area, with a population of 11.2 birds counted per ha per census day. Key to species: A = towhee, B = yellowthroat, C = catbird, D = field sparrow, E = goldfinch, F = downy woodpecker, G = black and white warbler, H = cedar waxwing, I = goldenwinged warbler, J = least flycatcher, K = myrtle warbler, L = rosebreasted grosbeak, M = white-breasted nuthatch, N = cowbird. Each dot represents an individual bird.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Composite spot maps of the distribution of the 5 most common bird species on a ROW sample unit, 1.1 ha in area, with a population of 11.2 birds counted per ha per census day. Lines connect birds counted on the same day; each dot represents an individual bird.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    An immature yellowthroat feeding on the ROW. This was the most common species on the ROW.

Tables

  • Figures
  • 1951-52The ROW was clearcut during capital construction through an upland oak-hickory forest.
    1953Five herbicide treatments and handcutting were each replicated 4 times on 20 ROW units along a 5 km segment. Chemicals used were 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, and ammonium sulphamate.
    1954A follow-up selective basal spray of 2,4-D + 2,4,5-T was applied to one-half of each herbicide treatment area.
    1958Handcut units were clearcut.
    1966A selective basal spray, stump spray and stemfoliage spray of 2,4-D + 2,4,5-T was applied to the entire 5 km segment as needed.
    1967Handcut units were clearcut.
    1976Handcut units were clearcut.
    1982A bird census was carried out in July just prior to application of new ROW maintenance treatments.
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Number of birds counted per hectare per day on ROW and forest sample units for the 6-day census in July, 1982.

    Census date JulyNumber of birds per hectare
    ROW-herbicideROW-handcutAdjoining forest
    125.74.73.1
    138.45.75.0
    146.85.63.1
    156.37.12.9
    166.54.93.4
    174.84.82.8
    Mean6.45.53.4
    Std. Dev.1.20.90.8
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Number of individual birds recorded In 6 census days (July 12-17, 1982) on the ROW and in the adjoining forest. Species names are from Person (1980) and the most common species are marked with an asterisk.

    SpeciesNo. birds per hectare
    ROW-herbicideROW-handcutAdjoining forest
    Most common on ROW   
    Common yellowthroat, Geothlypis trichas10.4*  9.3*  1.6*
    Rufous-sides towhee, Pipilo erythrophthalmus  6.1*  1.9*  2.8*
    Field sparrow, Spizella pusilia  4.2*0.70.1
    Indigo bunting, Passerina cyanea  3.5*  3.0*0.1
    Gray catbird, Dumetella carolinensis  3.1*  5.9*0.1
    Common on ROW   
    Black-capped chickadee, Parus atricapillus1.81.51.0
    Chestnut-sided warbler, Dendroica pensylvanica1.5  2.2*0.2
    American goldfinch, Carduelis tristis1.20.4—
    Downy woodpecker, Picoides pubescens0.90.40.8
    American robin, Turdus migratorius0.50.70.2
    White-breasted nuthatch, Sitta carolinensis0.5—0.7
    Occasional on ROW   
    American redstart, Setophaga ruticilia0.4  1.9*0.6
    Brown-headed cowbird, Molothrus ater0.40.7—
    Red-eyed vireo, Vireo olivaceus0.40.7  2.6*
    Scarlet tanager, Piranga olivacea0.40.40.9
    Song sparrow, Melospiza melodia0.4——
    Rose-breasted grosbeak, Pheucticus ludovicianus0.3—0.1
    Black-and-white warbler, Mniotilta varia0.31.1—
    Blue-gray gnatcatcher, Polioptila caerulea0.30.4—
    Cedar waxwing, Bombycilla cedrorum0.3——
    Great crested flycatcher, Myiarchus crinitus0.3—0.2
    Wood thrush, Hylocichla musteline0.3—  1.3*
    Black-billed cuckoo, Coccyzus   
    erythropthalmus0.2——
    Least flycatcher, Empidonax minimus0.2—0.1
    Yellow-rumped warbler, Dendroica coronata0.2—0.1
    Brown creeper, Certhia familiaris0.1——
    Canada warbler, Wilsonia canadensis0.1——
    American crow, Corvus brachyrhynchos0.1——
    Golden-winged warbler, Vermivora chrysoptera0.1—0.1
    Ruffed grouse, Bonasa umbellus0.1—0.1
    Ovenbird, Seiurus aurocapillus—0.4  1.2*
    Eastern pewee, Contopus virens——0.7
    Worm-eating warbler, Helmitheros vermivorus——0.4
    Broad-winged hawk, Buteo platypterus——0.2
    Common (yellow-shafted) flicker, Colaptes auratus——0.1
    Northern cardinal, Cardinalis cardinalis——0.1
    Great horned owl, Bubo virginianus——0.1
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 10, Issue 1
January 1984
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Bird Population of A Transmission Right-of-Way Maintained by Herbicides
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
The Bird Population of A Transmission Right-of-Way Maintained by Herbicides
W.C. Bramble, W.R. Byrnes, M.D. Schuler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1984, 10 (1) 13-20; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Bird Population of A Transmission Right-of-Way Maintained by Herbicides
W.C. Bramble, W.R. Byrnes, M.D. Schuler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 1984, 10 (1) 13-20; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1984.004
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Plant Cover Present
    • Census Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Linking Urban Greening and Community Engagement with Heat-Related Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review of the Literature
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire